Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
How Microsoft invented filesystem compression
84 views
Skip to first unread message
Johny Mannings
May 26, 2012, 6:38:21 AM5/26/12
to
The secret of Microsoft's success.
Microsoft has special people who search everywhere on the internet
for anything that might be a technological advance in mostly software
technology because software is easy to steal, buy or copy.
In the 1980's Bill Gates had seen cp/m from Gary Kildall and told IBM
that Microsoft could provide an operating system. Bill Gates and
Steve Ballmer simply bought a cheap cp/m rip-off named Q-dos for
$50,000 illegally stolen by Tim Paterson who simply copied it from
disassembled cp/m machine code. Gary Kildall found out and tried to
sue IBM and Microsoft. Unfortunately for Gary, Bill Gates father was
a powerfull lawyer employed by the Rockefeller family, so the judge
made a statement. For every PC wheter an original IBM or a IBM clone,
customers had to pay Microsoft even when the customer only wanted
Gary's cp/m based dr-dos. These practises are still used by Microsoft
today. If you want a laptop or PC you are forced to buy it with a
Microsoft product named Windows. They pretend you have a choice to
not pay for Windows. Usually if you do not want Windows, they have to
take out the harddrive with its Windows recovery partition and to
replace it with a clean harddrive. So buying a PC or laptop without
Windows will simply cost you more. Most stores however simply refuse
you to sell the PC or laptop if you don't want Windows.
Did Microsoft invented Windows themselves? Is Windows stolen
technology?
And Bill Gates had seen Xerox Star so he bought such a Xerox Star
machine (made in 1978), it would take Microsoft 13 years to duplicate
its operating system capabilities, and they named it Windows 3.1.
Meanwhile Gary Kildall got a tragic accident, unexplainable head
injury wich caused his death shortly after writing a book that Bill
Gates and Steve Ballmer steal technology from whomever they can.
Gary's son is still scared of Microsoft so the book remains sealed.
And Microsoft kept on stealing technology. Visicalc became Microsofy
Excell. Borland became Microsoft Developer Studio, Wordstar became
Microsoft word. Netscape became Internet Explorer. 3dFx became
Microsoft directX, Lernaut&Hauspie became Microsoft speech synthesis
and recognition. Even the Windows 95 taskbar and startmenu where
stolen from a graphical user interface made by another company in
1987 than named Icon Bar.
Almost nobody knows the original inventors of the by Microsoft stolen
technology and about the highly unexplainable death rates under
original software inventors. Who knows Stacker? The company from who
Microsoft stole their compression technology for filesystems? Even
fat32 the filesystem for wich other companies have to pay Microsoft
for, was stolen. Microsoft hires special companies to scare
programmers and inventors with braindead, cardiac arrest, lifelong
unemployement, lifelong prosecution, tragic car accidents (Avalon
programmer found dead, Netscape programmers found blood on their
PC's, programmers wrapped and choked to death naked in their own
bedsheets, Gary Kildall's dead, Remy Belvaux's dead, and many
more....) These programmers had all one thing in common, they made
something Microsoft wanted, and for some reason Bill Gates and Steve
Ballmer simply for no reason wanted them dead. All Microsoft does is
hire professional companies to search and kill programmers for their
code, work or something else Microsoft wants or sees as a threat.
This is Microsoft's business model.
In 2001 e.g. a second grade university student made the graphical
command line interface. You just had to see it to know it was
innovative. You typed in commands just like dos but it had the same
capabilities like a webbrowser and came with its own compiler for it.
Imagine a dos prompt with images, buttons, windows, 3d reality, video
support, the internet as if it where a directory on your local
harddrive. And steve....@ceo.microsoft.com and
bill....@chairman.microsoft.com send the young programmer a
contract that he would never talk about it, that it now was Microsoft
property, Microsoft would not have to pay any costs. But the
programmer refused and mailed them he would make it open source. And
Steve Ballmer mailed the student it would be tragic to suffer a
tragic and horrifying death.
You can search google for 'Steve Ballmer kill....' and you will find
that Steve Ballmer even threatens highly placed people with death and
evenso boasted that he killed people before.
