Google Groups no longer supports new usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Why are headhunters overwhelmingly idiots?

33 views
Skip to the first unread message

Neil Bradley

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 02:15:1011/04/2005
to
I posted my resume on Monster.com back in December when I was laid off. I got
flooded by calls from various headhunters, but one occured last week that really
put a bad taste in my mouth when it comes to headhunters. It went something like
this:

Me : Hello?
Him: Can I speak to Mr. Bradley?
Me : Yes, that's me.
Him: Hi, I'm xxxxx from yyyy and I saw your resume on monster.com. We have an
embedded job that match your skill set. Does this sound interesting?
Me : Sure. What is the product and what type of work is it?
Him: It's an embedded Java job.
Me : Oh, I don't know/do Java.
Him: But it's an embedded job.
Me : But you also said it's Java work.
Him: Yes, but if you know embedded, you can do Java.
Me : Um... no, Java is a lanaguage, embedded is completely different.
Him: No, if you know embedded you know Java.
Me : Trust me on this one - Java is a language they're using in an embedded
system. I have plenty of embedded systems experience, just not doing anything
with Java.
Him: Then why did you say you did embedded work on your resume?
Me : Because I've done 8051, ARM, AVR, PowerPC, and Intel based processor
embedded designs in my history, including hardware and firmware.
Him: So.... then you know Java.
Me : No, I don't know Java. Java is a language. Java CAN be used in an embedded
system, but more often it's straight C or assembly language instead.
Him: You can't know embedded without knowing Java.
Me : Are you actually serious?
Him: Yes - Java is a prerequisite for embedded in this job.
Me : Maybe for that job, but not generally - that's why I didn't list it on my
resume!
Him: But on your resume you shouldn't say you know embedded if you don't know Java.
Me : (getting really irritated at this point) It's clear from my talking with
you that you have NO CLUE what you're talking about, and I wouldn't consider
working for you or any client stupid enough to hire you. Goodbye!

I've gotten other really bizzare calls, too - one who couldn't get it through
her head that I didn't want to move 120 miles away no matter how many times I
told her, nor matter how much she increaesd the pay.

This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this retarded?

-->Neil

Gary...@aol.com

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 05:18:3911/04/2005
to
Not all. I haven't met that many who insisted on flaunting their
ignorance. The smart ones will learn from you. But then, when I'm
usually out of work, so are a ton of other programmers and I seldom get
such calls. I wonder if there's a website to showcase such experiences.
You see a lot of "Do's and Don'ts of Interviews", maybe there should be
a "Dos and Don'ts for headhunters".

Message has been deleted

Paul Carpenter

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 04:08:1511/04/2005
to
On Sunday, in article <115k5f5...@corp.supernews.com>
nb_no...@synthcom.com "Neil Bradley" wrote:

>I posted my resume on Monster.com back in December when I was laid off. I got
>flooded by calls from various headhunters, but one occured last week that
> really
>put a bad taste in my mouth when it comes to headhunters. It went something
> like
>this:
>

...


>Him: Hi, I'm xxxxx from yyyy and I saw your resume on monster.com. We have an
>embedded job that match your skill set. Does this sound interesting?
>Me : Sure. What is the product and what type of work is it?
>Him: It's an embedded Java job.
>Me : Oh, I don't know/do Java.

...


>I've gotten other really bizzare calls, too - one who couldn't get it through
>her head that I didn't want to move 120 miles away no matter how many times I
>told her, nor matter how much she increaesd the pay.
>
>This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this retarded?

Quite a lot of headhunters/recruitment 'consultants' (in UK) are just
glorified insurance/snake oil sales people with the so called ability to
matchthings up. Often some companies have targets to meet so do simple
word searches and never read the resume/CV.

I have in the past had problems with "VME bus" and "VME Operating System",
those who know the later will know that it is rarely considered an embedded
system let alone a small system!

Personally I think resumes/CVs should be distributed as image files, with
sufficient added noise to the image to make OCR very difficult. To force
reading and stop word searches and changing of the documents to send to
potential clients/employers.

