Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Re: sequencing redux
16 views
Skip to first unread message
Juha Nieminen
Sep 21, 2018, 12:05:51 AM9/21/18
to
Stefan Ram <r...@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Therefore
>
> ::std::cout << ++i << ++i << '\n';
>
> now is not undefined behavior anymore.
Didn't C++17 disambiguate quite many such things?
> Therefore
>
> ::std::cout << ++i << ++i << '\n';
>
> now is not undefined behavior anymore.
Didn't C++17 disambiguate quite many such things?
Öö Tiib
Sep 21, 2018, 4:47:26 AM9/21/18
to
expect it to be something different and so are confused with what it
does. Better not to write such code even when it is well-defined.
Also the results of order of evaluation poll of Herb Sutter
illustrate it:
https://herbsutter.com/2014/12/01/a-quick-poll-about-order-of-evaluation/
0 new messages