You don't have to guess, the programmer who made the graphical
commandline interface got infected with a tragic bacteria from his
PC's keyboard, got blind and later went into coma and drained in his
own blood when his lungs collapsed vomiting blood in the process.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have special ruthless people specialised
in these kind of crimes. The programmers girlfriend experienced a
tragic unexplainable head trauma causing prolonged coma, she will
never talk again.
These things happen because people believe Bill Gates and Steve
Ballmer are kind and loving persons. Students who invent innovative
products really believe Microsoft is an honest business.
Meanwhile Bill Gates paid over $40 million dollar to elect George
Bush. The first thing Bush did was dropping all antitrust charges
from many companies all over America against Microsoft providing Bill
Gates and Steve Ballmer with diplomatic immunity. Bill also finances
Bush his reelection. As a member of the Gates family Bill and
Microsoft have all the support from the highest than CIA official
Robert Gates, the Rockerfellers and Rothschilds. Microsofts bribes
law officials, police officers, hires companies like Blackwater all
to kill off anyone who they can steal from.
But why does Microsoft not provide the customer with a graphical
command line interface? The answer is simple, no matter how good
something might be, it does not force people to buy more copies of
Microsoft Windows. The graphical commandline interface will one day
show up as an invention by Microsoft Research just like oil companies
kill off inventors who make engines a tiny bit more efficient.
Compare Microsoft's power with an oil company. One big oil company
named Microsoft stealing and killing people who have little bits of
oil and then forcing customers to buy Microsoft oil, and a small tiny
oil company named Apple, and a company giving their oil away for free
named Linux.
Microsoft will ever have to keep on killing young smart but naive
programmers all over the world especially before they might
contribute to Linux. Microsoft deliberately keeps stolen technology
off the market, reducing advancement in operating systems.
Innovative young smart and naive programmers are simply murdered
before they can contribute to Linux. These pour souls believe in the
lie that Microsoft pays for an invention.
Like steve....@ceo.microsoft.com once said to such a tragic soul
'Nothing provides me more pleasure than to know you will die an
extremely painful death!'
Read more search on google for 'Why I hate Microsoft'
'Xerox Star'
'Programmer found dead'
'Gary Kildall the man who could have been Bill Gates'
'Steve Ballmer kill...'
'Microsoft's touch of death'
When Bush was reelected people thought the voting computers where
messed with. You can search for how many Diebold computerprogrammers
where found dead suddenly. This is the business model of Microsoft,
even bribing the president. See Bush and Gates together celebrating
their crimes, google for 'bill gates and bush' on google image
search.
The only solution for young programmers is to not innovate. To not
make software wich never has been made before. And if they still want
to do it, they have to work for free by making it open source and
work with many other open source people. Sure Steve Ballmer calls
Linux programmers cancers who attach themselves to Microsofts
intellectual property, but these programmers have no other choice.
Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several
manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market
determines a fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly
high profit margins over 80%, they simply force their customers to
buy it, they kill off any competition. Communism means everything
belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft
(they even own the president), so Microsoft is far more likely like
communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any unknowing naive
programmer facing an evil never seen in the software industry before.
Believe me,...
Microsoft has special people who search everywhere on the internet
for anything that might be a technological advance in mostly software
technology because software is easy to steal, buy or copy.
In the 1980's Bill Gates had seen cp/m from Gary Kildall and told IBM
that Microsoft could provide an operating system. Bill Gates and
Steve Ballmer simply bought a cheap cp/m rip-off named Q-dos for
$50,000 illegally stolen by Tim Paterson who simply copied it from
disassembled cp/m machine code. Gary Kildall found out and tried to
sue IBM and Microsoft. Unfortunately for Gary, Bill Gates father was
a powerfull lawyer employed by the Rockefeller family, so the judge
made a statement. For every PC wheter an original IBM or a IBM clone,
customers had to pay Microsoft even when the customer only wanted
Gary's cp/m based dr-dos. These practises are still used by Microsoft
today. If you want a laptop or PC you are forced to buy it with a
Microsoft product named Windows. They pretend you have a choice to
not pay for Windows. Usually if you do not want Windows, they have to
take out the harddrive with its Windows recovery partition and to
replace it with a clean harddrive. So buying a PC or laptop without
Windows will simply cost you more. Most stores however simply refuse
you to sell the PC or laptop if you don't want Windows.
