Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

best parallel array language

138 views
Skip to first unread message

rusi

unread,
Oct 19, 2012, 3:12:42 AM10/19/12
to
Are there any Apls (or related array languages like J) which have good
parallel implementations?

Googling around I find http://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/leave/leave/
but it does not seem implemented.

And there is K http://www.kx.com/

Any others?

Aaron W. Hsu

unread,
Oct 19, 2012, 8:42:56 PM10/19/12
to
I am currently in the process of creating a high-performance, parallel APL
as my research. I anticipate having something that people can use and play
with sometime next year. It will basically be APL.

--
Aaron W. Hsu | arc...@sacrideo.us | http://www.sacrideo.us
Programming is just another word for the Lost Art of Thinking.

rusi

unread,
Oct 21, 2012, 1:16:16 AM10/21/12
to
On Oct 20, 5:42 am, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us> wrote:
> On Fri, 19 Oct 2012 03:12:42 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Are there any Apls (or related array languages like J) which have good
> > parallel implementations?
>
> > Googling around I findhttp://www.cs.trinity.edu/~jhowland/leave/leave/
> > but it does not seem implemented.
>
> > And there is Khttp://www.kx.com/
>
> > Any others?
>
> I am currently in the process of creating a high-performance, parallel APL
> as my research. I anticipate having something that people can use and play
> with sometime next year. It will basically be APL.


Please let me know when it materializes.
Any chance in next 6 months?

Aaron W. Hsu

unread,
Oct 22, 2012, 12:32:00 AM10/22/12
to
On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:16:16 -0400, rusi <rusto...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Please let me know when it materializes.
> Any chance in next 6 months?

There is a good chance that I will have something up by then. Could you
let me know a bit more about what you are hoping to do with such a
parallel APL?

rusi

unread,
Oct 22, 2012, 1:18:41 AM10/22/12
to
On Oct 22, 9:32 am, "Aaron W. Hsu" <arcf...@sacrideo.us> wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 01:16:16 -0400, rusi <rustompm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Please let me know when it materializes.
> > Any chance in next 6 months?
>
> There is a good chance that I will have something up by then. Could you
> let me know a bit more about what you are hoping to do with such a
> parallel APL?
>
> --
> Aaron W. Hsu | arcf...@sacrideo.us |http://www.sacrideo.us
> Programming is just another word for the Lost Art of Thinking.

We have to deliver in about 7-8 months -- the chosen language is
Erlang. Because I am an old functional programmer -- Lisp, Haskell and
its predecessors, (a bit of Apl) -- I am on the team. However I
suspect that the choice has been made without regard to the difference
between concurrency and parallelism (eg
http://existentialtype.wordpress.com/2011/03/17/parallelism-is-not-concurrency/
)

So having a well-thought properly implemented (data)parallel language
would probably help to point out in pragmatic terms the issues.

And so... my question of '6 months' is not really accurate -- if we
dont have it now, its probably not much use for this project :-)

Anyway thanks again for offering. Maybe for some other project??
0 new messages