Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

my attempt to enable/disable motion sensors

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Maas

unread,
Sep 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/28/99
to
A challenge for some of you... (long)

I have a couple of fluorescent lights in my basement that I'd like
to control by motion sensor (lights on and off), but also be able
to disable the motion sensors by a switch and have a manual override
(lights on and off by switch).

I put appliance modules inline in the wiring to the lights and am
currently using Homeseer, some logic, and a dummy X10 address to
keep track of the motion sensor enable/disable status. What I don't
like about the current setup is that there's a couple-second delay
between the motion sensor detecting motion and Homeseer deciding
if it should turn on the light when I have the sensors enabled.

So, what I tried was this (A1, A2, and A3 represent appliance modules
wired inline with different X10 addresses):

+---A1--------+
120VAC------| |------light
+---A2---A3---+

The A1 is to be able to turn on the switch regardless of the motion
sensor. The A2 is the motion sensor override, and the A3 is the
switch controlled directly by the motion sensor (motion sensor also
set to code A3). So, the operation would be as follows (from a
palm pad or whatever):

A1 : user controlled, will turn light on regardless of motion sensor,
will turn light off if motion sensor is disabled
A2 : user controlled, will enable/disable motion sensor from
controlling light
A3 : motion sensor controlled, will turn on/off only if A2 is on.

The normal mode would be: (A1 off, A2 on) so that the motion sensor
(A3) handles the lights, but in some cases I want to override the motion
sensor (thus the A1 and A2 switches).

When I tried this, I would get some relay latching that I didn't want.
For example, if A2 was on and the motion sensor turned on A3, A1
would latch on (power on both sides of the relay apparently closed it).
The same would happen if A2 was on and I turned on A1. A3 would latch
and would not allow me to turn off A2. It simply didn't work.

Like I said, I've got one switch in place and Homeseer works to handle
it all with logic and dummy X10 addresses, but I'd like the instantaneous
action of actual switches in this case.

Any ideas on how to do the above without the inadvertent latching?
Any kind of "AC diode"?


Thanks,
Ryan

--
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
:: Ryan Maas Apex, NC :: "Working is for chumps." ::
:: maas @ pagesz . net :: -- Jill Johnson ::
:::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

Ido Bar-Tana

unread,
Sep 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/28/99
to
I think what you need is local current sensing disable:
1. disassemble the module.
2. locate the diode near the output prongs, right near the small blue
capacitor.
3. snip the diode top lead.


Maas <ma...@nina.pagesz.net> wrote in message
news:slrn7v1l1...@nina.pagesz.net...

Stephen W. Jones

unread,
Sep 28, 1999, 3:00:00 AM9/28/99
to
You can find the mod w/pictures at:
http://www3.edgenet.net/lingling/x10-mod3.html

--
Return address hacked to prevent SPAM.
To reply remove X, NoSpam, & Not
Support anti-Spam legislation.
Join the fight http://www.cauce.org/

hey...@my-deja.com

unread,
Oct 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/1/99
to
Um, for the less hardware challenged population,
overriding a motion detector, or making it do
other things, is one of those features of the CPU-
XA that is fairly easy to program. Yeah, yeah, I
know, why would you spend $150+ to override a $10
detector. I'm just mentioning this because I
found it very annoying that X10 doesn't provide
any solution to this, but very happy to find it
as a side benefit of this other product.


Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Maas

unread,
Oct 1, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/1/99
to
hey...@my-deja.com wrote:
>Um, for the less hardware challenged population,
>overriding a motion detector, or making it do
>other things, is one of those features of the CPU-
>XA that is fairly easy to program. Yeah, yeah, I
>know, why would you spend $150+ to override a $10
>detector. I'm just mentioning this because I
>found it very annoying that X10 doesn't provide
>any solution to this, but very happy to find it
>as a side benefit of this other product.

That would be another programming solution, right? I have
a programming solution, but it introduces a couple second
delay when the motion sensors are enabled. The appeal of
the mechanical solution is that it's more instantaneous.

Maas

unread,
Oct 2, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/2/99
to
Ok, I disabled the current sensing in all three appliance modules
in my setup described below by clipping the prescribed diode.

I verified individually that each modified module still works and
no longer has the ability to sense a current demand. Still, when
put together in the setup described, I get the same results -
switches latching when there's current on each side of it and not
wanting to unlatch.

Back to my programming solution with a delay, unless anyone has
another suggestion.


Ryan

--

Daystar

unread,
Oct 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/4/99
to
I bet you could make your sensor computer controlled if you put it's power
source (now the batteries) on a transformer (3v) and used an appliance
module to turn it on and off.

George

Maas <ma...@nina.pagesz.net> wrote in message

news:slrn7vd35...@nina.pagesz.net...

Dave

unread,
Oct 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM10/4/99
to
That will only work if you want the sensor to be code A1 as it gets reset to
this when power is removed.
0 new messages