Did Microsoft invented Windows themselves? Is Windows stolen
technology?
And Bill Gates had seen Xerox Star so he bought such a Xerox Star
machine (made in 1978), it would take Microsoft 13 years to duplicate
its operating system capabilities, and they named it Windows 3.1.
Meanwhile Gary Kildall got a tragic accident, unexplainable head
injury wich caused his death shortly after writing a book that Bill
Gates and Steve Ballmer steal technology from whomever they can.
Gary's son is still scared of Microsoft so the book remains sealed.
And Microsoft kept on stealing technology. Visicalc became Microsofy
Excell. Borland became Microsoft Developer Studio, Wordstar became
Microsoft word. Netscape became Internet Explorer. 3dFx became
Microsoft directX, Lernaut&Hauspie became Microsoft speech synthesis
and recognition. Even the Windows 95 taskbar and startmenu where
stolen from a graphical user interface made by another company in
1987 than named Icon Bar.
Almost nobody knows the original inventors of the by Microsoft stolen
technology and about the highly unexplainable death rates under
original software inventors. Who knows Stacker? The company from who
Microsoft stole their compression technology for filesystems? Even
fat32 the filesystem for wich other companies have to pay Microsoft
for, was stolen. Microsoft hires special companies to scare
programmers and inventors with braindead, cardiac arrest, lifelong
unemployement, lifelong prosecution, tragic car accidents (Avalon
programmer found dead, Netscape programmers found blood on their
PC's, programmers wrapped and choked to death naked in their own
bedsheets, Gary Kildall's dead, Remy Belvaux's dead, and many
more....) These programmers had all one thing in common, they made
something Microsoft wanted, and for some reason Bill Gates and Steve
Ballmer simply for no reason wanted them dead. All Microsoft does is
hire professional companies to search and kill programmers for their
code, work or something else Microsoft wants or sees as a threat.
This is Microsoft's business model.
In 2001 e.g. a second grade university student made the graphical
command line interface. You just had to see it to know it was
innovative. You typed in commands just like dos but it had the same
capabilities like a webbrowser and came with its own compiler for it.
Imagine a dos prompt with images, buttons, windows, 3d reality, video
support, the internet as if it where a directory on your local
harddrive. And steve....@ceo.microsoft.com and
bill....@chairman.microsoft.com send the young programmer a
contract that he would never talk about it, that it now was Microsoft
property, Microsoft would not have to pay any costs. But the
programmer refused and mailed them he would make it open source. And
Steve Ballmer mailed the student it would be tragic to suffer a
tragic and horrifying death.
You can search google for 'Steve Ballmer kill....' and you will find
that Steve Ballmer even threatens highly placed people with death and
evenso boasted that he killed people before.
You don't have to guess, the programmer who made the graphical
commandline interface got infected with a tragic bacteria from his
PC's keyboard, got blind and later went into coma and drained in his
own blood when his lungs collapsed vomiting blood in the process.
Bill Gates and Steve Ballmer have special ruthless people specialised
in these kind of crimes. The programmers girlfriend experienced a
tragic unexplainable head trauma causing prolonged coma, she will
never talk again.
These things happen because people believe Bill Gates and Steve
Ballmer are kind and loving persons. Students who invent innovative
products really believe Microsoft is an honest business.
Meanwhile Bill Gates paid over $40 million dollar to elect George
Bush. The first thing Bush did was dropping all antitrust charges
from many companies all over America against Microsoft providing Bill
Gates and Steve Ballmer with diplomatic immunity. Bill also finances
Bush his reelection. As a member of the Gates family Bill and
Microsoft have all the support from the highest than CIA official
Robert Gates, the Rockerfellers and Rothschilds. Microsofts bribes
law officials, police officers, hires companies like Blackwater all
to kill off anyone who they can steal from.
But why does Microsoft not provide the customer with a graphical
command line interface? The answer is simple, no matter how good
something might be, it does not force people to buy more copies of
Microsoft Windows. The graphical commandline interface will one day
show up as an invention by Microsoft Research just like oil companies
kill off inventors who make engines a tiny bit more efficient.
