info
Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Good HTML5 CSS3 reference books
4 views
Skip to first unread message
The Doctor
Oct 27, 2013, 9:02:48 PM10/27/13
to
What book or books would you recommend for HTML5/CSS3 ?
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
23 Nov 2013 a Big day indeed
--
Member - Liberal International This is doc...@nl2k.ab.ca Ici doc...@nl2k.ab.ca
God,Queen and country!Never Satan President Republic!Beware AntiChrist rising!
http://www.fullyfollow.me/rootnl2k Look at Psalms 14 and 53 on Atheism
23 Nov 2013 a Big day indeed
tlvp
Oct 27, 2013, 9:13:57 PM10/27/13
to
On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 01:02:48 +0000 (UTC), The Doctor wrote:
> What book or books would you recommend for HTML5/CSS3 ?
I can tell you the ISBNs, title, & author of the only 21st Century CSS book
> What book or books would you recommend for HTML5/CSS3 ?
I own, provided you don't construe this communication as a recommendation:
ISBN-10: 1-59059-614-5
ISBN-13: 978-1-59059-614-2
Andy Budd
CSS Mastery
HTH. Cheers, -- tlvp
--
Avant de repondre, jeter la poubelle, SVP.
dorayme
Oct 27, 2013, 10:04:43 PM10/27/13
to
In article <71zirvod0zu9$.1ipk1t07...@40tude.net>,
--
dorayme
tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
> I can tell you the ISBNs, title, & author of the only 21st Century CSS book
> I own, provided you don't construe this communication as a recommendation:
Why would you do this if there no element of recommendation in it?
> I can tell you the ISBNs, title, & author of the only 21st Century CSS book
> I own, provided you don't construe this communication as a recommendation:
--
dorayme
Gus Richter
Oct 28, 2013, 2:43:34 PM10/28/13
to
On 10/27/2013 9:02 PM, The Doctor wrote:
> What book or books would you recommend for HTML5/CSS3 ?
>
For HTML5 peruse <http://diveinto.html5doctor.com/>
> What book or books would you recommend for HTML5/CSS3 ?
>
and you can get it in print as well if you desire.
For other specific items such as CSS3, peruse:
<http://caniuse.com/>
-- Gus
* peruse = read thoroughly with great care *
---
This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
http://www.avast.com
tlvp
Oct 29, 2013, 2:23:56 AM10/29/13
to
dorayme
Oct 29, 2013, 5:15:44 AM10/29/13
to
In article <1rx08o1g2yi0y.io9afsgpjlzw$.d...@40tude.net>,
be a reason to suggest a thing. Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
--
dorayme
tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:43 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article <71zirvod0zu9$.1ipk1t07...@40tude.net>,
> > tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I can tell you the ISBNs, title, & author of the only 21st Century CSS book
> >> I own, provided you don't construe this communication as a recommendation:
> >
> > Why would you do this if there no element of recommendation in it?
>
> When I cannot recommend, I sometimes suggest. This was such a time.
Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, there would hardly
> On Mon, 28 Oct 2013 13:04:43 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> > In article <71zirvod0zu9$.1ipk1t07...@40tude.net>,
> > tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
> >
> >> I can tell you the ISBNs, title, & author of the only 21st Century CSS book
> >> I own, provided you don't construe this communication as a recommendation:
> >
> > Why would you do this if there no element of recommendation in it?
>
> When I cannot recommend, I sometimes suggest. This was such a time.
be a reason to suggest a thing. Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
--
dorayme
tlvp
Oct 30, 2013, 3:45:10 AM10/30/13
to
On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:15:44 +1100, dorayme wrote:
> Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
> ... there would hardly
I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
> Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
> blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
More reasons than I can shake a stick at. And it doesn't smack of my style.
Why should I chance "he" reach a Joy of Cooking, or a Ramayana, or a Leaves
of Grass, if "he" wants CSS & HTML5? Would you? Cheers etc., -- tlvp
> Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
> ... there would hardly
> be a reason to suggest a thing.
