Pentium Pro vs. Pentium II
Joseph Maas
Anthony D. Coppedge wrote:
>
> Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
> 233 ??
>
> Just curious to see the differences....
>
> -Anthony
> acop...@mindspring.com
Just get a 604e/180 Mac running OS-8 and it blows 'em both away.
Joseph Maas,
paragon3
Anthony D. Coppedge
Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
233 ??
Just curious to see the differences....
-Anthony
acop...@mindspring.com
"The answers to the top five questions you've always wanted to ask me
are: Yes, No, Maybe, Sometimes and I Don't Know"
littleb...@!juno.com
go PRO; 25% faster....i think 25%. don't really matter cuz the pros
are faster (just not sure by how much, gimmie a day and i'll look it up
if ya want the specs).
--
"Son, no matter how far you travel, or how smart you get, always
remember this: Some day, somewhere, a guy is going to come to you and
show you a nice brand-new deck of cards on which the seel has never been
broken, and this guy is going to offer to bet you that the jack of
spades will jump out of this deck and squirt cider in your ear. But son,
do not bet him, for as sure as you do, you are going to get an ear full
of cider."
- Mr. Damon Runyon
"A good artist copies, a great artist steals."
- Picasso
"Computers are incredibly fast, accurate and stupid. Humans beings are
incredibly slow, inaccurate and brilliant. Together they are powerful
beyond imagination."
- Albert Einstein
NOTICE TO BULK EMAILER(S): Pursuant to US Code,
Title 47, Chapter 5, Subchapter II, 227, any and all unsolicited
commercial e-mail sent to this address is subject to a download and
archival fee in the amount of $500 US.
Chris Blanos
>Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
>233 ??
>
>Just curious to see the differences....
http://pluto.njcc.com/~chrisb/benchmark.html
- Chris
------------------------------
chr...@njcc.com
http://pluto.njcc.com/~chrisb/
Eric D. Wiesen
On Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:25:09 -0400, littleboyomega@!juno.com wrote:
>Anthony D. Coppedge wrote:
>>
>> Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
>> 233 ??
>>
>> Just curious to see the differences....
>>
>> -Anthony
>> acop...@mindspring.com
>>
>> "The answers to the top five questions you've always wanted to ask me
>> are: Yes, No, Maybe, Sometimes and I Don't Know"
>
>go PRO; 25% faster....i think 25%. don't really matter cuz the pros
>are faster (just not sure by how much, gimmie a day and i'll look it up
>if ya want the specs).
Cool quote. Wrong information. Pro is 25% faster than Pentium, not
PII, and then only when running fully 32bit Code.
1. There is no such thing as a PPro 233.
2. The PII can use a 440LX motherboard with AGP and SDRAM.
3. Get a PII.
Chris McKernan
Ha. The hardware will continue to be around as long as Bill G continues
to bail them out.
Joseph Maas wrote in article <344FF9...@p4b.com>...
>Anthony D. Coppedge wrote:
>>
>> Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
>> 233 ??
>>
>> Just curious to see the differences....
>>
>> -Anthony
>> acop...@mindspring.com
>
>
littleb...@!juno.com
> >>
> >> Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
> >> 233 ??
> >>
> >> Just curious to see the differences....
> >>
> >> -Anthony
> >> acop...@mindspring.com
> >>
wrong, wrong, wrong.
intels own test (iCOMP index ver2.0)
CHIP: Mhz :RATING
----+-----+---
PII : 300 :332
PII : 266 :303
PII : 233 :267
PRO : 200 :220
PMMX: 233 :203
PMMX: 200 :182
PMMX: 166 :160
P : 200 :142
P : 166 :127
more is BETTER!
littleb...@!juno.com
Sorry! must have been channeling Joseph Maas last night.
BTW the figures are correct, and if he/she wants to go above 200 then
the PII is the ONLY option.
littleb...@!juno.com
Eric D. Wiesen wrote:
>
> On Thu, 23 Oct 1997 23:25:09 -0400, littleboyomega@!juno.com wrote:
>
> >Anthony D. Coppedge wrote:
> >>
> >> Anyone out there run a comparison on a Pentium Pro 233 vs a Pentium II
> >> 233 ??
> >>
> >> Just curious to see the differences....
> >>
> >> -Anthony
> >> acop...@mindspring.com
> >>
> >> "The answers to the top five questions you've always wanted to ask me
> >> are: Yes, No, Maybe, Sometimes and I Don't Know"
> >
> >go PRO; 25% faster....i think 25%. don't really matter cuz the pros
> >are faster (just not sure by how much, gimmie a day and i'll look it up
> >if ya want the specs).
>
> Cool quote. Wrong information. Pro is 25% faster than Pentium, not
> PII, and then only when running fully 32bit Code.
FALSE!
> 1. There is no such thing as a PPro 233.
TRUE!
> 2. The PII can use a 440LX motherboard with AGP and SDRAM.
TRUE!
> 3. Get a PII.
If he/she is going to get a 200mhz chip, then get the pro if going
faster it's not an issue cuz there aren't pros w/ a clock speed above
200.
!!little...@!!juno.com
sledge wrote:
>
> On Sat, 25 Oct 1997 16:29:07 -0400, littleboyomega@!juno.com wrote:
>
> >> CHIP: Mhz :RATING
> >> ----+-----+---
> >> PII : 300 :332
> >> PII : 266 :303
> >> PII : 233 :267
> >> PRO : 200 :220
>
> >Sorry! must have been channeling Joseph Maas last night.
> >
> >BTW the figures are correct, and if he/she wants to go above 200 then
> >the PII is the ONLY option.
>
> and dont forget than INTEL made those benchmarks.. isnt it funny how a
> new version comes out right after they release a new chip.. hmm.
>
> Clock for Clock, the PPRO is faster. Oc a ppro to 233 and u have
> P2/266+ performance. Dont go by benchmarks. Go by real world speed.
>
> Then use the $300 u save to get some more memory - u never have enough
> of that stuff.
agree whole heartedly