thanks
Il giorno giovedì 1 dicembre 2022 alle 09:02:58 UTC+1 ken ha scritto:
> > What puzzle me is that the X11.so is found and opened (verified with strace) but then the x11 device is not reported, I'd like to know what went wrong.
> The person who built the binary either specifically excluded X support
> with a build option, or did not have the required development libraries
> available on their system when they ran autotools, and so the X support
> could not be built in.
ldd X11.so
linux-vdso.so.1 (0x00007ffd4f514000)
libXt.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXt.so.6 (0x00007f93ee7cd000)
libX11.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libX11.so.6 (0x00007f93ee68b000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libc.so.6 (0x00007f93ee4aa000)
libSM.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libSM.so.6 (0x00007f93ee49f000)
libICE.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libICE.so.6 (0x00007f93ee481000)
libxcb.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libxcb.so.1 (0x00007f93ee455000)
libdl.so.2 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2 (0x00007f93ee450000)
/lib64/ld-linux-x86-64.so.2 (0x00007f93ee869000)
libuuid.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libuuid.so.1 (0x00007f93ee447000)
libbsd.so.0 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libbsd.so.0 (0x00007f93ee42d000)
libXau.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXau.so.6 (0x00007f93ee428000)
libXdmcp.so.6 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libXdmcp.so.6 (0x00007f93ee200000)
> > In debian a maintainer is currently missing, and maybe they have more important bugs to look after.
> Well you can always build Ghostscript from source yourself.
Yes I'm going to do that, any advice for building a minimal gs with x11 support?