Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bulldozer

3 views
Skip to first unread message

EACA

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 1:35:56 AM11/19/09
to
Hi Andy:

I wonder if it's possible for you to explain why AMD's engineers think
that Bulldozer is not that great of a processor (according to a
previous post from you)?

Thanks in advancecfor any answer.

Noob

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 4:37:19 AM11/19/09
to
EACA wrote:

> I wonder if it's possible for you to explain why AMD's engineers
> think that Bulldozer is not that great of a processor (according
> to a previous post from you)?

Then why don't you reply to that specific post, in the context of
that specific thread, addressing specific claims?

nm...@cam.ac.uk

unread,
Nov 19, 2009, 5:01:16 AM11/19/09
to
In article <83a4ea7c-f04c-40f8...@z7g2000vbl.googlegroups.com>,

EACA <eat...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>I wonder if it's possible for you to explain why AMD's engineers think
>that Bulldozer is not that great of a processor (according to a
>previous post from you)?

Well, I can answer for myself and a colleague. Our reaction was
"fine, but the real bottlenecks are in the memory access".


Regards,
Nick Maclaren.

0 new messages