Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Question about PCB software (and making the boards at home)

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Gunnar

unread,
Apr 23, 2005, 12:36:54 PM4/23/05
to
Hi all,

I stumbled over an ad on www.circuitcellar.com about free PCB software
(http://www.pcb123.com/).
I would like to have some feedback about this software from anyone using it,
possibly comparing it to other PCB software out there.

My needs are simple, I am planning to build small projects for personal use.
On that note, how many of you are making your own boards at home? I used to
make boards 20-30 years ago, but at the time I used parts such as
transistors and TTL ICs. Now with surface mount ICs it is scary trying to
make boards...

My own thought is that it is better to have the boards made by a
professional outfit.

Thanks.

Gunnar.


Michael R. Kesti

unread,
Apr 23, 2005, 12:57:12 PM4/23/05
to
Gunnar wrote:

>Hi all,

Hey!

>I stumbled over an ad on www.circuitcellar.com about free PCB software
>(http://www.pcb123.com/).
>I would like to have some feedback about this software from anyone using it,
>possibly comparing it to other PCB software out there.

I've not used PCB123 but have used ExpressPCB (http://www.expresspcb.com/)
with success and satisfaction.

>My needs are simple, I am planning to build small projects for personal use.
>On that note, how many of you are making your own boards at home? I used to
>make boards 20-30 years ago, but at the time I used parts such as
>transistors and TTL ICs. Now with surface mount ICs it is scary trying to
>make boards...
>
>My own thought is that it is better to have the boards made by a
>professional outfit.

I agree, and it's so much easier to let them deal with the ugly details of
board production. Just not having to deal with spent echant disposal makes
it worth the price!

>Thanks.

Yer welcome.

--
========================================================================
Michael Kesti | "And like, one and one don't make
| two, one and one make one."
mke...@gv.net | - The Who, Bargain

Michael R. Kesti

unread,
Apr 23, 2005, 1:04:06 PM4/23/05
to
"Michael R. Kesti" wrote:


>I've not used PCB123 but have used ExpressPCB (http://www.expresspcb.com/)
>with success and satisfaction.

I meant to add this link to an 8051-based MIDI Timecode display I did
using ExpressPCB's software and services.

http://www.gv.net/~mkesti/MTCdisplay/

Paul E. Bennett

unread,
Apr 23, 2005, 1:15:53 PM4/23/05
to
Gunnar wrote:

I agree that getting a professional board fabrication outfit to build the
board is often better than doing it yourself. Unless you have plenty of
time and the right equipment at home you will find that the cost of doing
the board building can often be met by some more overtime at your normal
day job.

As for decent CAD tools then I suggest looking at:-

<http://www.vutrax.co.uk/>

They apparently do a Linux version as well as a Windows version. There is a
free download that you can use for small projects. If you need a bigger
board capability then you can buy the extra capacity.

--
********************************************************************
Paul E. Bennett ....................<email://p...@amleth.demon.co.uk>
Forth based HIDECS Consultancy .....<http://www.amleth.demon.co.uk/>
Mob: +44 (0)7811-639972
Tel: +44 (0)1235-811095
Going Forth Safely ....EBA. http://www.electric-boat-association.org.uk/
********************************************************************

Markus Zingg

unread,
Apr 23, 2005, 4:18:17 PM4/23/05
to

Gunnar

I can't comment on the free PCB software you mentioned, but some words
about home PCB production:

- SMD does not complicate things. In fact it's making things often
easier.

- Making your own boards is having a lot of advantages, but the degree
of the advantage may vary greatöy on where you are located etc. I.e.
where I live, "in country" made PCB's are horribly expensive and
haveing them made at cheaper locations add's a lot of aditional delay.

