Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

How can I use PRI interface to ISDN Access Server ?

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Young W. Son

unread,
Aug 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM8/26/98
to
Hello ...

I have one PRI module (PA-2CE1/PRI-120) and ISDN PRI line.
and, I want to use this interface to ISDN Access Server.
but, I don't know how to configure the router (Cisco7513).

Please show me some example for ISDN configuration.

Thanks for your reading.


Markus Renc

unread,
Aug 26, 1998, 3:00:00 AM8/26/98
to
Hello
This is an example for E1 PRI and Dialer Interface.
.

isdn switch-type primary-net5 (German switch-type)
!
controller E1 1/0
pri-group timeslots 1-31

interface Serial1/0:15 (D-Channel if you have an isdn switch-type
primary-net5;or interface Serial1/0:23
it depends on ,how many b-channels do you have.)
description PMX-ISDN 96F / xxxx ( Service - Dial-In/Out )
no ip address
encapsulation ppp
no ip mroute-cache
bandwidth 1984
dialer pool-member 1
no fair-queue
no cdp enable


interface Dialer98
description Dial-In
ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.252
encapsulation ppp
bandwidth 64
dialer remote-name xyz
dialer string 1234567890 class Dial
dialer caller 0815
dialer pool 1
dialer-group 1
no cdp enable
ppp authentication chap

dialer-list 1 protocol ip permit

I hope this helps

Markus

Young W. Son <yw...@shinsegi.com> schrieb im Beitrag
<6s0ou1$b34$1...@news.nuri.net>...

André Pirard

unread,
Sep 18, 1998, 3:00:00 AM9/18/98
to
"Markus Renc" <mr...@metronet.de> wrote:
>This is an example for E1 PRI and Dialer Interface.
>
>[abridging example...]

>
>interface Serial1/0:15 (D-Channel if you have an isdn switch-type
> dialer pool-member 1
>
>interface Dialer98

> ip address 192.168.100.1 255.255.255.252
> encapsulation ppp
> dialer remote-name xyz
> dialer string 1234567890 class Dial
> dialer caller 0815
> dialer pool 1
> dialer-group 1
> ppp authentication chap

I have tried what is basically this, but with several Dialer
interfaces assigned to dialer-group 1.
My goal was to have certain calling users recognized by name and/or by
calling phone number, assigned their own Dialer interface and be
provided with callback and/or their own IP address in it.

My first problem was that I consistently was asked to assign a
remote-name to each Dialer interface albeit I wanted one of them to
apply as default when no other interface matched the caller.

My second problem was that debugging dialer showed that, although no
remote-name matched the caller, one dialer interface was still used
but that I couldn't predict which of several.
If I have interfaces with remote-name "paul" and "john" and that I am
compelled to set a name such as "anybody" for the interface I want to
be used as default, how can I have everyone else use interface
"anybody" when there seems to be no rule as to which of these 3
interfaces is the default (and why is remote-name required in the
first place?)?

Now, is Dialer Profile the best for what I want to do, or will Legacy
DDR be better in my case?
I find Dialer Profile appealing because it sets no limit on the
interface parameters I can customize, versus Legacy being restricted
to a single interface definition.
I cannot afford defining interface characteristics in an external DB.

Best regards,

André.

0 new messages