info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
[CM] Why use WWW instead of a naked domain?
5 views
Skip to first unread message
RS Wood
Jan 31, 2016, 11:39:47 AM1/31/16
to
From the «because naked is ... um ... sexy» department:
Title: Why use www?
Author:
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:49:19 -0500
Link: http://www.yes-www.org/why-use-www/
Comments[1]
Links:
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11004396 (link)
--
Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
Title: Why use www?
Author:
Date: Sat, 30 Jan 2016 18:49:19 -0500
Link: http://www.yes-www.org/why-use-www/
Comments[1]
Links:
[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11004396 (link)
--
Posting to comp.misc, sci.misc, and misc.news.internet.discuss
Helmut Richter
Jan 31, 2016, 12:14:45 PM1/31/16
to
Am 31.01.2016 um 17:39 schrieb RS Wood:
> http://www.yes-www.org/why-use-www/
Is an URL xxx.yyy.tld naked or not if xxx ≠ www ?
I guess not, and for Webservers having a name below the second level
domain, the whole argument does not hold water. Or does it?
I do second that each page should have a canonical URL and all other
URLs should be redirected there with a 301.
--
Helmut Richter
> http://www.yes-www.org/why-use-www/
Is an URL xxx.yyy.tld naked or not if xxx ≠ www ?
I guess not, and for Webservers having a name below the second level
domain, the whole argument does not hold water. Or does it?
I do second that each page should have a canonical URL and all other
URLs should be redirected there with a 301.
--
Helmut Richter
0 new messages