This client has a Panasonic KX-TD1232 without any voice mail,
using 7433 sets that have the XDP jack. They tell me that they
want to be able to record phone calls from about a half dozen of
the stations for later transcription.
They already use microcassettes from handheld voice recorders
for dictation. The typist plays them back in their Lanier machine.
These microcassettes get recorded at standard speed (1.2 or 2.4 cm/sec.)
The only problem is that these handheld voice recorders have no
jack for external input -- only a jack for external earphone.
So if I set the XDP jacks to parallel (which should make them
work as analog extensions of the digital jack) and get a few
phone recorders that work off the line (as opposed to working
off the handset cord), should this do the trick? They're not ready
to spend the $800 or more for a Panasonic VM unit, which could
accomplish the same thing. I figure I can get 6 phone recorders
for no more than $50 each.
Also, any recommendations for appropriate microcassette phone recorders
that aren't answering machines?
Thanks.
So you can:
a. use the handset adapters
b. record off the co line itself
c. use 7700 series phones, then the analog pair is really carrying the audio
d. spend money
You can get a call recorder adapter made for the Panasonic digital phones,
it takes the digital signal into the USB port of a pc, there it converts it
into an audio .wav file. They are not cheap though, at about $300 each
(cost of voicemail starts to look better...) -www.ablecomm.com has the
recording adapters.
charles
"Someone" <som...@somewhere.org> wrote in message
news:106jtvj...@news.supernews.com...
> The "parallel" programming setting is for the ringing of the parallel jack not to let
two
> phones work simultaneously.
You're right. It was after I posted my message that I remembered
the way parallel programming worked (from a similar exercise a few
years ago.)
> So you can:
> a. use the handset adapters
That's what we'll do. The P5045 by P3 looks like a good buy at $35 each.
"Someone" <som...@somewhere.org> wrote in message
news:106jtvj...@news.supernews.com...