! Web Site Design
Earthlink
Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
We will create a custom, affordable Web Site for your small business or
personal needs. We even do custom graphics for your new Web Site.
Also, we will Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
spend it elsewhere. And this, even without needing a new Web Site!
Alan J. Flavell
> Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
The regular readers of c.i.w.a.h cordially invite you
to jump in the river. Dress optional.
Ed Valle
<Pine.HPP.3.95a.99042...@hpplus03.cern.ch>...
Hi Alan,
Create your own private little club so that only you and those "hungry
wolves" in your pack can post all the wonderful off-topic messages you
engage in whenever you feel like it.
Ed.
William G. Schlake
<fla...@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
>On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Earthlink wrote:
>
>> Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
>
>The regular readers of c.i.w.a.h cordially invite you
>to jump in the river. Dress optional.
Why...are you lonely? You've been all wet as long as I can remember.
>
Abigail
<URL:news:7fl44d$2u4$1...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>:
++
++ Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
Well, I didn't.
++ We will create a custom, affordable Web Site for your small business or
++ personal needs. We even do custom graphics for your new Web Site.
Goodie. I'd like to have one in HTML 4.0 strict. But hold the mayo.
++ Also, we will Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
++ spend it elsewhere. And this, even without needing a new Web Site!
Research the Internet? Good, one question that has always kept me
wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
Abigail
--
Anyone who slaps a "this page is best viewed with Browser X" label
on a Web page appears to be yearning for the bad old days, before the
Web, when you had very little chance of reading a document written on
another computer, another word processor, or another network.
[Tim Berners-Lee in Technology Review, July 1996]
Abigail
in <URL:news:Pine.HPP.3.95a.99042...@hpplus03.cern.ch>:
++ On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Earthlink wrote:
++
++ > Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
++ The regular readers of c.i.w.a.h cordially invite you
++ to jump in the river. Dress optional.
I'd like to invite him as well, but we've laws against water pollution.
catnip
>Earthlink (chris...@earthlink.net) wrote on MMLIX September MCMXCIII in
><URL:news:7fl44d$2u4$1...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>:
>++ Also, we will Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
>++ spend it elsewhere. And this, even without needing a new Web Site!
>
>
>Research the Internet? Good, one question that has always kept me
>wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
I'd like to know excatly how many pages there are on the WWW by
Friday. Do you think they could answer that one for me? I just don't
have the TIME and I need to spend it elsewhere.
catnip
William G. Schlake
wrote:
You need to spend some time on a sofa in a darkened room telling the
nice doctor about your problems...like your hair twirling and bitchy
personality.
Jedi Master Yoda
>
>Research the Internet? Good, one question that has always kept me
>wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
I think mauve has the most RAM.
JMY
Earthlink
We create custom, affordable Web Sites for your small business. We even do
all of your Custom Graphics, use graphics you provide-pictures, gif's,
etc.-and can alter them to fit your needs. Java, JavaScript, HTML, CGI-you
name it!
Also, we'll Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
SPEND it somewhere else.
Miguel Cruz
> Also, we'll Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
> SPEND it somewhere else.
Great, GLAD to hear IT. Would you PLEASE research the internet's PREVAILING
attitudes towards newsgroup SPAM and get back TO me with your FINDINGS?
Thank YOU.
miguel
catnip
*jots that down*
You just never know what you'll learn in this newsgroup...
catnip
REBUS
William G. Schlake wrote in message <3726972a...@news.enteract.com>...
>On Thu, 22 Apr 1999 02:23:36 GMT, cat...@geocities.com (catnip)
>wrote:
>
>>On 22 Apr 1999 02:43:26 GMT, abi...@fnx.com (Abigail) wrote:
>>
>>>Earthlink (chris...@earthlink.net) wrote on MMLIX September MCMXCIII in
>>><URL:news:7fl44d$2u4$1...@holly.prod.itd.earthlink.net>:
>>
>>>++ Also, we will Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME,
and
>>>++ spend it elsewhere. And this, even without needing a new Web Site!
>>>
>>>
>>>Research the Internet? Good, one question that has always kept me
>>>wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
>>
REBUS
Ed Valle wrote in message <7flbjc$l1d$0...@207.212.27.48>...