--
Paul Carpenter | pa...@pcserviceselectronics.co.uk
<http://www.pcserviceselectronics.co.uk/> PC Services
<http://www.gnuh8.org.uk/> GNU H8 & mailing list info
<http://www.badweb.org.uk/> For those web sites you hate

Grant Edwards

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 09:36:5811/04/2005
to
On 2005-04-11, Neil Bradley <nb_no...@synthcom.com> wrote:

> This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all
> this retarded?

Not all, but a lot of them are. There's a very high turnover
rate, and most of them only last a few months. They typically
have no training or experience in either HR or the field for
which they're recruiting.

Most are just sales people making cold calls with a script in
hand.

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! I'm sitting on my
at SPEED QUEEN... To me,
visi.com it's ENJOYABLE... I'm
WARM... I'm VIBRATORY...

Michael

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 10:15:4711/04/2005
to


Too many are, in my experience.
My pet peeve was being asked to "tweek" my resume for each and every prospective
employer. After doing that twice I refused all further such requests. I was an
Assurance engineer who specialized in the IBM S/370 "channel"; any prospective
employer who doesn't understand that short and to-the-point job descripton
doesn't need my skills.

Ian Bell

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 11:54:1011/04/2005
to
Neil Bradley wrote:

>
> This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this retarded?
>
>

No, most of them are *much* worse.

IAn

--
Ian Bell

Jim Stewart

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 12:27:5611/04/2005
to
Grant Edwards wrote:

> On 2005-04-11, Neil Bradley <nb_no...@synthcom.com> wrote:
>
>
>>This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all
>>this retarded?
>
>
> Not all, but a lot of them are. There's a very high turnover
> rate, and most of them only last a few months. They typically
> have no training or experience in either HR or the field for
> which they're recruiting.

Which begs the question "are there headhunters
for headhunters?"

Grant Edwards

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 13:19:3411/04/2005
to
On 2005-04-11, Jim Stewart <jste...@jkmicro.com> wrote:

>>>This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all
>>>this retarded?
>>
>> Not all, but a lot of them are. There's a very high turnover
>> rate, and most of them only last a few months. They typically
>> have no training or experience in either HR or the field for
>> which they're recruiting.
>
> Which begs the question "are there headhunters
> for headhunters?"

Not that I know of. The ones I knew started out as HR
recruiters or they just answered an ad in the paper and went to
work for a sweatshop type operation.

<pet peeve>
"begs the question" refers to making an argument containing the
logical fallacy in which the argument assumes as a premise the
result being proved. It's pretty much the same as a circular
argument.
</pet peeve>

--
Grant Edwards grante Yow! Make me look like
at LINDA RONSTADT again!!
visi.com

Everett M. Greene

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 14:24:0511/04/2005
to
Grant Edwards <gra...@visi.com> writes:
> On 2005-04-11, Neil Bradley <nb_no...@synthcom.com> wrote:
>
> > This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all
> > this retarded?
>
> Not all, but a lot of them are. There's a very high turnover
> rate, and most of them only last a few months. They typically
> have no training or experience in either HR or the field for
> which they're recruiting.
>
> Most are just sales people making cold calls with a script in
> hand.

I was contacted by a recruiter for a job that sounded
interesting but the job description/location/etc. was
somewhat vague and I wanted some questions answered.
When I got the guy on the phone after not being able
to get any answers via email, he said that he makes
$200/hour and doesn't have time to answer questions!

Paul E. Bennett

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 13:57:2111/04/2005
to
Neil Bradley wrote:

> I posted my resume on Monster.com back in December when I was laid off. I
> got flooded by calls from various headhunters, but one occured last week
> that really put a bad taste in my mouth when it comes to headhunters. It
> went something like this:

[%X]

> I've gotten other really bizzare calls, too - one who couldn't get it
> through her head that I didn't want to move 120 miles away no matter how
> many times I told her, nor matter how much she increaesd the pay.
>
> This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this retarded?

Of the order of 90% are probably retarded to this sort of degree. Of the
remaining 10% half will be quite decent worthwhile companies that will be
quite clued up on the positions they are offering. The trick is finding
those few.

I don't know any US ones but I do know some good UK ones.

--
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett ....................<email://p...@amleth.demon.co.uk>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy .....<http://www.amleth.demon.co.uk/>
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-811095
Going Forth Safely ....EBA. http://www.electric-boat-association.org.uk/
********************************************************************

Guy Macon

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 14:02:4411/04/2005
to


Jim Stewart wrote:

>Which begs the question "are there headhunters
>for headhunters?"

