So full of shit

[Mr Flibble]

Rick C. Hodgin is so full of shit. Safely ignore.

--
“You won’t burn in hell. But be nice anyway.” – Ricky Gervais

“I see Atheists are fighting and killing each other again, over who
doesn’t believe in any God the most. Oh, no..wait.. that never happens.” –
Ricky Gervais

"Suppose it's all true, and you walk up to the pearly gates, and are
confronted by God," Bryne asked on his show The Meaning of Life. "What
will Stephen Fry say to him, her, or it?"
"I'd say, bone cancer in children? What's that about?" Fry replied.
"How dare you? How dare you create a world to which there is such misery
that is not our fault. It's not right, it's utterly, utterly evil."
"Why should I respect a capricious, mean-minded, stupid God who creates a
world that is so full of injustice and pain. That's what I would say."

[bitrex]

On 01/02/2019 05:20 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Rick C. Hodgin is so full of shit.  Safely ignore.
>

I used to go to church regularly in the US as a kid until I thought
"Gosh, these people are full of shit."

In my 20s I went to a university atheist meeting and thought "Gosh,
these people are even worse!"

I just take Sundays off, now.

[bitrex]

By picking one of those options you're more or less just picking what
form you want to take your Ayn Rand fanboys in, you see.

[Mr Flibble]

Atheism is neither a religion nor a philosophy. Atheism is simply the lack
of belief in deities.

/Flibble

[bitrex]

On 01/03/2019 08:30 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 04/01/2019 01:24, bitrex wrote:
>> On 01/03/2019 08:17 PM, bitrex wrote:
>>> On 01/02/2019 05:20 PM, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>> Rick C. Hodgin is so full of shit.  Safely ignore.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I used to go to church regularly in the US as a kid until I thought
>>> "Gosh, these people are full of shit."
>>>
>>> In my 20s I went to a university atheist meeting and thought "Gosh,
>>> these people are even worse!"
>>>
>>> I just take Sundays off, now.
>>
>> By picking one of those options you're more or less just picking what
>> form you want to take your Ayn Rand fanboys in, you see.
>
> Atheism is neither a religion nor a philosophy. Atheism is simply the
> lack of belief in deities.
>
> /Flibble
>

Right. It's like God-veganism, where veganism is defined as the lack of
eating animal products and ensuring your friends and family are aware
this is the case

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 8:30:51 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Atheism is neither a religion nor a philosophy. Atheism is simply the lack
> of belief in deities.

Atheism is a belief system, one that states their are no deities.
That position cannot be proven. It is wholly a religion, and one
these "secularists" are trying to force on the world, kicking "religion"
out of all public places not realizing they're following their own
militant religion all the while.

It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing his will
in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect on people.

Someday you will see this, Leigh. Here or there, one day you too
will know the truth.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[David Brown]

No, not at all.

Of course, there are some "evangelistic atheists" - people who actively
try to convince others that religion of any sort is a bad idea, or that
their religious beliefs are worthless.

But the huge majority of atheists simply don't have any religious
beliefs or any belief in the "supernatural" or "divine". (That does
/not/ mean they think science knows everything, or that everything is
explainable.) They don't care about religion - it is not part of their
lives. They also don't care what other people think or belief -
atheists in general are quite happy for others to have whatever
religious beliefs they want, as long as those people don't force it on
others. If /you/ want to go to church, that's fine - just don't expect
/others/ to go to church for your benefit. Atheists are usually
tolerant of everything except intolerance.

The whole thing is more like supporting football teams. Some people -
the religious people - have a favourite football team. Most of these
are only vaguely fans - they might watch an occasional match, or be
happy when their team wins, or have a coffee mug with the team logo.
Others are rabid fans, dressing in their team colours, travelling around
the country to watch them play. And some are violent, actively seeking
out competing fans for fights.

Atheists are the people who don't bother watching football, or do so
only from the viewpoint of seeing well-played sport regardless of who is
playing.

