Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Default constructor and defaulted/deleted special members
0 views
Skip to first unread message
Alexander Gutenev
Nov 24, 2009, 3:38:42 PM11/24/09
to
This definition of copy constructor prevents from generation of the
default constructor:
default constructor:
struct X1 {
X1(X1 const&) {}
}
Would the below definitions also prevent from generation of the
default constructor?
struct X2 {
X2(X2 const&) = delete;
};
struct X3 {
X3(X3 const&) = default;
};
--
[ See http://www.gotw.ca/resources/clcm.htm for info about ]
[ comp.lang.c++.moderated. First time posters: Do this! ]
CornedBee
Nov 25, 2009, 9:16:32 AM11/25/09
to
On Nov 24, 9:38 pm, Alexander Gutenev <gute...@gmail.com> wrote:
> This definition of copy constructor prevents from generation of the
> default constructor:
>
> struct X1 {
> X1(X1 const&) {}
>
> }
>
> Would the below definitions also prevent from generation of the
> default constructor?
> This definition of copy constructor prevents from generation of the
> default constructor:
>
> struct X1 {
> X1(X1 const&) {}
>
> }
>
> Would the below definitions also prevent from generation of the
> default constructor?
Yes, every user-declared constructor inhibits the generation, no
matter what its definition looks like.
Sebastian
0 new messages