- You can do quite cool PCB's at home if you are dedicated. I.e. I'm
making my own though plated multi layer PCB's at home. See
www.myhome.ch/mzingg/pcbstuff/tps If you need ~50 PCBs/year, you will
end up with ~$10/board asuming we talk about four layers, 200 holes
and 4x4" size. To me, the biggest advantage is not necesarily cost
saving. It's the fact that you have the PCB in your hands just some
hours after you decided that you need one.

Just my 2¢ of course

Markus

PS: The home made ones are for prototyping and personal use only.
Production runs are always made in a boardhouse.

Mike Harrison

unread,
Apr 24, 2005, 9:42:15 AM4/24/05
to

If you have enough space to set up equipment permanently, and can live without through-plating,
homebrew PCBs can be fast and easy.
For lots of info on making good quality PCBs, see www.electricstuff.co.uk/pcbs.html

Gunnar

unread,
Apr 25, 2005, 12:00:27 AM4/25/05
to
Hi Mike,

good info! Thanks,

Gunnar,

"Mike Harrison" <mi...@whitewing.co.uk> wrote in message
news:3l8n619hsuvjrcp7e...@4ax.com...

Gunnar

unread,
Apr 25, 2005, 12:22:07 PM4/25/05
to
"Markus Zingg" <m.z...@nct.ch> wrote in message
news:uial61tq9a6s7clm5...@4ax.com...

> - You can do quite cool PCB's at home if you are dedicated. I.e. I'm
> making my own though plated multi layer PCB's at home. See
> www.myhome.ch/mzingg/pcbstuff/tps If you need ~50 PCBs/year, you will
> end up with ~$10/board asuming we talk about four layers, 200 holes
> and 4x4" size. To me, the biggest advantage is not necesarily cost
> saving. It's the fact that you have the PCB in your hands just some
> hours after you decided that you need one.

> Markus
>

Markus,

pretty cool!

It seems overkill for me though at the moment. Will keep a link to your site
though, one never knows when this might come in handy...

Gunnar

Gunnar

unread,
Apr 25, 2005, 12:24:21 PM4/25/05
to

"Paul E. Bennett" <p...@amleth.demon.co.uk> wrote in message
news:d4dvns$oso$1$8300...@news.demon.co.uk...
> Gunnar wrote:

[snip]

>
> As for decent CAD tools then I suggest looking at:-
>
> <http://www.vutrax.co.uk/>
>
> They apparently do a Linux version as well as a Windows version. There is
> a
> free download that you can use for small projects. If you need a bigger
> board capability then you can buy the extra capacity.
>

Thanks Paul.

Gunnar.


Gunnar

unread,
Apr 25, 2005, 12:25:45 PM4/25/05
to

"Michael R. Kesti" <mke...@gv.net> wrote in message
news:426A8006...@gv.net...

> "Michael R. Kesti" wrote:
>
>
>>I've not used PCB123 but have used ExpressPCB (http://www.expresspcb.com/)
>>with success and satisfaction.
>
> I meant to add this link to an 8051-based MIDI Timecode display I did
> using ExpressPCB's software and services.
>
> http://www.gv.net/~mkesti/MTCdisplay/
>

Thanks for the links Michael.

Gunnar.


Paul Marciano

unread,
Apr 25, 2005, 1:15:56 PM4/25/05
to

Gunnar wrote:
> Now with surface mount ICs it is scary trying to
> make boards...

I don't think boards are a problem - someone else mentioned
expresspcb.com, so that covers you for boards.

The trick with SMD is assembly. Thru-hole is easy, but DIP parts are
huge. To really make the most of the $51 boards from expresspcb (and
to use modern components) you can't help but use SMD.

But with SMD you need at least these two things over and above what you
normally stock in your lab:

+ A large magnifier (or microscope depending on your vision).
+ A toaster oven.


I like to hear people's experience with toaster ovens for SMD soldering
of QFPs and other ICs. There are various bits on the web about it, but
it's always good to hear the latest techniques.