No. Headhunters are for hard-to-fill positions.
Nobody is going to pay that extra expense for a
position where a newspaper ad gets them more
applicants than they can handle.


CBFalconer

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 11:24:2911/04/2005
to
Michael wrote:
> Neil Bradley wrote:
>>
... snip ...

>>
>> This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this
>> retarded?
>
> Too many are, in my experience.
> My pet peeve was being asked to "tweek" my resume for each and
> every prospective employer. After doing that twice I refused all
> further such requests. I was an Assurance engineer who specialized
> in the IBM S/370 "channel"; any prospective employer who doesn't
> understand that short and to-the-point job descripton doesn't need
> my skills.

I assume you are restricting your job search to firms that want an
"Assurance engineer specializing in the IBM S/370 channel" and that
you have no interest in any other type of position. If this is
correct your attitude makes sense. Good luck, you will need it.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson


Norm Dresner

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 15:15:2111/04/2005
to
If they know anything about programming they wouldn't be headhunting
programmers but they'd get their own programming job!

Norm

Dr Justice

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 15:49:2711/04/2005
to
"Neil Bradley" <nb_no...@synthcom.com> wrote in message
news:115k5f5...@corp.supernews.com...

> This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this retarded?

The short and irresponsible answer: yes.

In my experience HH firms are generally manned by failed salesemen and
managers. One bad thing is that they are messing up the job market by their
sheer ignorance, but worse is the effect that they create a barrier between
employer and employees. A barrier that wasn't there afew years ago when
real people actually spoke directly togehter about the real issues.

HH ads that I see all to often goes almost like this:
"Engineer wanted for company."
The people that puts up ads like that probably know little more than what is
literally stated. IMO that's an insult to both the anonymous company and the
potential employee.

Another strange thing is that many firms seemingly care more for exposing
you to (bogus) "personality tests", than examining your professional
ability. How low can you go?

There may be competent HH firms out there, that does something more than
leeching. I hope to make such an observation one day, but maybe I'll be
better off looking for Dodos :-D

DJ
--


bit eimer

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 16:55:2111/04/2005
to

"Dr Justice" <so...@no.spam.wanted> wrote in message
news:zxA6e.734$184.472@amstwist00...

<snip>

> HH ads that I see all to often goes almost like this:
> "Engineer wanted for company."

Yeah, that's how it always starts out. They may SAY they just want some
company, but they want a lot more!

But before you know it, you're holding hands, then engaged, then married
with 2 kids...

Give 'em inch, they'll take a mile.


<grin>
--
...The Bit Eimer NAR 84054 L1
"My goal in life is to be the kind of person my cat thinks he is"
[remove keinewurst and reverse letters in domain to email me]
--------------------------------------------------------------


Mark McDougall

unread,
11 Apr 2005, 21:30:5911/04/2005
to
Here's one for you...

A while back I was contracting and was contacted by a head hunter about
a job "involving linux running on a proprietory platform". She couldn't
tell me much more about it but set me up with an "interview" with the
client the following day.

I turn up, and they tell me that they'd like to be able to run linux on
their hardware (I can't recall which processor it was, but Linux already
ran on that processor). I told them that I've never actually
bootstrapped Linux on another platform but couldn't see why it wouldn't
be possible, and that I can look into it. With that they nodded and
walked away.

So here I am, sitting at the desk, thinking they'll return in a few
minutes. I think nothing of it and start to look into things, read doco,
source etc. Before I know it, it's lunchtime and they're inviting me out
to lunch. We return to the office, they ask how I'm going, and I say
that I'm confident it's do-able (they had a 4 week schedule). Again they
leave me to it. By about 3pm I'm starting to think they're milking some
free advice so I get up and try to find someone (the office is almost
empty). After a quick chat I realise that they're under the impression
that this is no interview at all - and that I've actually *started*
working for them!!!

I go downstairs, ring the HH to find out WTF is going on and she swears
it was supposed to be an interview! I leave the matter with her to sort
out and head home.