>Alan J. Flavell <fla...@mail.cern.ch> wrote in article
><Pine.HPP.3.95a.99042...@hpplus03.cern.ch>...
>> On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Earthlink wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>Create your own private little club so that only you and those "hungry
>wolves" in your pack can post all the wonderful off-topic messages you
>engage in whenever you feel like it.
What! He did (just ask your boss). It's called CIWAH, and your posting in
it.
>
>Ed.
>
REBUS
William G. Schlake wrote in message <37333383...@news.enteract.com>...
>On Wed, 21 Apr 1999 21:00:22 +0200, "Alan J. Flavell"
><fla...@mail.cern.ch> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Earthlink wrote:
>>
>>> Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
>>
>>The regular readers of c.i.w.a.h cordially invite you
>>to jump in the river. Dress optional.
>
Jeremy Clulow
Why is so much time being wasted even replying to these spammers?
If they weren't so arrogant and had merely asked for their site
to be evaluated (although this isn't really the right NG for
that) they might have learn't something. As it it, they have
learned nothing to improve their very mediocre work and have
wasted many peoples time. There you see, I've just wasted my time
as well.....
Jeremy Clulow
Webs Wonder Design
jer...@webswonder.co.uk
http://www.webswonder.co.uk/
Jedi Master Yoda
>>Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
>
>Why is so much time being wasted even replying to these spammers?
>If they weren't so arrogant and had merely asked for their site
>to be evaluated (although this isn't really the right NG for
>that) they might have learn't something. As it it, they have
>learned nothing to improve their very mediocre work and have
>wasted many peoples time. There you see, I've just wasted my time
>as well.....
Insidious, isn't it?
JMY
Mark Evans
> On Wed, 21 Apr 1999, Earthlink wrote:
>> Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
> The regular readers of c.i.w.a.h cordially invite you
> to jump in the river. Dress optional.
Concrete boots prefered...
Ed Valle
<92481107...@news.remarQ.com>...
>
...
>
> What! He did (just ask your boss). It's called CIWAH, and your posting in
> it.
>
Hi REBUS,
I did ask my boss and he looked at me funny. I don't think he knows what
you are talking about or even what CIWAH means.
As far as that troll named Alan, he can infest this ng with his stupidity
because he knows that morons like you will come rushing to save his exposed
cute little butt. You were here when he brought a plague of off-topic posts
upon CIWAH with one single post. "Black September" according to JMY. The
slight resemblence in this thread is purely intentional and we owe it to
Alan once again.
It seems you are behaving in alt.html and that is appreciated. It is kind
of interesting that when Art S. chided you for including all 80+ lines with
your moronic one-liner you responded by saying that "you were not thinking
just then". That explanation certainly sheds some light on the stupidity
and insolent personal attacks in which you have engaged for the past year
or so. I know, you have a reputation as a "troll-slayer" to defend, but for
all practical purposes, you, catnip, miguel and many of the others have
been neutralized as HTML posters.
I hope you sleep well, don't let those pink elephants fly over your head
and drop some of the same stuff you so blatantly drop on this ng.
Say Hi to Alan for me.
Ed.
catnip
> I know, you have a reputation as a "troll-slayer" to defend, but for
>all practical purposes, you, catnip, miguel and many of the others have
>been neutralized as HTML posters.
Whoa. For a minute there, I thought that said "neutered". Ouch.
catnip
REBUS
Ed Valle wrote in message <7frhh9$j6o$0...@207.212.27.88>...
>REBUS <rebus@acces(1).com> wrote in article
><92481107...@news.remarQ.com>...
>>
>...
>>
>> What! He did (just ask your boss). It's called CIWAH, and your posting in
>> it.
>>
>
>Hi REBUS,
>
>I did ask my boss and he looked at me funny. I don't think he knows what
>you are talking about or even what CIWAH means.
Good one....
>
>As far as that troll named Alan, he can infest this ng with his stupidity
>because he knows that morons like you will come rushing to save his exposed
>cute little butt.
Personally, I could care less what percieved sling his ass is in. I am,
however, deeply offended by the likes of WGS (and apparently you at times)
to insist that he is somehow "enforcing" his beliefs about HTML on "hapless
newbies."
