Thomas <fantome.foru...@free.fr.invalid> writes:
> In article <
86czdu1...@stephe-leake.org>,
> Stephen Leake <
stephe...@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
>
>> Thomas <fantome.foru...@free.fr.invalid> writes:
>>
>> > In article <
86ilnmu...@stephe-leake.org>,
>> > Stephen Leake <
stephe...@stephe-leake.org> wrote:
>> >
>> >> Thomas <fantome.foru...@free.fr.invalid> writes:
>> >>
>> >> > i would say that AGPL is even better, but ALGPL is missing.
>> >>
>> >> "better" by what metric?
>> >
>> > it allows you to access sources even when you use it only via a server,
>> > not directly on your computer. no other change.
>>
>> That states a feature of the license; it does not say why you think that
>> is a good thing.
>>
>> GPL explicitly does not allow that, because it means you do not control
>> the software you are using, which is considered the primary requirement
>> for Free Software.
>>
>> There are times when servers are a good thing (email, git host), but
>> most software should run locally.
>
> are you speaking about SaaSS?
>
https://www.gnu.org/philosophy/who-does-that-server-really-serve.html
>
> GPL does not forbid SaaSS because it can't.
> GPL allows an SaaSS provider to not give access to sources,
> whereas AGPL doesn't.