If I Ruled the Internet . . .
mimus
real- time coverage of RL events.
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
When a system is set up to accomplish some goal, a
new entity has come into being--the system itself.
No matter what the "goal" of the system, it
immediately begins to exhibit system behavior; that
is, to act according to the general laws that govern
the operation of all systems. Now the system itself
has to be dealt with.
< _Systemantics_
-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
Spanky The Thunder Chicken
"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It was a
catchy little ditty that went like this:
> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
> real- time coverage of RL events.
But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents with
formatting intact.
--
Uncle Antny (mhm 11x10)
an...@meow.org
The Orgasm of Meow
Dave Hillstrom
alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, i assfucked mimus
<tinmi...@hotmail.com> so hard they sCreamed:
>I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
>real- time coverage of RL events.
considering every tom, dick, & harry has a pdf writer nowadays, i
agree with you. back when no one knew how to make or edit the
bastards, it served a useful function for reliable technical data.
now its just a bloated .doc file.
streaming i like. just cuz i like streams. pretty trout and beavers
live in streams, you know.
--
dave hillstrom mhm15x4 icq#1598403
"ISLAM: Winning the hearts and minds of the world, one bomb at a time."
- Ubiquitous <web...@polaris.net>
mimus
wrote:
>on Sat, 27 Sep 2003 11:45:35 -0400, in
>alt.alien.vampire.flonk.flonk.flonk, i assfucked mimus
><tinmi...@hotmail.com> so hard they sCreamed:
>
>>I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
>>real- time coverage of RL events.
>
>considering every tom, dick, & harry has a pdf writer nowadays, i
>agree with you. back when no one knew how to make or edit the
>bastards, it served a useful function for reliable technical data.
>now its just a bloated .doc file.
>
>streaming i like. just cuz i like streams. pretty trout and beavers
>live in streams, you know.
I thought they mainly came in .*pegs (and sometimes yEnc).
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Indeed, Children, this is the part of the Tale
where your old Uncle gets to go insane.
< _Mason & Dixon_
mimus
<an...@meow.org> wrote:
>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It was a
>catchy little ditty that went like this:
>
>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
>> real- time coverage of RL events.
>
>But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents with
>formatting intact.
What's wrong with .jpegs?
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Indeed, Children, this is the part of the Tale
where your old Uncle gets to go insane.
< _Mason & Dixon_
Spanky The Thunder Chicken
was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:28:53 GMT, Spanky The Thunder Chicken
><an...@meow.org> wrote:
>
>>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>>"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
>>was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>>
>>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all
>>> but real- time coverage of RL events.
>>
>>But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents with
>>formatting intact.
>
> What's wrong with .jpegs?
Page sized .jpg files are larger than the same PDF info (unless the
PDF is all graphics, which is stupid), plus you can't copy and paste
text from them.
You also can't make multi-page .jpg files.
Poetic Badgers
news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com:
> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
> real- time coverage of RL events.
>
Not on my intranet, you don't.
--
Poetic Badgers
Smeeter #32
"Thank G*d I took off my heels, and put on my... HIMALAYAN WALKING
SHOES!!!" -Elaine Benes, writing copy for JPeterman's
Poetic Badgers
news:tbbcnv82im6m36o4p...@4ax.com:
> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:28:53 GMT, Spanky The Thunder Chicken
> <an...@meow.org> wrote:
>
>>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>>"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It was
>>a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>>
>>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
>>> real- time coverage of RL events.
>>
>>But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents with
>>formatting intact.
>
> What's wrong with .jpegs?
>
POD. 'Nuff said.
johnny 5
bo selcta
mimus
<an...@meow.org> wrote:
>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>"news:tbbcnv82im6m36o4p...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
>was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>
>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:28:53 GMT, Spanky The Thunder Chicken
>><an...@meow.org> wrote:
>>
>>>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>>>"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
>>>was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>>>
>>>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all
>>>> but real- time coverage of RL events.
>>>
>>>But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents with
>>>formatting intact.
>>
>> What's wrong with .jpegs?
>
>Page sized .jpg files are larger than the same PDF info (unless the
>PDF is all graphics, which is stupid), plus you can't copy and paste
>text from them.
>
>You also can't make multi-page .jpg files.
What's wrong with *web- pages*, using CSS, either as a multi- page
file, or multiple pages/ files, all nicely .zipped in either case?
Much more compact. And lots o' features, like linking, whether
internal or even to Internet sites, easy as pie.
--
tinmi...@hotmail.com
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
What the fuck are you TALKING about flunker?
< Billy Big Balls
mimus
wrote:
>mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com:
>
>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
>> real- time coverage of RL events.
>
>Not on my intranet, you don't.
I don't care how shpxed up intranets are.
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
What the fuck are you TALKING about flunker?
