Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
More precision, read again..
10 views
Skip to first unread message
Sky89
May 19, 2018, 12:18:06 PM5/19/18
to
Hello,
More precision, read again..
I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned ,
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this
exception of ERangeError etc.
But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C
because it is not good for safety-critical systems.
You can carefully read the following, it is very important:
https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
More precision, read again..
I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned ,
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this
exception of ERangeError etc.
But C++ and C don't have range checking, so that's not good in C++ and C
because it is not good for safety-critical systems.
You can carefully read the following, it is very important:
https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages