I try to divide a C-class net into 8 parts:
I want to divide 193.155.164.0 into
193.155.164.0 - 193.155.164.31
193.155.164.32 - 193.155.164.63
193.155.164.64 - ...
If I try to manages routes:
ip route 193.155.164.0 255.255.255.224 next-hop I get following error:
inconsistent address and netmask
if I set netmask to 255.255.255.0 then it works (naturally)
ip route 193.155.164.32 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
ip route 193.155.164.64 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
what could it be?
Best regards
Adnan Mumbasic
best regards
Matthias
--
Dr. Matthias Ploner tel. 039-471-555503
Dnet s.r.l. fax. 039-471-555500
Via Galvani 33 e-mail: ma...@dnet.it
39100 Bolzano http://www.dnet.it
Subnetting with a subnet address of zero generally is not allowed
because of the confusion inherent in having a network and a subnet
with indistinguishable addresses. For example, if network 131.108.0.0
is subnetted as 255.255.255.0, subnet zero would be written as
131.108.0.0 -- which is identical to the network address.
See also:
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/3.html
- paul
--
Paul Ferguson || ||
Consulting Engineering || ||
Reston, Virginia USA |||| ||||
tel: +1.703.716.9538 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
e-mail: pfer...@cisco.com c i s c o S y s t e m s
Srinivas
=>>Hello,
=>>
=>>I try to divide a C-class net into 8 parts:
=>>I want to divide 193.155.164.0 into
=>>
=>>193.155.164.0 - 193.155.164.31
=>>193.155.164.32 - 193.155.164.63
=>>193.155.164.64 - ...
=>>
=>>If I try to manages routes:
=>>
=>>ip route 193.155.164.0 255.255.255.224 next-hop I get following error:
=>>inconsistent address and netmask
=>>if I set netmask to 255.255.255.0 then it works (naturally)
=>>
=>>ip route 193.155.164.32 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
=>>ip route 193.155.164.64 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
=>>
=>>
=>>what could it be?
=>>
=>>Best regards
=>>
=>>
=>>Adnan Mumbasic
>:The [sub]network address you are attempting to use resides in IP subnet 0.
>:Use the global command 'ip subnet-zero' to allow usage of host
>:addresses which reside in this subnet.
>:Subnetting with a subnet address of zero generally is not allowed
>:because of the confusion inherent in having a network and a subnet
>:with indistinguishable addresses. For example, if network 131.108.0.0
>:is subnetted as 255.255.255.0, subnet zero would be written as
>:131.108.0.0 -- which is identical to the network address.
>:See also:
>: http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/701/3.html
>:
>:- paul
>:At 12:42 PM 7/29/96 +0200, Adnan Mumbasic wrote:
>:>Hello,
>:>
>:>I try to divide a C-class net into 8 parts:
>:>I want to divide 193.155.164.0 into
>:>
>:>193.155.164.0 - 193.155.164.31
>:>193.155.164.32 - 193.155.164.63
>:>193.155.164.64 - ...
>:>
>:>If I try to manages routes:
>:>
>:>ip route 193.155.164.0 255.255.255.224 next-hop I get following error:
>:>inconsistent address and netmask
>:>if I set netmask to 255.255.255.0 then it works (naturally)
>:>
>:>ip route 193.155.164.32 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
>:>ip route 193.155.164.64 255.255.255.224 next-hop is o.k
>:>
>:>
>:>what could it be?
>:>
>:>Best regards
>:>
>:>
>:>Adnan Mumbasic
>:>
>:--
>:Paul Ferguson || ||
>:Consulting Engineering || ||
>:Reston, Virginia USA |||| ||||
>:tel: +1.703.716.9538 ..:||||||:..:||||||:..
>:e-mail: pfer...@cisco.com c i s c o S y s t e m s
Loud
**************************************************
World Access, the easy way to Internet
P.O. Box 757, NL-3430 AT Nieuwegein
World Access Servicelijn 030-60 70 600
E-Mail: in...@worldaccess.nl
**************************************************