< Billy Big Balls
Spanky The Thunder Chicken
"news:oadlovgm9d45mi007...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
> On Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:33:26 GMT, Spanky The Thunder Chicken
><an...@meow.org> wrote:
>
>>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>>"news:tbbcnv82im6m36o4p...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
>>was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>>
>>> On Sat, 27 Sep 2003 18:28:53 GMT, Spanky The Thunder Chicken
>>><an...@meow.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>It seems that on 27 Sep 2003, the number one hit in Croatia was
>>>>"news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com" (by mimus).
>>>>It was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
>>>>
>>>>> I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for
>>>>> all but real- time coverage of RL events.
>>>>
>>>>But PDF files are the only safe method of providing documents
>>>>with formatting intact.
>>>
>>> What's wrong with .jpegs?
>>
>>Page sized .jpg files are larger than the same PDF info (unless
>>the PDF is all graphics, which is stupid), plus you can't copy and
>>paste text from them.
>>
>>You also can't make multi-page .jpg files.
>
> What's wrong with *web- pages*, using CSS, either as a multi- page
> file, or multiple pages/ files, all nicely .zipped in either case?
>
> Much more compact. And lots o' features, like linking, whether
> internal or even to Internet sites, easy as pie.
Because *web- pages* aren't guaranteed to be seen in the same way on
different browsers, and because zip files are a pain in the ass.
AND because you can't print multiple web pages at one time, and
pagination can easily be affected by font size, which is different
for a great many systems.
AND because most people can't write a web page for crap.
AND because PDFs are also capable of both internal and external links
(though that's a lot more difficult).
u smell
> mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com:
>
> > I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
> > real- time coverage of RL events.
> >
> Not on my intranet, you don't.
the internet is good
greg
> news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com:
>
> > I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for all but
> > real- time coverage of RL events.
> >
> Not on my intranet, you don't.
Internet rulz man
Louise McQuade
> the net is the best thing since sliced bread
>
> bo selcta
My name is Louise Mcquade and I go Langside College. Could tell me
if you chat is more entertainment and has more dangers than it's main
purpose, to allow people to communicate instantly from all over the
world. Also what chat software do think is the best?
mimus
lorraine docherty
i would ban the internet altoghether , then i would not have so much
trouble on completeing my course work, which is all to do with the
internet and ftp, url,broswers...ect
mimus
docherty) wrote:
I'm almost certain that less than 50% of Internet users need ECT.
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Prang-nuts is prang-nuts, right? Whether you find
'em inna woods, or they're dispensed by a autofeeder.
< Laumer
Spanky The Thunder Chicken
"news:9d2iqv82p2ubf4ouq...@4ax.com" (by mimus). It
was a catchy little ditty that went like this:
> On 5 Nov 2003 04:32:53 -0800, lorraine...@hotmail.com
> (lorraine docherty) wrote:
>
>>whar...@hotmail.com (greg) wrote in message
>>news:<5f37684c.03102...@posting.google.com>...
>>
>>> Poetic Badgers <poeticbadgers@spammenot> wrote in message
>>> news:<Xns940452B2864...@207.14.113.17>...
>>
>>> > mimus <tinmi...@hotmail.com> wrote in
>>> > news:d1cbnvg675oj1p8bs...@4ax.com:
>>> >
>>> > > I'd ban .pdf files for terminal bloating, and streaming for
>>> > > all but real- time coverage of RL events.
>>> >
>>> > Not on my intranet, you don't.
>>>
>>> Internet rulz man
>>
>>i would ban the internet altoghether , then i would not have so
>>much trouble on completeing my course work, which is all to do
>>with the internet and ftp, url,broswers...ect
>
> I'm almost certain that less than 50% of Internet users need ECT.
ECT usage among Internet users has dropped 80% over the past 6 years.
It suffered a major setback when AOL stopped supporting it in 2001.
Louise McQuade
> On 30 Oct 2003 08:34:07 -0800, louisemc...@fsmail.net (Louise
> McQuade) wrote:
>
> >bigyaw...@hotmail.com (johnny 5) wrote in message news:<82fe4945.03101...@posting.google.com>...
> >
> >> the net is the best thing since sliced bread
> >>
> >> bo selcta
> >
> >Hi,
> >
> >My name is Louise Mcquade and I go Langside College. Could tell me
> >if you chat is more entertainment and has more dangers than it's main
> >purpose, to allow people to communicate instantly from all over the
> >world. Also what chat software do think is the best
Hi It's Louise from Langside College again. why can't chat be educational?
Yours Louise Mcquade
Roddy
Chat can be a good thing but it can also devolve into petty sniping.
GC
I think it is ok to use chatrooms for a little break away from work
but some people tend to use them 24 - 7 and i think that is sad
Gillian
mimus
It beats having *completely* imaginary friends.
smeeter 11 or maybe 12
mp 10
mhm 29x13
Mark Twain, whenever sober long enough to permit an
estimate, has been uniformly found to bear a spotless
character.
< Ambrose Bierce