On Monday, 26 March 2018 19:35:24 UTC+3, Pvr Pasupuleti wrote:
>
https://unacademy.com/lesson/controlling-loop-statements/3QOIQ506
That
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/388242/the-definitive-c-book-guide-and-list
makes huge understatement how poor the situation is:
| Unlike many other programming languages, which are often picked up on
| the go from tutorials found on the Internet, few are able to quickly
| pick up C++ without studying a well-written C++ book. It is way too
| big and complex for doing this. In fact, it is so big and complex,
| that *there* *are* *very* *many* *very* *bad* *C++* *books* out there.
| And we are not talking about bad style, but things like sporting
| glaringly obvious factual errors and promoting abysmally bad
| programming styles.
Your site is too terrible even for to be parody of described bad C++
textbooks. Why every next moron tries to add more to that nightmare?
Why none of them attempts to learn C++ before starting to teach it?