Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

It's official! Visual Basic 5.0 to be released in March

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Pascal Vermeulen

unread,
Feb 15, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/15/97
to

As you maybe know by now, Visual Basic 5.0 will be released in march.
Find out it's hot new features on my special VB 5.0 pages.
I have converted the Microsoft fact sheets to HTML (they load much faster)
so you can read all about it without the fuzz of downloading 1MB files at
Microsoft.

--
Pascal Vermeulen

http://www.ping.be/Visual_Basic_Central

MARCH13

unread,
Feb 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/16/97
to

On 15 Feb 1997 21:29:11 GMT, "Pascal Vermeulen"
<Pascal.V...@ping.be> wrote:

>As you maybe know by now, Visual Basic 5.0 will be released in march.

Of which year?

Daniel Garlans

unread,
Feb 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/17/97
to

"Pascal Vermeulen" <Pascal.V...@ping.be> wrote:

>As you maybe know by now, Visual Basic 5.0 will be released in march.

>Find out it's hot new features on my special VB 5.0 pages.
>I have converted the Microsoft fact sheets to HTML (they load much faster)
>so you can read all about it without the fuzz of downloading 1MB files at
>Microsoft.

go buy a copy of VBPJ at your local newsstand and look at all the
articles about what it's able to do already, wher eto get it,
benifits, drawbacks, how to convert to and from...etc etc etc
..wow, nice crosspost...


Thomas P. Margraff

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to

>where to get it,
vb5.com is accepting advance orders for all versions
of Visual Basic 5.0 and the forthcoming Mastering
Visual Basic 5.0 CD from Microsoft.

We are also giving away a free copy of
Visual Basic 5.0 Professional Edition in
an online sweepstakes.

tom margraff
to...@vb5.com
http://www.vb5.com


mike allen

unread,
Feb 23, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/23/97
to Thomas P. Margraff


Could you please post the proper address or let us know if the server is
down, or when it'll be open?

Thomas P. Margraff

unread,
Feb 24, 1997, 3:00:00 AM2/24/97
to

hi mike,

>Could you please post the proper address or let us know if the server is
>down, or when it'll be open?

Apologies for the inconvience but the server was temporarily down.
The URL is correct: http://www.vb5.com

Thanks,
Tom
to...@vb5.com

mike allen <c5...@unb.ca> wrote in article <3310ED...@unb.ca>...

Scott Kelley

unread,
Mar 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/1/97
to

On 24 Feb 1997 04:42:29 GMT, "Thomas P. Margraff" <t...@win-corp.com>
wrote:

I tried it. They seem to be back up. Pretty cool sweepstake.


Paul Thornett

unread,
Mar 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/10/97
to

Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?

Jonathan Wood

unread,
Mar 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/10/97
to

Paul,

> Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?

Nope.

Look for 64-bit VB within the next few years.

--
Jonathan Wood
SoftCircuits Programming
http://www.softcircuits.com


David White

unread,
Mar 10, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/10/97
to

Paul Thornett wrote:
>
> Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?It is my understanding that VB 5.0 will only support 32-bit platforms.
Apparantly everyone is switching to WIN 95 or NT !?!?!

Stephen P. Hamilton

unread,
Mar 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/11/97
to

No, VB% is 32 Bit only

Paul Thornett <pa...@hare.net.au> wrote in article
<01bc2d7d$d3b3a920$2ddd3fcb@pro200>...

Stuart Mackereth

unread,
Mar 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/11/97
to

Paul Thornett wrote:
>
> Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?

Nope.

---
Stuart Mackereth <smack...@syfrets.co.za>
Technical Design & Program Lead
MD&A Business Information Services
(h) <stu...@iafrica.com>

lcsf

unread,
Mar 11, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/11/97
to

Look what Norton CrashGuard say about VB32 - 16 BIT APP!!!!

Jonathan Wood wrote:
>
> Paul,


>
> > Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?
>
> Nope.
>

Bill

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

Stuart Mackereth wrote:

>
> Paul Thornett wrote:
> >
> > Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?
>
> Nope.
>
> ---

Does that mean VB5's IDE will only run under 32-bit or does it mean you
would not be able to compile a 16 bit program. If that's the case what
about win32s so I can write progs for win3.11 as well as 95?

Jim Ferguson

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

Bill

>Does that mean VB5's IDE will only run under 32-bit or does it mean you
>would not be able to compile a 16 bit program.

VB5 runs only on NT or Win95. Programs written with VB5 run only on NT
or Win95.