Paul Burke

unread,
Apr 26, 2005, 3:27:22 AM4/26/05
to
Paul Marciano wrote:

> But with SMD you need at least these two things over and above what you
> normally stock in your lab:
>
> + A large magnifier (or microscope depending on your vision).
> + A toaster oven.
>
>
> I like to hear people's experience with toaster ovens for SMD soldering
> of QFPs and other ICs.

I do quite a lot of S&M prototyping, and I've never used either a large
magnifier nor a toaster oven (British toasters of the pop-up type are
deprecated anyway). I've not tried BGAs, nor QFPs above 200-odd pins,
but simple hand assembly works well up to that point. The Pace Wavetip
is useful, but an ordinary soldering iron (coarse tip- say 1.5mm) works
almost as well. As follows: Flux all over the pads and position the IC.
Use the fine tipped iron to tack the corner pins on (doesn't matter if
you blob a bit). Melt a bit of solder on the wavetip or coarse bit, then
draw it upside down along all the pins. Finally, clean up pins with
solder wick.

For resistors, SOTs etc. just tweezwers and solder by hand. It's quicker
than through hole.

As for the magnifier, I use a jewellers loop to inspect, but I'm
shortsighted enough that the whole thing is in focus 6" in front of my
nose, and with a good light, that works OK.

Paul Burke

CBFalconer

unread,
Apr 26, 2005, 11:45:02 AM4/26/05
to
Paul Burke wrote:
>
... snip ...

>
> I do quite a lot of S&M prototyping, and I've never used either a
> large magnifier nor a toaster oven (British toasters of the pop-up
> type are deprecated anyway). I've not tried BGAs, nor QFPs above
> 200-odd pins, but simple hand assembly works well up to that point.
> The Pace Wavetip is useful, but an ordinary soldering iron (coarse
> tip- say 1.5mm) works almost as well. As follows: Flux all over
> the pads and position the IC. Use the fine tipped iron to tack the
> corner pins on (doesn't matter if you blob a bit). Melt a bit of
> solder on the wavetip or coarse bit, then draw it upside down
> along all the pins. Finally, clean up pins with solder wick.

Just for contrast, I was taught to always have a solid mechanical
joint before soldering. We spent much time twisting leads with
long nosed pliers. Only the very sloppy used the solder as glue.
Hi-tech was a single sided PC board.

--
"If you want to post a followup via groups.google.com, don't use
the broken "Reply" link at the bottom of the article. Click on
"show options" at the top of the article, then click on the
"Reply" at the bottom of the article headers." - Keith Thompson


Paul Marciano

unread,
Apr 26, 2005, 1:52:39 PM4/26/05
to
Paul Burke wrote:
> I do quite a lot of S&M prototyping, and I've never used
> either a large magnifier nor a toaster oven (British
> toasters of the pop-up type are deprecated anyway).

Yeah, that's a good tip - don't use a pop-up toaster for SMD soldering.
I knew a guy once who tried that... didn't work... and the toast never
quite tasted right after that.

Really?

No, not really.

If you google toaster oven SMD you'll get some hits with photos of the
process. I must admit I haven't tried it myself, but it looks
fascinating. I gather there's a knack to it and it takes a few tries -
so it's best to have some sacrificial components.

One pin at a time is old-school (if there is such a thing when
discussing SMD), but if you have good eyes and a steady hand it's
doable, although you must take care not to overheat the leads.

A toaster oven, with the right thermal profile, can apparently do a
very good job and handle an entire board's worth of SMD parts in very
short time (although you still need to carefully inspect and fix
bridges, etc).

If I were doing a lot of SMD boards, I would at least give it a go.

Paul.

Paul Burke

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 3:11:34 AM4/27/05
to
Paul Marciano wrote:

> A toaster oven, with the right thermal profile, can apparently do a
> very good job and handle an entire board's worth of SMD parts in very
> short time (although you still need to carefully inspect and fix
> bridges, etc).

Presumably you have to screen the solder on first? Or paint it on with a
brush? Then place the components with a steady hand, making sure they
don't move between placing and heating.