[Mr Flibble]

On 04/01/2019 04:13, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Thursday, January 3, 2019 at 8:30:51 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> Atheism is neither a religion nor a philosophy. Atheism is simply the lack
>> of belief in deities.
>
> Atheism is a belief system, one that states their are no deities.
> That position cannot be proven. It is wholly a religion, and one
> these "secularists" are trying to force on the world, kicking "religion"
> out of all public places not realizing they're following their own
> militant religion all the while.

Wrong. Atheism is no more a religion than "off" or "standby" is a TV
channel. Atheism absolutely does NOT make a claim that there are no
deities as that would be a position of knowledge not belief. Atheism is
simply the LACK OF BELIEF in deities. A lack of belief is NOT a belief.

>
> It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing his will
> in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect on people.

Assertion made without evidence. Satan does not exist (prove otherwise).

>
> Someday you will see this, Leigh. Here or there, one day you too
> will know the truth.

See what? The truth? I am correct and you are incorrect so what you claim
to be "true" I claim to be "bullshit".

Now fuck off.

[Siri Cruise]

Bowman: My god! It's full of dereference operators!

--
:-<> Siri Seal of Disavowal #000-001. Disavowed. Denied. Deleted. @
'I desire mercy, not sacrifice.' /|\
The first law of discordiamism: The more energy This post / \
to make order is nore energy made into entropy. insults Islam. Mohammed

[Unto Sten]

Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing
> his will in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect
> on people.

Rick, religion has made a moron out of you. For years you
have polluted technical, programming-related newsgroups
with spam messages that are full of outdated, delusional
ideas based on the Bible.

The Bible is actually one of the worst books ever written.
It consists of several contradictory smaller "books"
written by ignorant men thousands of years ago. The Bible
contains intolerance, racism, homophobia, and general beliefs
that are no more credible than fairy tales about Santa Claus.

The only difference is that people usually stop believing
in Santa Claus at an early age. But with Jesus-related
delusions, the false beliefs often last for a full life-time.

This is because many societys are nowadays pushing
Jesus-related propaganda to the members of the society.
Many people believe the Church's and priests' lies.

We have hundreds of different churches and sects, all
claiming to be the "really correct". It is one of
the worst features of the United States that it is
pretty full of religious wackos, but as far as I
know, the situation is getting a bit better.

I recently came across a study according to which the
young Americans are less religious than their parents.
Owing to the Internet, I suppose this healthy trend
will continue.

Rick, all I can do is hope that you will be free of
biblical delusions one day. It takes a lot of
soul-searching and honest effort from you, but
it *is* doable. But you are in *way deep*, that is clear.

If you cannot transition to agnosticism or atheism, please
keep "some kind of belief in some kind of God" if it helps
you to retain some kind of sanity. But definitely you should
free yourself of organized religion such as christianity
and stop spamming these newsgroups. As of now, you are not
at all mentally stable, you are a wacko.

Religion has molded an arrogant bastard out of you, and
that is why you think you are "helping" people here when
in reality you are only filling technical newsgroups with
unwanted, crazy, outdated, delusional christian spam.

Best regards,
Unto Sten

[seeplus]

On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 6:58:53 AM UTC+11, Unto Sten wrote:

> Religion has molded an arrogant bastard out of you, and
> that is why you think you are "helping" people here when
> in reality you are only filling technical newsgroups with
> unwanted, crazy, outdated, delusional christian spam.

A very good statement there BUT:

There is just no point in arguing or reasoning with Rick.
His brain just cannot accept any of that.
For years now .... he will just:
>> come back with quotes from his zombie controller's magik book.

Best you can do is get just a bit offensive with him as others do here.
At least gives you some little satisfaction.

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Unto Sten wrote:
> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing
> > his will in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect
> > on people.
>

> Rick, religion...

Christianity isn't a religion. It's a relationship with Jesus
Christ. Religion has almost nothing to do with being a Christ-
ian. The far, far more important part is the forgiveness of
sin and the new life, which changes you on the inside, and is
what saves your eternal soul.

Each person who is saved will go on to serve God in this world.
The world will never understand it, but those being saved will
understand it when their time to be saved is at hand.

