This Bonita Montero is stupid

[Ramine]

Hello,

This Bonita Montero is stupid because she thinks that i am a programmer
that have to do larger projects..

Read again:

You don't seem to understand that i am not a programmer..

I have a diploma in Microelectronics and i have succeeded one year of
mathematics at the university level, i have done assembler and pascal in
Microelectronics , this is why i am inventing algorithms,
i am not seeking to do bigger projects.


You see ?

You don't understand about me.


Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.

[Jerry Stuckle]

No, you are the stupid one, as you have repeatedly proven. Bonita is
right on target.

I don't know how you could have gotten a diploma in Microelectronics
with only one year or Mathematics at the university level. Any degree
in the United States requires more - even a degree in Sociology. My
guess is got your "degree" from a Cracker Jacks box.

You may have done assembler and pascal - so what. The last time I
checked, I could name 18 languages I have programmed in over the last 50
years. And I still don't consider myself an expert.

And being a "white arab" means absolutely nothing - other than you need
to use your heritage in a weak attempt to justify yourself.

You may think you are showing your brilliance with all of your posts
here - but be assured, to people who really know what's going on (like
Bonita), you are only making a bigger fool of yourself with every post.
If you're trying to prove to a respective employer or client how smart
you are, you're doing just the opposite. No one with an IQ above a pet
rock would hire you.

--
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
jstu...@attglobal.net
==================

[Ramine]

You are defending this Bonita Montero because she is female , but she is
stupid !

Because she has made a big mistake that shows that she is not
qualified to do real-time and safe-critical system programming

She has for example assumed that i was a software engineer,
but i was not a software engineer , i was a technician in
Microelectronics who has done pascal and assembler programming in
Microelectronics, and i have also succeeded one year of mathematics
at the university level, that means that i have done pure mathematics
at the university level in mathematics, i have done also mathematics
when i have studied to get a diploma in Microelectronics, and this
why i have started to invent many synchronization algorithms ,
and i have started to give code for real-time programming..

Here is some of my inventions that i have ported to C++:

My C++ synchronization objects library

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library

[Ramine]

On 3/18/2017 5:57 PM, Jerry Stuckle wrote:

Read again, i correct:

You are defending this Bonita Montero because she is female , but she is
stupid !

Because she has made a big mistake that shows that she is not

qualified to do real-time and safety-critical system programming

She has for example assumed that i was a software engineer,
but i was not a software engineer , i was a technician in
Microelectronics who has done pascal and assembler programming in
Microelectronics, and i have also succeeded one year of mathematics
at the university level, that means that i have done pure mathematics
at the university level in mathematics, i have done also mathematics
when i have studied to get a diploma in Microelectronics, and this
why i have started to invent many synchronization algorithms ,
and i have started to give code for real-time programming..

Here is some of my inventions that i have ported to C++:

My C++ synchronization objects library

https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library

[Rick C. Hodgin]

Ramine, you are the first person like you I've ever encountered.
I've never met another like you. A new benchmark exists within
my preception of people because of you.

Let me ask you a serious question: Do you think calling people
names and citing your credentials over and over is truly the best
way to advance your cause?

I would suggest there are better ways, and that right now you are
harming yourself irreparably in many people's eyes. They will no
longer even consider anything you say because of this recent
outburst.

I would advise you to apologize to Bonita, and many others, and
quietly switch from your current state of frenzied poster, to become
one of student learner, where you read silently the various posts,
and ask questions when you don't understand something.

And if you want to correct deficiencies in your love of your fellow
man (so you don't make mistakes like calling people "stupid"),
then study the man Jesus Christ from the book of John. You will
see how He met aggression and hatred even with teaching from
a deep love for His creation.

You have merit and value, Ramine. But you are not exhibiting or
embracing that potential. It will be a more difficult path to remain
on the one you're on. I advise switching quickly, and permanently.

Thank you,
Rick C. Hodgin

[Jerry Stuckle]

No, I am defending here because she is right. And she's a lot more
intelligent than you are - that is quite obvious.

> Because she has made a big mistake that shows that she is not
> qualified to do real-time and safe-critical system programming
>

She's a hell of a lot more qualified to do ANY programming then you are.

> She has for example assumed that i was a software engineer,
> but i was not a software engineer , i was a technician in
> Microelectronics who has done pascal and assembler programming in
> Microelectronics, and i have also succeeded one year of mathematics
> at the university level, that means that i have done pure mathematics
> at the university level in mathematics, i have done also mathematics
> when i have studied to get a diploma in Microelectronics, and this
> why i have started to invent many synchronization algorithms ,
> and i have started to give code for real-time programming..
>

You've called yourself "an experienced programmer". And she did not
call you a "software engineer".

> Here is some of my inventions that i have ported to C++:
>
> My C++ synchronization objects library
>
> https://sites.google.com/site/aminer68/c-synchronization-objects-library
>
>
> Thank you,
> Amine Moulay Ramdane.
>
>

It was crap in the original language, and it's even worse in C++. Any
student out of my advanced C++ class could do better. And they wouldn't
have to keep posting "fixes" because they'd get it right.

[Jerry Stuckle]

On 3/18/2017 6:14 PM, Ramine wrote:

>
>
> Read again, i correct:
>
>

<Bullshit snipped>

No need to correct. You've already shown how stoopid you are. Calling
you an idiot would be an insult to idiots.