[At the risk of being labelled a sexist pig, I actually met this HH a
few years beforehand and her only saving grace was the fact that she
was, quite simply, stunning! ;)]

As luck would have it, that same afternoon I get a call about another
(longer term) contract with former colleagues and I could tell the HH
"thanks, but no thanks". They obviously had a lot of trouble trying to
find someone to do the job because she begged me to reconsider and
offered me more money just to stay for a few days until she found
someone else!

Regards,
Mark

Bryan Hackney

unread,
12 Apr 2005, 01:09:5812/04/2005
to
Mark McDougall wrote:
> Here's one for you...
>
[...]

> that I'm confident it's do-able (they had a 4 week schedule). Again they
> leave me to it. By about 3pm I'm starting to think they're milking some
> free advice so I get up and try to find someone (the office is almost
> empty). After a quick chat I realise that they're under the impression
> that this is no interview at all - and that I've actually *started*
> working for them!!!
>
> I go downstairs, ring the HH to find out WTF is going on and she swears
> it was supposed to be an interview! I leave the matter with her to sort
> out and head home.
>

If I had a file, this would go into it. You can't make this stuff up!


[...]

Dr Justice

unread,
12 Apr 2005, 08:38:3912/04/2005
to
"bit eimer" <bit_eimer....@ten.xoc> wrote in message
news:OuB6e.6690$EX4.1671@fed1read01...

>
> "Dr Justice" <so...@no.spam.wanted> wrote in message
> news:zxA6e.734$184.472@amstwist00...
[snip]
>
> > HH ads that I see all to often goes almost like this:
> > "Engineer wanted for company."
[snip]

> But before you know it, you're holding hands, then engaged, then married
> with 2 kids...
>
> Give 'em inch, they'll take a mile.

LOL - Undoubdedtly! :D

Heres an HH anecdote:

One time I had announced myself available and registered my CV.
The CV is the kind that a computer/embedded engineer has.
As it happens it has the word "development" in it. This led to
an HH contacting me, wanting me to start working in
a property broker firm doing "property development".
He was very insistent that I would be a good man for the job
with all my development experience...

DJ
--


Jet Morgan

unread,
19 Apr 2005, 06:41:0719/04/2005
to

"Ian Bell" <ruffr...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:d3e31g$9in$1...@slavica.ukpost.com...

> Neil Bradley wrote:
>
> >
> > This is my first experience with headhunters. Are they all this
retarded?
> >
> >
> No, most of them are *much* worse.

I must've been really lucky then. All my recent pimps have
perfectly well understood what "embedded" means, and how
my CV and potential jobs will relate to each other.

Richard [in PE12]


brybb03

unread,
11 Mar 2008, 15:34:3011/03/2008
to
I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread; however, I couldn't
resist responding. I want to be up front and let everyone know that I am
a recruiter. No, I am not trying to recruit anyone here. I just wanted
respond and actually give you some advice in finding the right recruiter.
Yes, many recruiters make us look bad because they don't have the technical
expertise in explaining the position, or asking the right questions (but
pretend that they know).
So in order to qualify the recruiter, ask them this:
What does industry is the company in? If you have automotive embedded
experience, it may not be enough for a wireless company.
Are you working with the hiring manager? Recruiters will only understand
the position if they are dealing with the boss. Don't even deal with
recruiters that have to go through HR. HR can be just as clueless.
And if they ask you to tweak your resume, forget it. The hiring manager/
director of engineering will know what to look for in a resume. True
embedded developers can see through the b.s. in a resume.
Recruiters cannot help an engineer with his/her resume. Period.
So don't fall for that trap.
Anyway, just my thoughts....

Mark McDougall

unread,
11 Mar 2008, 19:58:0411/03/2008
to
I've heard...

"If you can't do it - teach it!
If you can't teach - consult!"

I guess taking that one step further...

"If you can't consult - recruit?"

Regards,

--
Mark McDougall, Engineer
Virtual Logic Pty Ltd, <http://www.vl.com.au>
21-25 King St, Rockdale, 2216
Ph: +612-9599-3255 Fax: +612-9599-3266

Everett M. Greene

unread,
12 Mar 2008, 15:37:2212/03/2008
to
"brybb03" <emsa...@yahoo.com> writes:
> I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread; however, I couldn't
> resist responding. I want to be up front and let everyone know that I am
> a recruiter. No, I am not trying to recruit anyone here. I just wanted
> respond and actually give you some advice in finding the right recruiter.
> Yes, many recruiters make us look bad because they don't have the technical
> expertise in explaining the position, or asking the right questions (but
> pretend that they know).