If you can hear His call in your heart, rejoice and be exceed-
ingly glad, for He is reaching out to save your soul from Hell,
the greatest gift imaginable to a human being.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Mr Flibble]

On 13/01/2019 00:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Unto Sten wrote:
>> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing
>>> his will in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect
>>> on people.
>>
>> Rick, religion...
>
> Christianity isn't a religion.

From the Oxford English Dictionary:

Christianity, n.
1. The whole body of Christians, the Christian part of the world,
Christendom n. Obsolete.
2. a. The religion of Christ; the Christian faith; the system of doctrines
and precepts taught by Christ and his apostles.

So another lie from the deceitful Christian Rick the Dick.

[Jorgen Grahn]

The best thing to do is not to respond, or respond privately. If you
care about the real topic of this newsgroup, that should be obvious.

/Jorgen

--
// Jorgen Grahn <grahn@ Oo o. . .
\X/ snipabacken.se> O o .

[fir]

this is not about satisfaction but about sanity defence... it is also not qite about being offensive it is more about disenchanting dense stupidity that constitute that imbecilizing dork

[fir]

disenchanting or maybe repelling...simple ignoring dont fully work though it also is good (really bed is what half-trolls do, it is legitimization of this insane
bulshiter by treating him as legitimized user though people know it is massive spammer focused on area of spaming and fake pumping of crippled ego of a regular idiot),

btw in fact many users in usnet have some amount of dick-like disability

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 7:49:27 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 13/01/2019 00:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Unto Sten wrote:
> >> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing
> >>> his will in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect
> >>> on people.
> >>
> >> Rick, religion...
> >
> > Christianity isn't a religion.

It is a relationship. Religion is from the outside in. The relationship
He calls us to and has with us is from the inside out.

> From the Oxford English Dictionary:
>
> Christianity, n.
> 1. The whole body of Christians, the Christian part of the world,
> Christendom n. Obsolete.
> 2. a. The religion of Christ; the Christian faith; the system of doctrines
> and precepts taught by Christ and his apostles.
>

> So another lie from the deceitful Christian Rick .. .

The flesh can only see it as a religion, because it knows not
the spirit. Those who are born again see the difference between
religion and the relationship with Christ. The relationship drives
us, not any aspect of religion (save the requirements of mastering
the flesh, which requires purposeful discipline to master).

Religion and the relationship are distinctly different, and separate:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=James+1%3A27&version=KJV

27 Pure religion and undefiled before God and the
Father is this, To visit the fatherless and widows
in their affliction, and to keep himself unspotted
from the world.

It is that inner spirit-focused relationship that drives Christians:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John%204:24&version=KJV

24 God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must
worship him in spirit and in truth.

You can't come to God in your flesh:

https://www.biblegateway.com/passage/?search=John+3%3A1-17&version=KJV

Jesus speaking:

5 Jesus answered, Verily, verily, I say unto thee,
Except a man be born of water and of the Spirit,
he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.
6 That which is born of the flesh is flesh; and that
which is born of the Spirit is spirit.
7 Marvel not that I said unto thee,
Ye must be born again.

Forgiveness of sin takes away our sin and the condemnation that
goes along with it, restoring us to God's Kingdom, restoring our
spirit, restoring eternal life.

It has nothing to do with religion. Nothing. It is all about Jesus
and His ability to transfer our sin onto Himself thereby setting
us free. And once transformed, it is the relationship, not the religion,
which sustains and guides us.

Someday you will understand.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <slrnq3lmq0.1p...@frailea.sa.invalid>,
Jorgen Grahn <grahn...@snipabacken.se> wrote:
...

>The best thing to do is not to respond, or respond privately. If you
>care about the real topic of this newsgroup, that should be obvious.

Right now, these newsgroups (the C/C++ groups) are about 50% about
technical (boring) stuff and about 50% about Rick's pychoses.

I think most people find the later half the more entertaining half.

--
He continues to assert that 2 plus 2 equals 4, despite being repeatedly
told otherwise.

