robobox <
robobox...@gmail.com> writes:
> On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 at 12:34:10 PM UTC, ldpshddtti wrote:
>> This "resurgence" happens from time to time with Gopher and
>> Gemini. People get sick of the bloated web and find ways to cleanse
>> their palate of all the fat and corn syrup that the web gave them.
>> They'll create their own {gopherhole, capsule} in sdf, write a "Why
>> {Gopher, Gemini} is Great" and hang out with some of the small web
>> denizens.
>
> I think that's part of it, but the web could be lightweight on its
> own, IMO. I think a large part of it is that Gopher competed with the
> web back in the early 90s, so people are curious as to what it was
> like, and that it works well on older platforms. (That's probably why
> Gemini hasn't made a splash; it doesn't offer much new over gopher and
> takes away one of its advantages)
>
Maybe. Though I think one reason why some people flock to Gopher is
because it forces you to be lightweight. Yes, it's possible to create a
lightweight website in HTTP, but it's very easy to bloat your website
with fancy graphics and javascript. Even the most "basic" website today
in the web uses Google Analytics which is really sad.
So yeah, maybe people are going back to Gopher for the nostalgia and the
curiousity of a technology that time forgot. But I'm leaning heavily on
the side that it's just simpler, lighter and easier to publish for than
the modern web.
I think Gemini definitely made a splash on certain technology circles. I
mean, when I used to frequent "Hacker" "News" around 2019-2020 there is
atleast 1 to 2 articles about Gemini every week. Of course, being
"Hacker" "News" it's immediately dismissed as: "Well, the web can do
this so why bother?"
I think, in general terms, Gemini is a good grassroots project that
wants to do something different. It has a lot activity right now because
it's new but I hope solderpunk cements the reference for it soon. I'm
afraid that the fervor and excitement around it might turn it to a weird
"web-lite" protocol with all the cruft and extensions that the web has.
This might OT now, but I've already seen this with amfora including
favicon support which is something that I think is not included in the
reference for Gemini. It kind of sparked a debate as well, but it is
what it is.
>> Though I still believe that slowly but surely the small web has been
>> steadily growing. I find that everytime there's a "resurgence" there
>> are more and more people who stay even when that "resurgence" ends.
>
> I think the resurgence has a lot more to do with people wanting Web
> 1.0 back than anything to do with Gopher. It's just that social media
> has become so big any effort to bring the old experience back gets
> crushed in search results by it. Because Gopher is a different
> protocol, it doesn't have to compete with the social media giants.
>
> - robobox
I agree. Finding "Web 1.0" websites are hard as hell and if you don't
know where to look, you'll never find what you're looking for. I am
glad that I knew about
wiby.me but I think Gopher does a decent job of
curating content that used to be on "Web 1.0" websites.
--
Pointless meanderings in a bleak and lonely world.