Then there's the recruiter I encountered who said he was
paid so much money to do recruiting that he couldn't be
bothered to discuss the jobs for which he was recruiting.

CBFalconer

unread,
11 Mar 2008, 16:06:2911/03/2008
to
brybb03 wrote:
>
> I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread; however, I
> couldn't resist responding. ...

Please do not top-post. Your answer belongs after (or intermixed
with) the quoted material to which you reply, after snipping all
irrelevant material. See the following links:

--
<http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html>
<http://www.caliburn.nl/topposting.html>
<http://www.netmeister.org/news/learn2quote.html>
<http://cfaj.freeshell.org/google/> (taming google)
<http://members.fortunecity.com/nnqweb/> (newusers)

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

Robert Adsett

unread,
11 Mar 2008, 21:03:3011/03/2008
to
In article <taadnTGs5-NbQ0va...@giganews.com>, brybb03
says...

> I don't know if anyone is still reading this thread; however, I couldn't
> resist responding. I want to be up front and let everyone know that I am
> a recruiter. No, I am not trying to recruit anyone here. I just wanted
> respond and actually give you some advice in finding the right recruiter.
> Yes, many recruiters make us look bad because they don't have the technical
> expertise in explaining the position, or asking the right questions (but
> pretend that they know).
> So in order to qualify the recruiter, ask them this:
> What does industry is the company in?

The idea being that if they can actually parse that question they should
be eliminated from consideration? ;)

Robert

Moon Shine

unread,
13 Mar 2008, 20:30:2113/03/2008
to

"Robert Adsett" <su...@aeolusdevelopment.com> wrote in message
news:MPG.2240f5ea1...@free.teranews.com...

Why are headhunters idiots?
Because there are zero requirements to become a headhunter
other than wanting obscene fees for a few minutes on the phone.

Why are they hated?
Because they are typically sleazy as a used car salesman,
an un-needed middleman, a parasite.


AZ Nomad

unread,
13 Mar 2008, 22:07:4413/03/2008
to


They are no different than the HR department of any company. Think
of them as outsourced HR.

Mark McDougall

unread,
13 Mar 2008, 23:05:0113/03/2008
to
AZ Nomad wrote:

> They are no different than the HR department of any company. Think
> of them as outsourced HR.

Which is exactly what Moon Shine just said!

Guy Macon

unread,
13 Mar 2008, 23:37:0113/03/2008
to


AZ Nomad wrote:


>
>Moon Shine <4moon...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Why are headhunters idiots?
>>Because there are zero requirements to become a headhunter
>>other than wanting obscene fees for a few minutes on the phone.
>
>>Why are they hated?
>>Because they are typically sleazy as a used car salesman,
>>an un-needed middleman, a parasite.
>
>They are no different than the HR department of any company.
>Think of them as outsourced HR.

...without the longevity of HR employees. There is little
point in assisting a headhunter by, say, giving him a lead
in the hope that he may help you in the future. For him
there is no future; he will be gone in a few weeks.

AZ Nomad

unread,
14 Mar 2008, 08:41:5214/03/2008
to
On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 14:05:01 +1100, Mark McDougall <ma...@vl.com.au> wrote:
>AZ Nomad wrote:

>> They are no different than the HR department of any company. Think
>> of them as outsourced HR.

>Which is exactly what Moon Shine just said!

exactly not.

Mark McDougall

unread,
16 Mar 2008, 21:35:1716/03/2008
to
AZ Nomad wrote:

"Because there are zero requirements to become a headhunter


other than wanting obscene fees for a few minutes on the phone.

Because they are typically sleazy as a used car salesman,
an un-needed middleman, a parasite."

Reads like a dictionary entry for "HR" to me?!? :P

Rob Horton

unread,
17 Mar 2008, 07:33:0517/03/2008
to
> So in order to qualify the recruiter, ask them this:
> What does industry is the company in?

How about communicating in English? With this sort of rubbish, you only
make yourself appear to be an imbecile.

0 new messages