Compare Microsoft's power with an oil company. One big oil company
named Microsoft stealing and killing people who have little bits of
oil and then forcing customers to buy Microsoft oil, and a small tiny
oil company named Apple, and a company giving their oil away for free
named Linux.
Microsoft will ever have to keep on killing young smart but naive
programmers all over the world especially before they might
contribute to Linux. Microsoft deliberately keeps stolen technology
off the market, reducing advancement in operating systems.
Innovative young smart and naive programmers are simply murdered
before they can contribute to Linux. These pour souls believe in the
lie that Microsoft pays for an invention.
Like steve....@ceo.microsoft.com once said to such a tragic soul
'Nothing provides me more pleasure than to know you will die an
extremely painful death!'
Read more search on google for 'Why I hate Microsoft'
'Xerox Star'
'Programmer found dead'
'Gary Kildall the man who could have been Bill Gates'
'Steve Ballmer kill...'
'Microsoft's touch of death'
When Bush was reelected people thought the voting computers where
messed with. You can search for how many Diebold computerprogrammers
where found dead suddenly. This is the business model of Microsoft,
even bribing the president. See Bush and Gates together celebrating
their crimes, google for 'bill gates and bush' on google image
search.
The only solution for young programmers is to not innovate. To not
make software wich never has been made before. And if they still want
to do it, they have to work for free by making it open source and
work with many other open source people. Sure Steve Ballmer calls
Linux programmers cancers who attach themselves to Microsofts
intellectual property, but these programmers have no other choice.
Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several
manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market
determines a fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly
high profit margins over 80%, they simply force their customers to
buy it, they kill off any competition. Communism means everything
belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft
(they even own the president), so Microsoft is far more likely like
communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any unknowing naive
programmer facing an evil never seen in the software industry before.
Believe me,...
Stephen Wolstenholme
May 26, 2012, 7:04:31 AM5/26/12
to
On Sat, 26 May 2012 12:38:21 +0200, Johny Mannings
<johny.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Microsoft has special people who search everywhere on the internet
>for anything that might be a technological advance in mostly software
>technology because software is easy to steal, buy or copy.
As do most other big companies. It called licensing in some cases.
<johny.m...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Microsoft has special people who search everywhere on the internet
>for anything that might be a technological advance in mostly software
>technology because software is easy to steal, buy or copy.
Steve
--
Neural Network Software. http://www.npsl1.com
EasyNN-plus. Neural Networks plus. http://www.easynn.com
SwingNN. Forecast with Neural Networks. http://www.swingnn.com
JustNN. Just Neural Networks. http://www.justnn.com
Industrial One
Jun 6, 2012, 1:20:07 PM6/6/12
to
On May 26, 10:38 am, Johny Mannings <johny.manni...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several
> manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market
> determines a fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly
> high profit margins over 80%, they simply force their customers to
> buy it, they kill off any competition. Communism means everything
> belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft
> (they even own the president), so Microsoft is far more likely like
> communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any unknowing naive
> programmer facing an evil never seen in the software industry before.
>
> Believe me,...
Actually, that is the perfect example of free market capitalism.
> Microsoft is not an example of capitalism. In capitalism several
> manufacturers or producers offer their products, the market
> determines a fair price. Compare this to Microsoft's exorbitantly
> high profit margins over 80%, they simply force their customers to
> buy it, they kill off any competition. Communism means everything
> belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft
> (they even own the president), so Microsoft is far more likely like
> communism in its worst form, a nightmare for any unknowing naive
> programmer facing an evil never seen in the software industry before.
>
> Believe me,...
Who granted Microsoft those high profit margins, sir? Government
regulation? Hahahaha.
Bill Gates acquired and acquired until he got a monopoly and then
cornered the market and eliminated the competition so he could acquire
some more, and more.
"The greatest enemy to Capitalism is the Capitalist. The individual
goals of the Capitalists? are not the same as the ideological goals of
Capitalism. One goal of capitalism is to strengthen the economy
through competition which keeps prices low. The goal of the
capitalists is to corner markets, eliminate competition and
monopolize. Another goal of Capitalism is improvement of society
through innovation but the goal of the Capitalists is to maximize
profit even at the expense of society."