-- Jim Ferguson, FMS
http://www.fmsinc.com

liew

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

Jonathan Wood wrote:
>
> Paul,
Hi,

Need help from any one of u...


Set rsInvoice = MyDB.OpenRecordset _
("SELECT DISTINCTROW Invoice.InvoiceNo, Invoice.OrderNo,
Invoice.ActualTotal, " & _
"Invoice.Total, Invoice.Date, Invoice.Printed, Customer.Name FROM "
& _
"(Invoice INNER JOIN [Order] ON Invoice.OrderNo =
Order.OrderNo)INNER JOIN " & _
"Customer ON Order.CustomerID = Customer.CustomerID WHERE " & _
"((Invoice.Printed=No) AND (Invoice.ReadyForCollection=Yes) AND " &
_
"(Order.EmployeeID='" & UserID & "'))", dbOpenDynaset)

rsInvoice.LockEdits = False

MyDB is set to not exclusive and not readonly

When the above statement was executed..., other program that wants to
update table Order and table Customer
get a locking error message but table Invoice do not get the locking
error.

regards

Bill

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

> VB5 runs only on NT or Win95. Programs written with VB5 run only on NT
> or Win95.

So to port a program to run under WIN 3.1 written in VB5 would I
recompile it under 16-bit VB4? Would there be many incompatibilities?

Bill

Paul Clement

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

Bill <sot...@together.net> wrote:

->> VB5 runs only on NT or Win95. Programs written with VB5 run only
on NT
->> or Win95.
->
->So to port a program to run under WIN 3.1 written in VB5 would I
->recompile it under 16-bit VB4? Would there be many
incompatibilities?

I wouldn't recommend attempting to port from a VB 5.0 project to a
16-bit VB 4.0 project directly. There are too many compatibility
issues.

I would create a separate project for your 16-bit VB 4.0 version.


