IDS 11 and Kerberos

da...@smooth1.co.uk

unread,

Oct 7, 2008, 6:11:49 PM10/7/08

to

Hello all,

So IDS 11 now has Kerberos integration and comes with a library
$INFORMIXDIR/lib/csm/libixgss.so for this integration.

There are two types of Kerberos (MIT and Heimdal), so for Redhat AS 4
which version of Kerberos did IBM
use to build their library?

Which Kerberos have they tested against and which ones will they
support? MIT or Heimdal or both?
And which versions of each?

Also apparently there can be different entries in the keytab file,
which entries will the Informix library
support?

I opened a PMR but the IBM support guy did not tell me...

Regards,
David.

Manoj Mohan

unread,

Oct 7, 2008, 6:19:09 PM10/7/08

to da...@smooth1.co.uk, informix-l...@iiug.org, inform...@iiug.org

MIT kerberos.

Manoj
"da...@smooth1.co.uk" <da...@smooth1.co.uk>

"da...@smooth1.co.uk" <da...@smooth1.co.uk>

Sent by: informix-l...@iiug.org

10/07/2008 05:11 PM

To	inform...@iiug.org
cc
Subject	IDS 11 and Kerberos

_______________________________________________ Informix-list mailing list Inform...@iiug.orghttp://www.iiug.org/mailman/listinfo/informix-list

ralf.bla...@eurotaxschwacke.de

unread,

Oct 7, 2008, 6:37:23 PM10/7/08

to

Kerberos is working well on my IDS 11.50FC1 ons SLES 10 SP1 and PAM
enabled in sqlhosts. Problem for me was, that our ODBC-Driver did nort
support PAM (but no problem with original IFX-Driver).

Manoj Mohan schrieb:
> MIT kerberos.
>
> Manoj
>
>
>
> "da...@smooth1.co
> .uk"
> <da...@smooth1.co To
> .uk> inform...@iiug.org
> Sent by: cc
> informix-list-bou
> nc...@iiug.org Subject
> IDS 11 and Kerberos
>
> 10/07/2008 05:11
> PM

TBP

unread,

Oct 8, 2008, 3:06:20 AM10/8/08

to

PMR number?

da...@smooth1.co.uk

unread,

Oct 16, 2008, 3:17:16 PM10/16/08

to

On 8 Oct, 08:06, TBP <TheBigPota...@nothere.co.uk> wrote:
> On Oct 7, 11:11 pm, "da...@smooth1.co.uk" <da...@smooth1.co.uk> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> > Hello all,
>

> > So IDS 11 now hasKerberosintegration and comes with a library
> > $INFORMIXDIR/lib/csm/libixgss.so for this integration.
>
> > There are two types ofKerberos(MIT and Heimdal), so for Redhat AS 4
> > which version ofKerberosdid IBM

> > use to build their library?
>

> > WhichKerberoshave they tested against and which ones will they

> > support? MIT or Heimdal or both?
> > And which versions of each?
>
> > Also apparently there can be different entries in the keytab file,
> > which entries will the Informix library
> > support?
>
> > I opened a PMR but the IBM support guy did not tell me...
>
> > Regards,
> > David.
>

> PMR number?- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Email me directly at davi...@yahoo.co.uk and we can talk.

da...@smooth1.co.uk

unread,

Oct 22, 2008, 2:51:24 PM10/22/08

to

> Email me directly at davidm...@yahoo.co.uk and we can talk.- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

No emails recevied so far, I am not impressed.

TBP

unread,

Oct 23, 2008, 7:10:24 AM10/23/08

to

What is the issue with putting the PMR number here?

da...@smooth1.co.uk

unread,

Oct 23, 2008, 3:22:40 PM10/23/08

to

> What is the issue with putting the PMR number here?- Hide quoted text -

>
> - Show quoted text -

Here is public not private.

Obnoxio The Clown

unread,

Oct 23, 2008, 3:27:18 PM10/23/08

to inform...@iiug.org

And what woe do you imagine will befall you if you should reveal the PMR
number? Only IBMers will be able to do anything with it.

--
Cheers,
Obnoxio The Clown

http://obotheclown.blogspot.com

InDeep

unread,

Oct 23, 2008, 6:16:22 PM10/23/08

to

Obnoxio The Clown wrote:

>>> - Show quoted text -
>>
>> Here is public not private.
>
> And what woe do you imagine will befall you if you should reveal the PMR
> number? Only IBMers will be able to do anything with it.
>

Good to see David is still getting good pharmaceuticals...

*<8o)

14inf...@gmail.com

unread,

Oct 24, 2008, 2:58:14 AM10/24/08

to

I believe InDeep said:

MIKE SEGAL AND EVERYONE ELSE.

STOP USING MY REAL NAME

THERE IS A FUCKING REASON WHY I POST ANON, JUST LIKE EVERY OTHER
FUCKING
ASSHOLE HERE WHO POSTS HERE ANON INCLUDING THE CLOWN AND THE OTHER
FOLKS THAT ARE TRYING TO PROTECT THEIR FUCKING PRIVACY GODDAMIT

ITS CALLED FUCKING GOOGLE AND PEOPLE LIKE SPHINCTER WHO WANT TO
THREATEN YOUR FAMILY AND LIFE. IF YOU DONT GET THAT PLEASE IGNORE
THIS
POST AND CONTINUE TO VOTE FOR JOHN MCCAIN, NOTHING ELSE I WOULD SAY
HERE
WOULD MATTER TO YOU.

I DIDN'T THINK I WOULD HAVE TO FUCKING SPELL IT OUT SO PLEASE STOP
USING MY REAL NAME

STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME
STOP USING MY REAL NAME

GET IT?

THANK YOU!

IF YOU KNOW WHO I AM THATS REALLY COOL NOW LEAVE ME THE FUCK ALONE
ABOUT IT
AND STOP USING MY REAL NAME. GOOGLE AND ASSHOLES LIKE SPHINCTER WILL
USE IT AGAINST ME. JESUS I HATE TO HAVE TO FUCKING SPELL IT OUT FOR
YOU AND
FUCKING RAVI, SO PLEASE READ THIS AND SHUT THE FUCK UP ABOUT IT.

I RESPECT OTHERS WHO POST ANON SO PLEASE RESPECT MY WISHES TO DO THE
SAME.