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <q1faqn$2vl$1...@news.xmission.com>,

Kenny McCormack <gaz...@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
>In article <slrnq3lmq0.1p...@frailea.sa.invalid>,
>Jorgen Grahn <grahn...@snipabacken.se> wrote:
>...
>>The best thing to do is not to respond, or respond privately. If you
>>care about the real topic of this newsgroup, that should be obvious.
>
>Right now, these newsgroups (the C/C++ groups) are about 50% about
>technical (boring) stuff and about 50% about Rick's pychoses.
>
>I think most people find the later half the more entertaining half.

I should add that one of the groups seems to be currently most concerned
with girls taken in from a blizzard (*) more than anything else.

(*) And the treatment and handling of hypothermia.

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:
http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/LadyChatterley

[Mr Flibble]

On 13/01/2019 11:28, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 7:49:27 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 13/01/2019 00:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 2:58:53 PM UTC-5, Unto Sten wrote:
>>>> Rick C. Hodgin <rick.c...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> It is the enemy (Satan) at work in deceived sinners, doing
>>>>> his will in them as they are unaware due to sin's effect
>>>>> on people.
>>>>
>>>> Rick, religion...
>>>
>>> Christianity isn't a religion.
>
> It is a relationship.

Christianity is a religion.

[snip tl;dr]

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <TrI_D.34153$Rq1....@fx21.fr7>,
Mr Flibble <flibbleREM...@i42.co.uk> wrote:
...
>Christianity is a religion.

Of course it is. Rick is, as usual, full of shit.

What else is new?

>[snip tl;dr]

Everything Rick posts is tl;dr;bs.

By the way, the real thing is that the word religion has taken on, among
sensible people, a negative connotation. Therefore, when marketing to
(presumably) smart people, such as you find in the Northern part of the
US and in these newsgroups, you want to downplay the word, as Rick has
done in his posts to the newsgroups. When marketing in the South, of
course, you go full on with the word, because they haven't figured out
yet what bullshit it is. They still love the word.

--
The randomly chosen signature file that would have appeared here is more than 4
lines long. As such, it violates one or more Usenet RFCs. In order to remain
in compliance with said RFCs, the actual sig can be found at the following URL:

http://user.xmission.com/~gazelle/Sigs/Noam

[Chris M. Thomasson]

On 1/13/2019 4:40 AM, Kenny McCormack wrote:
> In article <q1faqn$2vl$1...@news.xmission.com>,
> Kenny McCormack <gaz...@shell.xmission.com> wrote:
>> In article <slrnq3lmq0.1p...@frailea.sa.invalid>,
>> Jorgen Grahn <grahn...@snipabacken.se> wrote:
>> ...
>>> The best thing to do is not to respond, or respond privately. If you
>>> care about the real topic of this newsgroup, that should be obvious.
>>
>> Right now, these newsgroups (the C/C++ groups) are about 50% about
>> technical (boring) stuff and about 50% about Rick's pychoses.
>>
>> I think most people find the later half the more entertaining half.
>
> I should add that one of the groups seems to be currently most concerned
> with girls taken in from a blizzard (*) more than anything else.
>
> (*) And the treatment and handling of hypothermia.
>

I had a limited conversation with very smart people wrt a seqlock and
C++. If you want on topic, read _all_ of this:

https://groups.google.com/d/topic/comp.lang.c++/NBZhxyzLUH8/discussion

Very smart people are in that thread.

[Keith Thompson]

Please don't. Replying to him just encourages him to post more,
which disrupts the newsgroup for those of us who come here to
discuss C++.

I don't see Rick's postings, but it's hard for my killfile to keep
up with all the people who feel the need to reply to him publicly.

--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) k...@mib.org <http://www.ghoti.net/~kst>
Will write code for food.
"We must do something. This is something. Therefore, we must do this."
-- Antony Jay and Jonathan Lynn, "Yes Minister"

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <ln8szod...@kst-u.example.com>,
Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> wrote:
...

>> Best you can do is get just a bit offensive with him as others do here.
>> At least gives you some little satisfaction.
>
>Please don't. Replying to him just encourages him to post more,
>which disrupts the newsgroup for those of us who come here to
>discuss C++.
>
>I don't see Rick's postings, but it's hard for my killfile to keep
>up with all the people who feel the need to reply to him publicly.

