In article <
162757405...@zzo38computer.org>,
ne...@zzo38computer.org.invalid says...
> It look like it doesn't include these names.
Well, there you go then.
> Would you be able to tell me then what is the proper glyph names for
PC
> Encoding?
As Rod says, what exactly do you mean by 'PC Encoding' ?
> If they are the glyphs that this font does not include, which
> font does have it,
I have no clue. If you want to use those glyphs then it's up to you to
source a font which includes them.
> and does Ghostscript include it?
You say yourself that the font (not Ghostsceript, Ghostscript is not a
font) does not include these.
> (And if not, should Ghostscript include it?)
Fonts are not required to include every glyph shape known to mankind, so
no there is no reason why the fonts used by Ghostscript should include
them.
You can, of course, use a different font.