Please fail to be a fucking moron, esteemed spammer.
> Communism means everything
> belongs to the state, in this case everything belongs to Microsoft
thinking of an oligarchy, like Great Britain and the beautiful
capitalist free America where the Rockefellers, Morgans and Warburgs
(all descendants of royal families from the former French, Austro-
Hungarian and British empires) control the currency, and pretty much
everything.
I realize this propaganda article is aimed at your average idiot,
incestual American, but we're entering a turning point where most
people are ceasing to believe in billionaire fairies, no matter how
much Bill Gates is attempting to be a poster boy for one. So drop the
1940s Red-Scare bullshit.
repeatable_...@yahoo.com
Jun 15, 2012, 6:49:22 AM6/15/12
to
Gosh!, I'm so glad I found out before I signed my two hundred page
contract Bill dropped off yesterday when he came to visit.
Seriously folks, yes, MS is a company that has prospered using illegal
and unethical business practices (consider just one example of many,
and since this is a compression related website, I'll use the Stack
Electronics debacle.)
You know much more than the money they prevented SE from making, they
stole the fun from the folks behind SE.
contract Bill dropped off yesterday when he came to visit.
Seriously folks, yes, MS is a company that has prospered using illegal
and unethical business practices (consider just one example of many,
and since this is a compression related website, I'll use the Stack
Electronics debacle.)
You know much more than the money they prevented SE from making, they
stole the fun from the folks behind SE.
repeatable_...@yahoo.com
Jun 15, 2012, 7:24:16 AM6/15/12
to
in the newspaper. But if I could really know the why of something,
I'd like to know why the judge in the 2005 MS anti-trust case allowed
BG to walk when he feigned memory loss.
Any other person attempting to fake such selective memory loss would
have been given the opportunity to rest and relax, to see if such
circumstances, away from the distractions of business and family,
might have improved his failing memory. (Yes I mean they'd be thrown
in the slammer!)
And that judge didn't like Mr. Gates did, yet he didn't act. Why? I
don't blame the judge, what I'd like to know is: What pressure was
applied?, because it's obvious that some external influence was
successfully applied.
Industrial One
Jun 16, 2012, 2:35:26 AM6/16/12
to
The Judge did not let MS walk. In fact, they've been found guilty of aforementioned unethical business practices. But when Bush got elected, shit started to hit the fan and MS wriggled off the hook when the case ended in 2007.
Does my memory serve me right if I say I recall you voicing support for that Nazi, redneck cumbucket Bush?
You're a joke, Jules.
michael....@gmail.com
Sep 28, 2012, 2:01:31 PM9/28/12
to
On Saturday, May 26, 2012 3:38:21 AM UTC-7, Johny Mannings wrote:
> The secret of Microsoft's success.
>
> And Microsoft kept on stealing technology. Visicalc became Microsoft
> The secret of Microsoft's success.
>
> Excel. Borland became Microsoft Developer Studio, Wordstar became
> Microsoft word. Netscape became Internet Explorer. 3dFx became
> Microsoft directX,
Yeah, yeah, I know YHBT, don't feed, blah blah, however the above is completely inaccurate.
> Microsoft directX,
Internet Explorer was an extension of the NCSA Mosaic web browser. It was distributed under a licensing agreement with Spyglass, Inc.
In Feb. 1995 Microsoft bought RenderMorphics; *that* product Reality Lab, a real-time software-rendering library, had an API that became the DirectX API, NOT 3Dfx.
3Dfx was founded in 1994; 3dfx released its Voodoo Graphics chip in 1996.
While Excel implemented the exact same functionality as VisiCalc it used NONE of the VisaCalc source code. It is not illegal to re-implement and clone existing functionality IF you write the entire source code yourself. See GNU for numerous examples.
References:
ftp://ftp.microsoft.com/peropsys/win_news/News%26Events/WinNews/vol%202%20%23%203.txt
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reality_Lab
http://www.qubesoft.com/index.php?main=overview.html
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/3dfx_Interactive
An actually *researched* version of the above rant can be read at:
http://www.dwheeler.com/innovation/microsoft.html
0 new messages