Paul
~~~~
pcle...@ameritech.net

Jonathan Wood

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

Bill,

> So to port a program to run under WIN 3.1 written in VB5 would I

> recompile it under 16-bit VB4? Would there be many incompatibilities?

Yes, VB5 files will be saved in a different format and will include
statements not supported by VB4.

VB5 is 32-bit. If you plan 16-bit development, I don't recommend VB5.

Dick Grier

unread,
Mar 12, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/12/97
to

>>
Will it work with WIN32s?
<<

No. But, neither would VB4/32.

--
Dick Grier
Hard & Software
12962 West Louisiana Avenue
Lakewood, CO 80228
303-986-2179 (voice)
303-986-3143 (fax)
email: 10407...@compuserve.com
Dick_...@msn.com

Jens Peter Karlsen

unread,
Mar 13, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/13/97
to

Will it work with WIN32s?

Regards Jens Peter Karlsen. Microsoft Frontpage MVP.

On Tue, 11 Mar 1997 05:20:04 -0800, "Stephen P. Hamilton"
<E2P...@msn.com> wrote:

>No, VB% is 32 Bit only
>
>Paul Thornett <pa...@hare.net.au> wrote in article
><01bc2d7d$d3b3a920$2ddd3fcb@pro200>...

Wayne Swanson

unread,
Mar 13, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/13/97
to

Bill wrote:

> Does that mean VB5's IDE will only run under 32-bit or does it mean you

> would not be able to compile a 16 bit program. If that's the case what
> about win32s so I can write progs for win3.11 as well as 95?

The question is, "Does it surprise you that you'll be locked out of
development for the last version of Windows"? I'm sure VB6 will lock you
out of Win95 development as soon as they want you to stay on NT.

-----------------------------------------------------------
Wayne Swanson
email: spam_w...@daktel.com <--- remove the "spam_"
-----------------------------------------------------------

Unknown

unread,
Mar 14, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/14/97
to

On Thu, 13 Mar 1997 17:06:58 -0600, Wayne Swanson
<Ps...@Tech-Center.com> wrote:

>Bill wrote:
>
>> Does that mean VB5's IDE will only run under 32-bit or does it mean you
>> would not be able to compile a 16 bit program. If that's the case what
>> about win32s so I can write progs for win3.11 as well as 95?
>
>The question is, "Does it surprise you that you'll be locked out of
>development for the last version of Windows"? I'm sure VB6 will lock you
>out of Win95 development as soon as they want you to stay on NT.
>

What do you mean the latest version of Windows, W95? I'm sure VB5
will do quite well on W95. Did this crap need to be posted to 50
newsgroups???

In America, CA Prop 209 (below) is allegedly unconstitutional:
"The state shall not discriminate against, or grant preferential
treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex,
color, ethnicity, or national origin in the operation of public
employment, public education, or public contracting."

Benjamin H. Andersen

unread,
Mar 14, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/14/97
to

Does office 97 run on Win 3.1? If it is 32 bit man, it is 32 bit, as in Win
95 and NT
--
B. Andersen
PlaNET Technology Corporation
http://www.planettechnology.com


Bill <sot...@together.net> wrote in article
<332647...@together.net>...


> Stuart Mackereth wrote:
> >
> > Paul Thornett wrote:
> > >

> > > Will VB5 continue to work on 16-bit as well as 32-bit platforms?
> >

> > Nope.
> >
> > ---

Alexis Rios Negron

unread,
Mar 16, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/16/97
to

Visual Basic 5.0 is already available:

Professional edition was released on Feb 03, 1997
Enterprise edition was release on Feb 23, 1997
Custom Creation Edition was released on March 03, 1997

Only for 32 bits. 16 bits is over. They have to move on. 64 bits is coming
in the near feature, believe it or not.

Benjamin H. Andersen <BHAnd...@msn.com> wrote in article
<01bc30c1$d25776a0$4792...@nostradamus.planettechnology.com>...

les...@creatsoft.com

unread,
Mar 17, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/17/97
to

This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

------=_NextPart_000_01BC32C2.AA9F6BB0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

Is there a way in VBCCE to create ActiveX Data control, based on Remote
Data control, and visible for the DataSource property of DBCombo, DBList,
DBGrid ?


liew <li...@pc.jaring.my> wrote in article <332793...@pc.jaring.my>...

------=_NextPart_000_01BC32C2.AA9F6BB0
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<html><head></head><BODY bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><p><font size=3D2 =
color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial">Is there a way in VBCCE &nbsp;to create =
ActiveX Data control, based on Remote<br>Data control, and visible for =
the DataSource property of DBCombo, DBList,<br>DBGrid =
?<br><br><br><br><br>liew &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>li...@pc.jaring.my</u><font color=3D"#000000">&gt; =
wrote in article &lt;<font =
color=3D"#0000FF"><u>332793...@pc.jaring.my</u><font =
color=3D"#000000">&gt;...<br>&gt; Jonathan Wood wrote:<br>&gt; &gt; =
<br>&gt; &gt; Paul,<br>&gt; Hi,<br>&gt; <br>&gt; Need help from any one =
of u...<br>&gt; <br>&gt; <br>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;Set rsInvoice =
=3D MyDB.OpenRecordset _<br>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;(&quot;SELECT =
DISTINCTROW Invoice.InvoiceNo, Invoice.OrderNo,<br>&gt; =
Invoice.ActualTotal, &quot; &amp; _<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;Invoice.Total, Invoice.Date, =
Invoice.Printed, Customer.Name FROM &quot;<br>&gt; &amp; _<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;(Invoice INNER JOIN [Order] ON =
Invoice.OrderNo =3D<br>&gt; Order.OrderNo)INNER JOIN &quot; &amp; =
_<br>&gt; &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;Customer ON Order.CustomerID =3D =
