Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
CodeBase for C
68 views
Skip to first unread message
Mr. Man-wai Chang
Nov 21, 2016, 7:33:42 AM11/21/16
to
Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?
Mr. Man-wai Chang
Nov 21, 2016, 7:35:37 AM11/21/16
to
On 21/11/2016 8:33 PM, Mr. Man-wai Chang wrote:
>
> Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?
http://fox.wikis.com/wc.dll?Wiki~CodeBase
>
> Anyone used it before? Is it faster than SQLite?
Geoff Barnard
Nov 24, 2016, 5:48:45 PM11/24/16
to
Hello,
Don't know? Please detail just what you mean.
I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some
fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific
program is trying to do. To answer your question in the limited way you
ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same
system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.
If an operation can be made server-intensive, I'd expect that the SQL
version could be faster. If there's a LOT of user interaction required,
then I'd expect that the CodeBase version could be faster. Again, memory
available could make a difference.
Happy to discuss further?
Geoff
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:o0upi3$l85$1...@dont-email.me...
Don't know? Please detail just what you mean.
I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some
fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific
program is trying to do. To answer your question in the limited way you
ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same
system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.
If an operation can be made server-intensive, I'd expect that the SQL
version could be faster. If there's a LOT of user interaction required,
then I'd expect that the CodeBase version could be faster. Again, memory
available could make a difference.
Happy to discuss further?
Geoff
"Mr. Man-wai Chang" <toylet...@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:o0upi3$l85$1...@dont-email.me...
Mr. Man-wai Chang
Nov 25, 2016, 3:59:16 AM11/25/16
to
On 25/11/2016 6:49 AM, Geoff Barnard wrote:
> I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some
> fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
> dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific
> program is trying to do. To answer your question in the limited way you
> ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same
> system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.
1. Does CodeBase 5 have SQL commands?
> I'm using CodeBase 5 (Sequiter) both single user and via network, with some
> fairly large files, and generally it's pretty fast, but it's really
> dependant on memory available, and programming, and just what any specific
> program is trying to do. To answer your question in the limited way you
> ask it, I'd need to create a program that does the same 'task' on the same
> system (network or stand alone ?) and time each.
2. Did you also try SQLite?
Geoff Barnard
Nov 25, 2016, 8:45:55 AM11/25/16
to
No, CodeBase 5 does not directly support any SQL commands, although you will
be aware that many of the commands available within xbase are very similar
to many SQL commands, and both may have a similar origin. So a lot of what
you might do with SQL can be achieved with CodeBase.
No, I have not used SQLite, although I have used SQL and MySQL, using
FreeBasic software.
news:o18ueo$e27$6...@dont-email.me...
be aware that many of the commands available within xbase are very similar
to many SQL commands, and both may have a similar origin. So a lot of what
you might do with SQL can be achieved with CodeBase.
No, I have not used SQLite, although I have used SQL and MySQL, using
FreeBasic software.
news:o18ueo$e27$6...@dont-email.me...
0 new messages