No, I'll stick to my state-of-the-ark hand method for now.

Paul Burke

Paul Marciano

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 12:35:47 PM4/27/05
to

Here's the reference:
http://www.seattlerobotics.org/encoder/200006/oven_art.htm

As I said, I've never tried it myself, but it does look interesting.

Never hurts to try new things (except skydiving without a parachute).

Hershel Roberson

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 12:19:38 PM4/27/05
to

On 25-Apr-2005, "Paul Marciano" <pm...@yahoo.com> wrote:

> But with SMD you need at least these two things over and above what you
> normally stock in your lab:
>
> + A large magnifier (or microscope depending on your vision).
> + A toaster oven.
>
>
> I like to hear people's experience with toaster ovens for SMD soldering
> of QFPs and other ICs.

I've got a large magnifier and toaster oven, and they work quite well. I
will lay-out several different proto boards
on a panel, get a prototype stencil make for the panel, and go from there.
Once the panel has been assembled
and soldered, I cut the boards apart with a diamond blade on a table saw.
The prototype stencil costs $150 US.

I'ts not worth the trouble for a little board with a couple of dozen parts,
but you can save a ton of time as the parts
count goes up.

I've been doing 0.5MM pitch QFPs without too much trouble.

There is some useful information at http://www.stencilsunlimited.com/. I've
been buying my stencils here, and
the service is good.

As far as the magnifier, I bought a Vision Engineering "Mantis" off of ebay
a couple of years ago. Once you've had
one of these babies in your lab, you will find that you can't get by without
one. A 6X lens works well for me.

-Hershel Roberson

la...@larwe.com

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 1:08:23 PM4/27/05
to
> I like to hear people's experience with toaster ovens for SMD
soldering
> of QFPs and other ICs. There are various bits on the web about it,
but
> it's always good to hear the latest techniques.

It's superficially very easy, but the devil is in the details,
particularly if you are trying to achieve a zero rework rate. For
fine-pitch QFP, simply squeezing solder paste onto the pads,
hand-placing parts and dropping the PCB into a toaster oven gives what
I'd call "80/20 Pyrrhic results" - i.e. most of the time, 80% of the
joints are good, but fixing the remaining 20% takes as much time or
more as it would have to hand-solder the entire thing.

I'm working on a project (which I'll probably market as a kit) that
combines a non-contact temperature sensor with a simple PWM controller;
you hack it into a toaster oven to turn it into a reasonably controlled
reflow oven. It can handle the full preheat - reflow - cool temperature
profile.

There are a lot of engineering difficulties with this approach, though.
In the preheat phase, I've discovered you really want positive air
circulation. You absolutely don't want it during the reflow phase,
though, because components "sail" across the solder surface in those
air currents.

Jet Morgan

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 2:17:07 PM4/27/05
to
What is a toaster oven ?

Is it a thing for doing toast whilst keeping said toast
horizontal ? Is it like an ordinary oven grill with
heating elements top/bottom ?

Or is it a combined oven and toaster ?

Richard [in PE12]


la...@larwe.com

unread,
Apr 27, 2005, 2:50:50 PM4/27/05
to

Jet Morgan wrote:
> What is a toaster oven ?

Talkie's the name, toasting's the game. Anyone want any toast?

It's a small front-loading electric oven, typically about 45cm wide by
25cm tall by 25cm deep (interior cavity) with heating elements at top
and bottom. Cheap ones are under US$20 at department stores. Typically
used for heating a grilled cheese sandwich or a mini pizza or similar
fodder.

Paul Burke

unread,
Apr 28, 2005, 3:03:41 AM4/28/05
to
la...@larwe.com wrote:
>
>
> It's superficially very easy, but the devil is in the details,
> particularly if you are trying to achieve a zero rework rate. For
> fine-pitch QFP, simply squeezing solder paste onto the pads,
> hand-placing parts and dropping the PCB into a toaster oven gives what
> I'd call "80/20 Pyrrhic results" - i.e. most of the time, 80% of the
> joints are good, but fixing the remaining 20% takes as much time or
> more as it would have to hand-solder the entire thing.