Again, personally, I don't buy all of Alan's comments about HTML, but as
someone who is responsible for not just creating sites, but advising and
managing a large group of people who do, his cautions are foolish to
completely ignore.
>You were here when he brought a plague of off-topic posts
>upon CIWAH with one single post. "Black September" according to JMY. The
>slight resemblence in this thread is purely intentional and we owe it to
>Alan once again.
Nope. You've been ready that revisionist historian again. Although, I do
agree that it takes two to tango.
>
>It seems you are behaving in alt.html and that is appreciated. It is kind
>of interesting that when Art S. chided you for including all 80+ lines with
>your moronic one-liner you responded by saying that "you were not thinking
>just then". That explanation certainly sheds some light on the stupidity
>and insolent personal attacks in which you have engaged for the past year
>or so.
Well actually, I was thinking that shows I know the difference between
truely clueless and occasional laspes.
>I know, you have a reputation as a "troll-slayer" to defend,
I have no reputation to defend what-so-ever....(Hint: that's why there's a
pseudonym)
>but for
>all practical purposes, you, catnip, miguel and many of the others have
>been neutralized as HTML posters.
Oh, I guess so...I mean especially if you say so.
>
>I hope you sleep well, don't let those pink elephants fly over your head
>and drop some of the same stuff you so blatantly drop on this ng.
I sleep well, they are blue, and the stuff you're stepping in comes from WGS
not elephants.
REBUS
response by Alan (or any other alleged "purist") in CIWAH, but not by the
"regulars" or ALT.HTML?
William G. Schlake
wrote:
>Again, personally, I don't buy all of Alan's comments about HTML, but as
>someone who is responsible for not just creating sites, but advising and
>managing a large group of people who do, his cautions are foolish to
>completely ignore.
Calling Flavell's anti-Microsoft rantings responsible is like saying
Jerry Springer's guests should be held up as models of civility.
>>I know, you have a reputation as a "troll-slayer" to defend,
>I have no reputation to defend what-so-ever....(Hint: that's why there's a
>pseudonym)
So you admit you're just a gutless coward that likes to take pot shots
then crawls back under some rock leaving a trail of slime. At least
Flavell has the balls to use his real name. At least I can respect him
for that. In fact most every person that could be called a "regular"
uses his real name in CIWAH. Except you. Rather revealing isn't it.
Jacqui Caren Jacqui Caren
Jedi Master Yoda <yo...@dagoba.org> wrote:
>On 22 Apr 1999 02:43:26 GMT, Abigail <abi...@fnx.com> saw fit to expound:
>>
>>wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
Cherekov radiation
>I think mauve has the most RAM.
I know of a WDH named "light blue deep pink".
Does this help?
Jacqui
--
Email: Jacqui...@ig.co.uk http://www.ig.co.uk/
Fax : +44 1483 419 419 Paul Ingram Group Ltd,140A High
Phone: +44 1483 424 424 Street,Godalming GU7 1AB United Kingdom
Sell digital goods hassle free? http://www.smartaxis.com/
Jacqui Caren Jacqui Caren
Jeremy Clulow <jer...@webswonder.co.uk> wrote:
>>Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
>
>If they weren't so arrogant and had merely asked for their site
>to be evaluated (although this isn't really the right NG for
>that) they might have learn't something. As it it, they have
>learned nothing to improve their very mediocre work and have
>wasted many peoples time. There you see, I've just wasted my time
>as well.....
Not at all - when someone does a dejanews personal profile on
these clueless wannabees they will see what other think of
thier (limited) abilities.
Jacqui Caren Jacqui Caren
Earthlink <chris...@earthlink.net> wrote:
>Thank you for choosing Christoria Design-The Power of Design.
>
>all of your Custom Graphics, use graphics you provide-pictures, gif's,
>etc.-and can alter them to fit your needs. Java, JavaScript, HTML, CGI-you
>name it!
>
>Also, we'll Research the Internet for you so you can save your TIME, and
>SPEND it somewhere else.
>
>http://www.christoriadesign.com
>webm...@christoriadesign.com
FYI: this spammer seems to be hosted at valueweb.net so
I am sending a cc to their postmaster...
Hopefully valueweb.net has some form of AUP and hosting
a repeat usenet (non-adverts NG) spammer who fails to
respond to polite (posted and emailed) requests to stop
is reason enough to terminate thier account?
