Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Yet read again, i correct..
7 views
Skip to first unread message
Sky89
May 19, 2018, 12:20:54 PM5/19/18
to
Hello...
Yet read again, i correct..
I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned ,
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this
exception of ERangeError etc.
But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++
and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems.
You can carefully read the following, it is very important:
https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
Yet read again, i correct..
I think that Delphi and FreePascal like ADA come with range checking and
Run-time checks that catch conversion from negative signed to unsigned ,
and catch out-of-bounds indices of dynamic and static arrays and catch
arithmetic overflow etc. and you can also dynamically catch this
exception of ERangeError etc.
But C++ and C don't have range checking etc. so that's not good in C++
and C because it is not good for safety-critical systems.
You can carefully read the following, it is very important:
https://critical.eschertech.com/2010/07/07/run-time-checks-are-they-worth-it/
Thank you,
Amine Moulay Ramdane.
0 new messages