Thanks,
Julio
-----Mensagem original-----
De: owner-inf...@iiug.org [mailto:owner-inf...@iiug.org] Em
nome de Obnoxio The Clown
Enviada em: quinta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2004 11:21
Para: inform...@iiug.org
Assunto: RE: Whatcha' wanta have?????
Julio Cesar wrote:
> A except clause in a select * from table would be great.
>
> This would be very helpful for cases when you have a bunch of columns in a
> table and you need either to select or unload almost all of them,
> excluding 1, 2 or more columns.
That is impressively lazy.
--
"C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien à dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
- Coluche
---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 6/2/2004
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.580 / Virus Database: 367 - Release Date: 6/2/2004
sending to informix-list
M.P.
"Julio Cesar" <ju...@prodesmaq.com.br> wrote in message
news:c12vu0$25d$1...@terabinaries.xmission.com...
>
> Obnoxio, I'm sorry but I can't agree with you, 'cause I have tables with
> more than 150 columns and doing a query to retry 148 columns, or unload
this
> kind of table really sucks.
> I actually saw many people complaining about that.
>
> Thanks,
> Julio
>
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: owner-inf...@iiug.org [mailto:owner-inf...@iiug.org] Em
> nome de Obnoxio The Clown
> Enviada em: quinta-feira, 19 de fevereiro de 2004 11:21
> Para: inform...@iiug.org
> Assunto: RE: Whatcha' wanta have?????
>
> Julio Cesar wrote:
>
> > A except clause in a select * from table would be great.
> >
> > This would be very helpful for cases when you have a bunch of columns in
a
> > table and you need either to select or unload almost all of them,
> > excluding 1, 2 or more columns.
>
> That is impressively lazy.
>
> --
> "C'est pas parce qu'on n'a rien ą dire qu'il faut fermer sa gueule"
> Obnoxio, I'm sorry but I can't agree with you, 'cause I have tables with
> more than 150 columns and doing a query to retry 148 columns, or unload
> this kind of table really sucks.
Interesting table design.
> I actually saw many people complaining about that.
Mostly lazy ones, is my guess. :o)
> -----Mensagem original-----
> De: owner-inf...@iiug.org [mailto:owner-inf...@iiug.org] Em
>