Jacqui
> set type=SOA
> christoriadesign.com.
Server: cache-1.ns.demon.net
Address: 158.152.1.58
christoriadesign.com
origin = ns.valueweb.net
mail addr = dnsadm.valueweb.net
serial = 922995039
refresh = 3600 (1 hour)
retry = 900 (15 mins)
expire = 604800 (7 days)
minimum ttl = 86400 (1 day)
christoriadesign.com nameserver = ns.valueweb.net
christoriadesign.com nameserver = ns2.valueweb.net
ns.valueweb.net internet address = 199.227.124.192
ns2.valueweb.net internet address = 199.227.124.200
William G. Schlake
(Jacqui Caren) wrote:
>Not at all - when someone does a dejanews personal profile on
>these clueless wannabees they will see what other think of
>thier (limited) abilities.
Right like for example check Flavell's LOL!
Iain Hallam
>>>wondering, why does the Internet has the colour it has?
>
>Cherekov radiation
So exactly which part of the 'net is attemting to go faster than light? :-)
- Iain.
REBUS
William G. Schlake wrote in message <3730762f...@news.enteract.com>...
>On Wed, 28 Apr 1999 13:04:10 -0700, "REBUS" <rebus@acces(1).com>
>wrote:
>
>>Again, personally, I don't buy all of Alan's comments about HTML, but as
>>someone who is responsible for not just creating sites, but advising and
>>managing a large group of people who do, his cautions are foolish to
>>completely ignore.
>
>Calling Flavell's anti-Microsoft rantings responsible is like saying
>Jerry Springer's guests should be held up as models of civility.
There are elements of truth in MS-bashing. Like all jihads (such as yours),
however, one cannot seriously take the "movement" as a whole.
>
>>>I know, you have a reputation as a "troll-slayer" to defend,
>>I have no reputation to defend what-so-ever....(Hint: that's why there's a
>>pseudonym)
>
>So you admit you're just a gutless coward that likes to take pot shots
>then crawls back under some rock leaving a trail of slime. At least
>Flavell has the balls to use his real name. At least I can respect him
>for that. In fact most every person that could be called a "regular"
>uses his real name in CIWAH. Except you. Rather revealing isn't it.
I could care less about your definitions of "regular", and yes, to the
half-intelligent, I presume it is revealing.
William G. Schlake
wrote:
>>Calling Flavell's anti-Microsoft rantings responsible is like saying
>>Jerry Springer's guests should be held up as models of civility.
>
>There are elements of truth in MS-bashing. Like all jihads (such as yours),
>however, one cannot seriously take the "movement" as a whole.
That's funny! The only ones trying to wage a "holy war" are purists.
>...uses his real name in CIWAH. Except you. Rather revealing isn't it.
>
>I could care less about your definitions of "regular", and yes, to the
>half-intelligent, I presume it is revealing.
>
And you need to try to hide your idenity because?
Ed Valle
> On a more serious note: why are you and yours so critical of this type of
> response by Alan (or any other alleged "purist") in CIWAH, but not by the
> "regulars" or ALT.HTML?
>
Hi REBUS,
You are really something. I could barely stop laughing at your stupidity in
your previous reply to me. But I decided to answer because is not always
that you step out of character to ask an honest question.
I looked back at those who responded to earthlink and (AFAIKS) only Johnnie
ego can be considered a regular in alt.html. So I have news for you. I have
chided him with sarcasm in the past, something of the "Oh My God, Horror of
Horrors!" type of response over another blatant spam, which Johnnie hates
with a passion.
As for that other regular, Mr. Schlake, I have also news for you. I have
publicly disagreed with him in the past and have called him names as well.
He stubbornly continues to treat me with respect in spite of these facts.
Let me give you an example of his response to one of my disagreements with
him, he said: "Jude is not a she". OK, so I missed Jude's gender by a mile
and two quarters, do you see any hint of ridicule in his response? any
sarcasm for not checking my facts before I say something? well, neither do
I.
So it all boils down to basic respect for each other. I treat Bill with
respect, he reciprocates with respect. Such a novel idea huh REBUS,
completely foreign to you and many of the regulars you so hotly defend.
Cheers bud,
Ed.