I have looked at many dozens of fonts at many online sites and have
not found one that has the 'tails' on the capitals, the bulbous 'U',
the straight sides on the 'W' and the backslash at the end stroke of
the 'h' that are all in the same set.
The letters are on a church sign that is at least 25, and may be up to
45 years old. I would certainly appreciate any help you can give me. I
have run out of gas in my search.
Thanks and regards,
Old Beeg
The following match pretty well EXCEPT for the "W".
One of the closest would be "CyrillicGoth"
http://www.tut-vse.ru/ttf/Fonts/RNormal/CYGO____.TTF
Also OtterDB
Here's a download link.
http://www.fontemple.com/free-download/8389-OtterDB-Normal.html
This is also available as "Carlings Light"
The "W" is close to the W from "Emgraves SH" (but without the tail)
http://www.ffonts.net/EmGravesSH.font
The almost infinite number of combinations of different attributes for
each character in a blackletter typeface makes it very difficult to
find matches for older texts, unless they happen to have been made
from metal fonts that have since been digitized. This is particularly
true for architectural lettering and signs, which were often created
by hand.
- Charactger
Many thanks,
Old Beeg
It looks very much like Wedding Text -- including the tail on the W --
except for the upper-case letter at the beginning of the second word.
That one might even be a variant of T or a ligature involving T.
Go to <http://bowfinprintworks.com/Script03Pg1.html>. A sample of
Wedding Text is the second one down on the right.
My copy of Wedding Text is by Bitstream.
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>.
Don't ask "Why is there road rage?" Instead, ask
"Why NOT Road Rage?" or "Why Is There No Such
Thing as Fast Enough?"
<http://www.rossde.com/roadrage.html>
It's not Bitstream Wedding Text (with the possible exception of the
first letter). Look at the tails on the cap-M and lower-h; they are
completely different.
The font looks like Old English Text (M F Benton, 1901) except for the
first letter. That cap at the start of the second word is a U. It would
be nice to see more letters of the alphabet, as there's not much there
to go on.
The first letter looks like a Wedding Text W but it is heavier (bolder).
>> It looks very much like Wedding Text -- including the tail on the W --
>> except for the upper-case letter at the beginning of the second word.
>> That one might even be a variant of T or a ligature involving T.
>>
>
> It's not Bitstream Wedding Text (with the possible exception of the
> first letter). Look at the tails on the cap-M and lower-h; they are
> completely different.
>
> The font looks like Old English Text (M F Benton, 1901) except for the
> first letter. That cap at the start of the second word is a U. It would
> be nice to see more letters of the alphabet, as there's not much there
> to go on.
>
> The first letter looks like a Wedding Text W but it is heavier (bolder).
>
May I remind everyone that the inquiry is about HAND-PAINTED
LETTERING!!! It is not likely to exactly match any commercial font, so
it is fruitless to niggle the details. The OP was looking for something
"close enough," I think.
> > . . .
> > The font looks like Old English Text (M F Benton, 1901) except for the
> > first letter. That cap at the start of the second word is a U. It would
> > be nice to see more letters of the alphabet, as there's not much there
> > to go on.
> >
> > The first letter looks like a Wedding Text W but it is heavier (bolder).
> > (Jane)
> May I remind everyone that the inquiry is about HAND-PAINTED
> LETTERING!!! It is not likely to exactly match any commercial font . .
> . . .The OP was looking for something "close enough," I think.
> (Dick)
My hope to find 'the' font has taken a hit from the fact of it being
old hand-lettering -- which is not something I had taken into account.
The letters shown on my linked graphic are a shortened form of the
church sign I took a picture of, with all the duplicates removed to
make looking at the letters that are available easier.
There have been fonts that are close, in particular for the lower
case. It is the 'h' that seems to make a set worth using. But it's
always the 'W' and the 'U' that seem to be different. The suggested
fonts have given me good places to compare. It looks like I'll end up
with three fonts, one for lowers, one for the W and another for the U.
Thanks to all for your input. It's often as good to know when to stop
the search and use what is available as it could be to find the
'perfect' solution.
All my best,
Old Beeg
> The letters shown on my linked graphic are a shortened form of the
> church sign I took a picture of, with all the duplicates removed to
> make looking at the letters that are available easier.
It would be interesting to see the entire sign.
- Character
I should have done this in the first place:
http://www.oldbeeg.com/images/sign.gif
Old Beeg
Hi
If I may add to that: it is indeed based on the Old English (sometimes
called Engravers Old English) typeface and the calligrapher made some
adaptations. He or she in fact made it more difficult, because it
taken a lot of practise to produce the thin dots on the i with a quill
pen cut from a goose feather. It took me years to master that.
Cheers
Richard