Customer.CustomerID WHERE &quot; &amp; _<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;((Invoice.Printed=3DNo) AND =
(Invoice.ReadyForCollection=3DYes) AND &quot; &amp;<br>&gt; _<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&quot;(Order.EmployeeID=3D'&quot; &amp; UserID =
&amp; &quot;'))&quot;, dbOpenDynaset)<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<br>&gt; =
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;rsInvoice.LockEdits =3D False<br>&gt; <br>&gt; =
MyDB is set to not exclusive and not readonly<br>&gt; <br>&gt; When the =
above statement was executed..., other program that wants to<br>&gt; =
update table Order and table Customer<br>&gt; get a locking error =
message but table Invoice do not get the locking<br>&gt; error.<br>&gt; =
<br>&gt; regards<br>&gt; <br>&gt; </p>
</font></font></font></font></font></body></html>
------=_NextPart_000_01BC32C2.AA9F6BB0--


Viki French

unread,
Mar 18, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/18/97
to

Alexis Rios Negron wrote:

Actually you are wrong. Those are the dates that the products went to
production. Only select individuals such as MSDN subscribers have VB5
as of right now. VB5 will be relesed tomorrow (WED). This is an
official Microsoft Statement that was made last week at the Visual Basic
Developers Summit.

As for the 32 bit, you are correct. There is more to it that that
though, but then I would be violating my non-disclosure stament. (But
Electroid elec...@gte.net doesn't have a NDS agreement with Microsoft
<hint hint>)

Viki French


David C. Bost

unread,
Mar 19, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/19/97
to

VB5 EE was not released, it was announced. Look for the release to be
tomorrow (along with VC 5, VJ 1.1, Visual Interdev, etc) at DevDays.

On 16 Mar 1997 14:59:53 GMT, "Alexis Rios Negron" <ari...@prtc.net>
wrote:

>Visual Basic 5.0 is already available:
>
>Professional edition was released on Feb 03, 1997
>Enterprise edition was release on Feb 23, 1997
>Custom Creation Edition was released on March 03, 1997
>


---------------------------------
David C. Bost (db...@solpart.com)
Solution Partners, Inc.
Chicago, USA

Kaplan

unread,
Mar 28, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/28/97
to eus.e...@memousa.ericsson.se

They weren't released then, microsoft just made it seem that way. They
were all released at Developer Days. I was actually one of the first
people to have VB5, I got it free for being interviewed at DevDays.

Jared Kaplan

Brian

unread,
Mar 29, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/29/97
to

I ordered from VBxtras and got it the day before DevDays... maybe
everyone on their waiting list did.
--
- Brian Hutchison
(Reply e-mail will not work, it has been spoofed to thwart spammers.)

Kaplan <JKa...@concentric.net> wrote in article
<333C0E...@concentric.net>...

David A. Walkington

unread,
Mar 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/30/97
to

I got EE sent to me by snailmail 2 days before DevDays as a marketing beta.
Have I been super impressed or what? This is the single biggest shift in VB
ever and I've been using VB since day 1 of VB1 launch.

Andrew L Arnott

unread,
Mar 30, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/30/97
to

64 bits? Is the 32 bit world's days numbered? I guess that means it will
be for Pentium and better only?

Alexis Rios Negron <ari...@prtc.net> wrote in article
<01bc3211$8da40220$5c4492cc@alexis1>...


> Visual Basic 5.0 is already available:
>
> Professional edition was released on Feb 03, 1997
> Enterprise edition was release on Feb 23, 1997
> Custom Creation Edition was released on March 03, 1997
>

Steven Pringels

unread,
Mar 31, 1997, 3:00:00 AM3/31/97
to


Andrew L Arnott <and...@pcinternet.com> wrote in article
<01bc3d59$4e332690$0d1202cf@andrew>...


> 64 bits? Is the 32 bit world's days numbered? I guess that means it
will
> be for Pentium and better only?
>

Yep that is true, Well not that 32 bit will be gone very soon. You see,
Digital's Alpha processor runs with an 64 bit architecture and it much
faster than Intel when run in native mode. Intel can not sit back and watch
that to happen. The next generation of Intel's processor is codenamed
Merced. We will see what it brings. Oh BTW, don't buy a pentium with MMX
technology. It's better to invest that money into an Pentium Pro, it is
still much faster if you run 32 bit applications. An even better solution
is to buy and Alpha pricetag. 5000 dollars.

Visual Basic 5.0 runs on a 486 aswell. If you order the professional
edition you get the Windows NT workstation 4.01 with it. Not bad. BTW.
educational pricing of VB50 is 119 dollars instead of the 400+ dollars if
you buy it at your normal softwareretailer

Steven
spri...@gte.net


Ron Schwarz

unread,
Apr 1, 1997, 3:00:00 AM4/1/97
to

On 30 Mar 1997 01:09:33 GMT, "David A. Walkington"
<xd...@dial.pipex.com> wrote:

>I got EE sent to me by snailmail 2 days before DevDays as a marketing beta.
>Have I been super impressed or what? This is the single biggest shift in VB
>ever and I've been using VB since day 1 of VB1 launch.

Wow. I just got EE today (via Airborne) as part of the Tech beta.

>Kaplan <JKa...@concentric.net> wrote in article
><333C0E...@concentric.net>...
>> They weren't released then, microsoft just made it seem that way. They
>> were all released at Developer Days. I was actually one of the first
>> people to have VB5, I got it free for being interviewed at DevDays.
>>
>> Jared Kaplan
>>

--
Swap dots and ats to reply.

What did the devil say when the first email spammer showed up in hell?
"There goes the neighborhood!"

Due to a bug in my mailer, unsolicited commercial email will be
returned to sender and sender's administrator tenfold.


0 new messages