I don't see why a smaller L2 cache could cause AutoCAD problems, but I
don't want to take the chance.
Thanks,
-jb
--
-------------------------------
#include "StandardDisclaimer.h"
Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.
We have 2 A2k stations using Celeron 400's with 64mb ram. They both behave
themselves. They have acceptable speed for basic drawing.
Boyd
jBeach wrote:
>
> I've heard rumors that Intel's Celeron chips are unsuitable for
> AutoCAD. We are strictly running AutoCAD r14 and 2000.
>
> I don't see why a smaller L2 cache could cause AutoCAD problems, but I
> don't want to take the chance.
>
> Thanks,
>
> -jb
>
> --
> -------------------------------
> #include "StandardDisclaimer.h"
>
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.
--
******************************************
* Tom Berger
* ber...@architektur.uni-kassel.de
* Universität Gh Kassel
* FB Architektur - Entwerfen + CAD
******************************************
* Architekturbemaßung für AutoCAD:
* http://www.archtools.de
******************************************
No spam, remove the 2 Q's in the e-mail address.
__________________________________________________
90% of being smart is knowing what you're dumb at.
There is no reason that they shouldn't work, if a little slower.
--
-Dave /;^{D>
(Warning: Reply-to address has been changed - Death To Spam!)
Boyd Woodorth <woodorth...@NOSPAMbhp.com.au> wrote in message
news:8eni9i$m78$1...@gossamer.itmel.bhp.com.au...
>
> jBeach <ja_b...@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:8enbqu$q10$1...@nnrp1.deja.com...
> > I've heard rumors that Intel's Celeron chips are unsuitable for
> > AutoCAD. We are strictly running AutoCAD r14 and 2000.
> >
> > I don't see why a smaller L2 cache could cause AutoCAD problems, but I
> > don't want to take the chance.
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -jb
> >
> > --
> > -------------------------------
> > #include "StandardDisclaimer.h"
> >
> >
> > Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> > Before you buy.
>
>
> Celerons are a little slower than equivalent Pentium-2, but some of my
> cow-workers are "Celerons" themselves.... *grin*
-Dave /;^{D>
Sheessh.......great work mate you are Dave. I hope your cow-workers (mooo)
don't read the cad newsgroups.
BTW.....I've been wondering what the / part of your sig. means. Do you part
your hair on the right or have a sloping flat head? (no offence intended)
Cam......(greying head)
>Celerons are a little slower than equivalent Pentium-2, but some of my
>cow-workers are "Celerons" themselves.... *grin*
"Cow-workers"? (grin)
David - do you have any experience or info regarding the Athlon
processor?
No first or even second hand tests yet - and you can find good and bad
reviews all over the net.
But I'm running a 700 MHz P-III, with 256M RAM, if anyone wants to do some
benchmarking.
-Dave /;^{D>
(Warning: Reply-to address has been changed - Death To Spam!)
Dennis Shinn <c...@anatechsys.com> wrote in message
news:391118e5....@brokaw.wa.com...
Most of my cow-workers don't even know what they are - and would only be
interested in the ones that start with alt.binaries.pictures.erotica......
>
> BTW.....I've been wondering what the / part of your sig. means. Do you
part
> your hair on the right or have a sloping flat head? (no offence intended)
>
> Cam......(greying head)
>
I used to use B^{D>
B Glasses
^ Pointed Nose (I'm used to it)
{ Mustache
D Big Grin (usually)
> Goatee
But then I got contacts - and the winking eyes looked lonely, so I added the
hair.
--
This is not quite what you asked, but take a look here
http://www.motherboards.org/reviews/ep7kxa.html
This motherboard plus Athlon 800 *smoked* the opposition in a recent test
locally.
>This motherboard plus Athlon 800 *smoked* the opposition in a recent test
>locally.
Thanks, Cam. The reson I'm interested is I just purchased a new Athlon
based system. Kinda after the fact I realize but all one persons I
researched the issue with assured me it was a wise choice. Of course
the fact that that one person is the person that sold me the machine
gives pause. (g)
Should be here sometime next week so I might take David up on the
benchmark comparisons.
Paul "nothing useful here, move along" Bowers
Cam Jackson wrote:
>
> > Celerons are a little slower than equivalent Pentium-2, but some of my
> > cow-workers are "Celerons" themselves.... *grin*
>
> -Dave /;^{D>
>
> Sheessh.......great work mate you are Dave. I hope your cow-workers (mooo)
> don't read the cad newsgroups.
>
I got it from DNRC - and I claim all of you inDUHviduals as my personal
servants!
--
-Dave /;^{D>
(Warning: Reply-to address has been changed - Death To Spam!)
Paul Bowers <pbo...@PipingDesign.com> wrote in message
news:391387FF...@PipingDesign.com...
--
-Dave /;^{D>
(Warning: Reply-to address has been changed - Death To Spam!)
Dennis Shinn <c...@anatechsys.com> wrote in message
news:3912d974....@brokaw.wa.com...