Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug

1 view
Skip to first unread message

beheiger

unread,
Mar 5, 2008, 12:16:00 PM3/5/08
to
Hi,

the following, definitely "minimal" program causes a violent crash of
lcc-win32,
at least on my machine:

///////////////////////////////////////////
void main(void){

};

Regards,

Andy


jacob navia

unread,
Mar 5, 2008, 4:11:49 PM3/5/08
to

1)

The prototype for main is

int main(void)
{
}

The crash was fixed several months ago.


--
jacob navia
jacob at jacob point remcomp point fr
logiciels/informatique
http://www.cs.virginia.edu/~lcc-win32

Karl Heinze

unread,
Mar 10, 2008, 6:14:28 AM3/10/08
to
On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:11:49 +0100, jacob navia <ja...@nospam.com>
wrote:

>
> The crash was fixed several months ago.
>

So whyis it still in the present version of lcc-win32?


K. H.

--

E-mail: info<at>simple-line<Punkt>de

Friedrich Dominicus

unread,
Mar 10, 2008, 7:03:13 AM3/10/08
to
Karl Heinze <nomail@invalid> writes:

> On Wed, 05 Mar 2008 22:11:49 +0100, jacob navia <ja...@nospam.com>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> The crash was fixed several months ago.
>>
> So whyis it still in the present version of lcc-win32?

can not see it:

#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>

void main(void){
return;
}

Output:
void_main exe built successfully

And runs also
Regards
Friedrich

--
Please remove just-for-news- to reply via e-mail.

Karl Heinze

unread,
Mar 10, 2008, 11:09:43 AM3/10/08
to
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 12:03:13 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus
<just-for-...@q-software-solutions.de> wrote:

>>>
>>> The crash was fixed several months ago.
>>>

>> So why is it still in the present version of lcc-win32?


>> can not see it:
>>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
> void main(void){
> return;
> }
>
> Output:
> void_main exe built successfully
>

> And runs also.
>
Not for me. Windows 2000 SP4 (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core)

Crash while trying to comppile.

Message-Box:

lcc.exe - Fehler in Anwendung

Die Anweisung in "0x778cc00a" verweist auf Seicher in "0xfffffff8".
Der Vorgang "read" konnte nicht auf dem Speicher durchgeführt
werden.

Klicken Sie auf "OK", um das Programm zu beenden.

Friedrich Dominicus

unread,
Mar 11, 2008, 2:35:18 AM3/11/08
to
Karl Heinze <nomail@invalid> writes:

>>
> Not for me. Windows 2000 SP4 (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core)
>
> Crash while trying to comppile.
>
> Message-Box:
>
> lcc.exe - Fehler in Anwendung
>
> Die Anweisung in "0x778cc00a" verweist auf Seicher in "0xfffffff8".
> Der Vorgang "read" konnte nicht auf dem Speicher durchgeführt
> werden.
>
> Klicken Sie auf "OK", um das Programm zu beenden.

Well then the best to do is filing a bug report. I'd have to install w
windows 2000 to see what'll happen

Karl Heinze

unread,
Mar 11, 2008, 6:38:35 AM3/11/08
to
On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:35:18 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus
<just-for-...@q-software-solutions.de> wrote:

"the following, definitely "minimal" program causes a violent crash of

lcc-win32, at least on my machine ..."

Same on my machine: Windows 2000 SP4 (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core, 2GB).

>
> Well then the best to do is filing a bug report. I'd have to install

> Windows 2000 to see what'll happen.
>
Well, I guess Windows 2000 is more and more becoming a non issue.
Actually I will switch to Windows XP in the near future. (On the other
hand, the bug _is there_ it seems; after all it was confirmed by at
least one independent tester - me.)

CBFalconer

unread,
Mar 11, 2008, 6:45:54 PM3/11/08
to
Karl Heinze wrote:
> Friedrich Dominicus <just-for-...@q-software-solutions.de> wrote:
>
... snip ...

>
>> Well then the best to do is filing a bug report. I'd have to
>> install Windows 2000 to see what'll happen.
>
> Well, I guess Windows 2000 is more and more becoming a non issue.
> Actually I will switch to Windows XP in the near future. (On the
> other hand, the bug _is there_ it seems; after all it was
> confirmed by at least one independent tester - me.)

Don't switch. 2000 avoids much of the XP nonsense, and has a
better EULA. Vista is totally impossible.

--
[mail]: Chuck F (cbfalconer at maineline dot net)
[page]: <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>
Try the download section.

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Friedrich Dominicus

unread,
Mar 14, 2008, 2:48:26 AM3/14/08
to
Karl Heinze <nomail@invalid> writes:

> On Tue, 11 Mar 2008 07:35:18 +0100, Friedrich Dominicus
> <just-for-...@q-software-solutions.de> wrote:
>
> "the following, definitely "minimal" program causes a violent crash of
> lcc-win32, at least on my machine ..."
>
> Same on my machine: Windows 2000 SP4 (AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core, 2GB).
>
>>
>> Well then the best to do is filing a bug report. I'd have to install
>> Windows 2000 to see what'll happen.

Ok, I've installed a windows 2000 with SP4 then I opened the project
with the void main typed F9 and .... it simply runs. I can not confirm
this bug.

My lcc version is from the
2008-02-16

0 new messages