Exactly. Try the contrapositive of what you just wrote, for better insight:
I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
> Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
> blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
Why should I chance "he" reach a Joy of Cooking, or a Ramayana, or a Leaves
of Grass, if "he" wants CSS & HTML5? Would you? Cheers etc., -- tlvp
dorayme
Oct 30, 2013, 5:28:17 PM10/30/13
to
In article <vjvnm7fn2xyj.14...@40tude.net>,
mean (in my idiolect) by counterfactual. Yes, it turns out to be
against the facts, you admit there was some element of recommendation.
> > ... there would hardly
> > be a reason to suggest a thing.
>
> Exactly. Try the contrapositive of what you just wrote, for better insight:
> I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
> there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
>
OK, you are now making a distinction between using "recommend" to mean
"fully recommend" and "recommend to some extent". Seems odd to me how
you so muscularly dissociated yourself from recommending.
> But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
>
> > Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
> > blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
>
> More reasons than I can shake a stick at.
<g>
--
dorayme
tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:15:44 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> > Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
>
> Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
>
I am supposing you mean (in your idiolect) by contrafactual what I
> On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:15:44 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>
> > Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
>
> Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
>
mean (in my idiolect) by counterfactual. Yes, it turns out to be
against the facts, you admit there was some element of recommendation.
> > ... there would hardly
> > be a reason to suggest a thing.
>
> Exactly. Try the contrapositive of what you just wrote, for better insight:
> I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
> there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
>
"fully recommend" and "recommend to some extent". Seems odd to me how
you so muscularly dissociated yourself from recommending.
> But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
>
> > Why not suggest he goes to a bookshop,
> > blindfolds himself, and reach for any book at all? <g>
>
> More reasons than I can shake a stick at.
--
dorayme
tlvp
Oct 31, 2013, 4:50:14 AM10/31/13
to
On Thu, 31 Oct 2013 08:28:17 +1100, dorayme wrote:
> Seems odd to me how
> you so muscularly dissociated yourself from recommending.
As someone who barely weighs 55 kg, even when sopping wet, I can't do much
> Seems odd to me how
> you so muscularly dissociated yourself from recommending.
of anything particularly muscularly. Not even dissociate myself :-) . But I
suppose it's too much for me to expect you to be aware of that -- after
all, you hardly know me. But no matter, so long as all is well now, and
clear, and calm again. Cheers, and Hallowe'en greetings, -- tlvp
Adam H. Kerman
Nov 2, 2013, 11:55:56 PM11/2/13
to
tlvp <mPiOsUcB...@att.net> wrote:
>On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:15:44 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>>Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
>Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
>> ... there would hardly
>> be a reason to suggest a thing.
>Exactly. Try the contrapositive of what you just wrote, for better insight:
>I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
>there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
>But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
Is there a book you would refuse to recommend upon pain of death?
>On Tue, 29 Oct 2013 20:15:44 +1100, dorayme wrote:
>>Surely, if there was no element of recommendation, ...
>Well, now, there's a contrafactual hypothesis, if ever I saw one :-) .
>> ... there would hardly
>> be a reason to suggest a thing.
>Exactly. Try the contrapositive of what you just wrote, for better insight:
>I suggested the thing, presumably for some (perhaps hidden) reason, whence
>there surely was *some* element (howsoever small) of recommendation.
>But I didn't want the suggestion to be taken as an all-out recommendation.
Molly Mockford
Nov 3, 2013, 11:40:56 AM11/3/13
to
At 03:55:56 on Sun, 3 Nov 2013, Adam H. Kerman <a...@chinet.com> wrote in
<l54hgc$ic0$1...@news.albasani.net>:
Anything by Jeffrey Archer.
--
Molly Mockford
Nature loves variety. Unfortunately, society hates it. (Milton Diamond Ph.D.)
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
<l54hgc$ic0$1...@news.albasani.net>:
--
Molly Mockford
Nature loves variety. Unfortunately, society hates it. (Milton Diamond Ph.D.)
(My Reply-To address *is* valid, though may not remain so for ever.)
tlvp
Nov 3, 2013, 10:01:53 PM11/3/13
to
On Sun, 3 Nov 2013 03:55:56 +0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:
> Is there a book you would refuse to recommend upon pain of death?
Spare me the paradoxical hypotheticals, please. Thanks. Cheers, -- tlvp
> Is there a book you would refuse to recommend upon pain of death?
0 new messages