You should probably look into setting up your newsreader to have a
whitelist (i.e., a list of the few people who post here whose stuff you
actually will deign to read) rather than trying to maintain a blacklist.

--
Faith doesn't give you the answers; it just stops you from asking the questions.

[seeplus]

On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 9:22:17 AM UTC+11, Keith Thompson wrote:

> seeplus <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@ gmail.com> writes:

> Please don't. Replying to him just encourages him to post more,
> which disrupts the newsgroup for those of us who come here to
> discuss C++.
>
> I don't see Rick's postings, but it's hard for my killfile to keep
> up with all the people who feel the need to reply to him publicly.

NO.
We frequently get that old "don't respond to him and he will go away".

That has never worked in the past, never will.
He is a dedicated "teacher" and like those other annoyances they
will always pop back on groups producing clutter.

At least people doing some very serious arguing with him has bought
a little quiet every few months.
Also sometimes this gives an insight into his mind so maybe showing just
some way a professional could get him better, and produces some
knowledge of these otherwise intelligent people walking amongst us.
Handy to know.

Why are people so hung up about OT????
This "-plonk- welcome to my killfile" is so weird and pointless.
In any news reader it takes 800ms to PgDn three times and skip a post.
I can spare that.

Do not open posts with obviously OT headers.

[Keith Thompson]

seeplus <board...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 9:22:17 AM UTC+11, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> seeplus <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@ gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Please don't. Replying to him just encourages him to post more,
>> which disrupts the newsgroup for those of us who come here to
>> discuss C++.
>>
>> I don't see Rick's postings, but it's hard for my killfile to keep
>> up with all the people who feel the need to reply to him publicly.
>
> NO.

Yes.

> We frequently get that old "don't respond to him and he will go away".

He won't go away whether we respond to him or not. I've solved the
direct problem for myself; as far as I'm concerned, he effectively
doesn't exist. The responses continue to be annoying. (And they're
not all in threads with obviously off-topic subject lines.)

You won't accomplish anything by publicly engaging him. (And I
probably won't accomplish anything by talking to you about it.)

[...]

[Kenny McCormack]

In article <ln4labe...@kst-u.example.com>,

Keith Thompson <ks...@mib.org> wrote:
>seeplus <board...@gmail.com> writes:
>> On Monday, January 14, 2019 at 9:22:17 AM UTC+11, Keith Thompson wrote:
>>> seeplus <xxxxxxxxxxxxx@ gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> Please don't. Replying to him just encourages him to post more,
>>> which disrupts the newsgroup for those of us who come here to
>>> discuss C++.
>>>
>>> I don't see Rick's postings, but it's hard for my killfile to keep
>>> up with all the people who feel the need to reply to him publicly.
>>
>> NO.
>
>Yes.

NO

>> We frequently get that old "don't respond to him and he will go away".
>
>He won't go away whether we respond to him or not. I've solved the
>direct problem for myself; as far as I'm concerned, he effectively
>doesn't exist. The responses continue to be annoying. (And they're
>not all in threads with obviously off-topic subject lines.)
>
>You won't accomplish anything by publicly engaging him. (And I
>probably won't accomplish anything by talking to you about it.)

That's pretty much what it boils down to, isn't it. You say one thing,
your opponents say another. Who's to say? Who's the judge? Answer: No one.

As I said before:

You should probably look into setting up your newsreader to have a
whitelist (i.e., a list of the few people who post here whose stuff you
actually will deign to read) rather than trying to maintain a blacklist.

--

The last time a Republican cared about you, you were a fetus.

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 10:04:32 AM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 13/01/2019 11:28, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 7:49:27 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >> On 13/01/2019 00:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > Christianity isn't a religion.
> > It is a relationship.
>
> Christianity is a religion.
>
> [snip tl;dr]

Here's a picture for you. Very few words for your apparently
limited mind and/or attention span:

https://mobile.twitter.com/ApologiaForce/status/1084960144134455296/photo/1

"I thought atheism was a lack of belief."
"Wrong. It's a positive belief in Naturalism and it
has a burden of proof."

