Axiom vs C++

[asetof...@gmail.com]

http://www.axiom-developer.org/
Can you show a little function it is better to write in C++ than in Axiom?

[Alf P. Steinbach]

On 31-May-17 10:32 AM, asetof...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.axiom-developer.org/
> Can you show a little function it is better to write in C++ than in Axiom?

I don't know the Axiom language (assuming that it is a language), but
happily the answer doesn't depend on the particulars of the languages.

See the FAQ item “Is C++ better than Java? (or C#, C, Objective-C,
JavaScript, Ruby, Perl, PHP, Haskell, FORTRAN, Pascal, Ada, Smalltalk,
or any other language?)”, e.g. at <url:
https://isocpp.org/wiki/faq/big-picture#lang-comparisons>.

It's often a good idea to check the FAQ before posting. ;-)


Cheers & hth.,

- Alf

[Öö Tiib]

On Wednesday, 31 May 2017 11:32:28 UTC+3, asetof...@gmail.com wrote:
> http://www.axiom-developer.org/
> Can you show a little function it is better to write in C++ than in Axiom?

You seem confused. That Axiom is not programming language.

It is computer algebra system (CAS). Most CAS are open source:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_computer_algebra_systems

If you want to discuss C++ code then discuss the code of ones that
are written in C++. Axiom was written in LIsp.

[asetof...@gmail.com]

It is one programming language
one can write functions and them have results as in every language...

[red floyd]

On 06/02/2017 06:51 AM, asetof...@gmail.com wrote:
> It is one programming language
> one can write functions and them have results as in every language...
>

Why are you asking? To show how much more awesome Axiom is?
If Axiom is Turing-complete, then there is no function written in C++
that can't be written in Axiom, and vice-versa,