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Mr Flibble]

On 15/01/2019 03:15, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Sunday, January 13, 2019 at 10:04:32 AM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 13/01/2019 11:28, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> On Saturday, January 12, 2019 at 7:49:27 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>>>> On 13/01/2019 00:33, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> Christianity isn't a religion.
>>> It is a relationship.
>>
>> Christianity is a religion.
>>
>> [snip tl;dr]
>
> Here's a picture for you. Very few words for your apparently
> limited mind and/or attention span:

Quite the contrary: everything you write in this newsgroup is worthless;
it has absolutely no value whatsoever which is why I won't read more than
a couple of sentences of it.

>
> https://mobile.twitter.com/ApologiaForce/status/1084960144134455296/photo/1
>
> "I thought atheism was a lack of belief."
> "Wrong. It's a positive belief in Naturalism and it
> has a burden of proof."

As usual you are in error. There are several forms of atheism with the
most common form being negative/weak atheism which is a lack of belief in
deities (so certainly has no burden of proof). What you are talking about
is positive/strong atheism which is active disbelief in deities (I am such
an atheist).

Also since when do beliefs require proof? Only non-self evident claims of
knowledge/fact require proof IMHO.

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:02:22 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> Quite the contrary: everything you write in this newsgroup is worthless;
> it has absolutely no value whatsoever which is why I won't read more than
> a couple of sentences of it.

There will come a day when you will realize it's actually the
reverse of what you've said here. My prayer for you is that
happens on this side of the grave.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Mr Flibble]

On 15/01/2019 17:06, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:02:22 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> Quite the contrary: everything you write in this newsgroup is worthless;
>> it has absolutely no value whatsoever which is why I won't read more than
>> a couple of sentences of it.
>
> There will come a day when you will realize it's actually the
> reverse of what you've said here.

Never going to happen.

> My prayer for you is that happens on this side of the grave.

Instead of praying why don't you jerk off? I recommend gay porn.

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 15/01/2019 17:06, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > There will come a day when you will realize it's actually the
> > reverse of what you've said here.
> Never going to happen.

I certainly hope that's not true. And so do you, Leigh, even
though today you can't see it. They day will come when you will
yearn, with greatest yearning, for one more hour to read all
those [tl;dr] posts you ignored. Every one of them will tear
through your soul like fire on Judgment Day. You will look at
me and the realization that I was trying to help you will sink
in, and you will weep like you've never weeped before ... but
it will be too late for you. You'll be carted off by angels
and tossed into the lake of fire, never to be heard from again,
and only writhing in agony for all of eternity.

I would spare you from that day, but it's not up to me. I've
done my part. Until you're willing to do yours ... none of my
efforts will affect you. You must seek to change from within.

> > My prayer for you is that happens on this side of the grave.

> Instead of praying why don't you ...

Because I want my efforts toward you to bear fruit and not be a
mere waste of time and energy. You are valuable, Leigh. If
you weren't, I wouldn't waste my time. But you are, and I invest
time into you because of it. I want you to be saved and not be
destroyed.

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Mr Flibble]

On 15/01/2019 17:31, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
>> On 15/01/2019 17:06, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
>>> There will come a day when you will realize it's actually the
>>> reverse of what you've said here.
>> Never going to happen.
>
> I certainly hope that's not true.

[snip tl;dr]

Fuck off you obtuse egregious fucktarded cockwomble.

[Rick C. Hodgin]

On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:35:41 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> On 15/01/2019 17:31, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> > On Tuesday, January 15, 2019 at 12:24:25 PM UTC-5, Mr Flibble wrote:
> >> On 15/01/2019 17:06, Rick C. Hodgin wrote:
> >>> There will come a day when you will realize it's actually the
> >>> reverse of what you've said here.
> >> Never going to happen.
> > I certainly hope that's not true.
> [snip tl;dr]
>

> .. you obtuse egregious .. .. .

https://tinyurl.com/ybrnwljs

--
Rick C. Hodgin

[Mr Flibble]

Sorry but you aren't my type mate.