That's as I expected. My own production boards are also hand assembled
(not by me), using a Wavetip for TQFPs, and I seldom get a failure. I
think it's a matter of process scale- just as you wouldn't attempt wave
soldering for through hole components at home (I bet someone has), hand
assembly suits small quantity production best. Now for those NGAs....

Paul Burke

Paul Burke

unread,
Apr 28, 2005, 3:05:39 AM4/28/05
to
Cultural differences- I haven't seen on over here- the sandwich toasters
we get here squeeze the stack between two shaped hot plates, rather like
a waffle maker. Not very good for PCBs.

Paul Burke

Robert Swindells

unread,
Apr 28, 2005, 4:13:05 AM4/28/05
to

We do have toaster ovens in Europe.

It is the kind of thing you might have in a bedsit, caravan or holiday
home.

The ones I found in a quick look on department store websites were a bit
more than US$20 though.

Robert Swindells


la...@larwe.com

unread,
Apr 28, 2005, 6:16:13 AM4/28/05
to

> >>What is a toaster oven ?
> >
> >
> > It's a small front-loading electric oven, typically about 45cm wide
by
> >
> Cultural differences- I haven't seen on over here- the sandwich
toasters
> we get here squeeze the stack between two shaped hot plates, rather
like
> a waffle maker. Not very good for PCBs.

We have those in the US too - they're simply called sandwich makers.
Back home in Oz we call those sorts of crushed sandwiches "jaffles"
(see for instance
http://www.kookaburragas.com.au/foodware_jaffleirons.htm which is the
old-fashioned manual style). Mmmm... a piping hot ham, cheese and
tomato jaffle on wholegrain bread with plenty of butter - oh boy,
SOOOOOOOOOOOOO tasty. Haven't had one in close to fifteen years.

CBFalconer

unread,
Apr 28, 2005, 8:02:25 AM4/28/05
to
la...@larwe.com wrote:
>
>>>>What is a toaster oven ?
>>>
>>> It's a small front-loading electric oven, typically about 45cm
>>
>> Cultural differences- I haven't seen on over here- the sandwich
>> toasters we get here squeeze the stack between two shaped hot
>> plates, rather like a waffle maker. Not very good for PCBs.
>
> We have those in the US too - they're simply called sandwich
> makers. Back home in Oz we call those sorts of crushed sandwiches
> "jaffles" (see for instance
> http://www.kookaburragas.com.au/foodware_jaffleirons.htm which is
> the old-fashioned manual style). Mmmm... a piping hot ham, cheese
> and tomato jaffle on wholegrain bread with plenty of butter - oh
> boy, SOOOOOOOOOOOOO tasty. Haven't had one in close to fifteen
> years.

Toast your bread, spread on the butter, add the ham etc, pop in
microwave for about 30 seconds, and you have it.

Tom Loredo

unread,
May 2, 2005, 2:44:16 PM5/2/05
to
> > I'm working on a project (which I'll probably market as a kit) that
> combines a non-contact temperature sensor with a simple PWM controller;
> you hack it into a toaster oven to turn it into a reasonably controlled
> reflow oven. It can handle the full preheat - reflow - cool temperature
> profile.

A project along these lines was published in Circuit Cellar not too
long ago, I believe. My recollection is that the author wasn't able
to get fantastic control over the thermal profile, but good enough
that he was happy with the results. I think this would be a great
kit; keep us posted. I think he used a thermocouple rather than
a non-contact sensor; your approach might work better though I
think it's the "thermal inertia" of the oven elements that's the
problem.

-Tom

Xiao Geng

unread,
May 2, 2005, 5:00:14 PM5/2/05
to

Gunnar wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I stumbled over an ad on www.circuitcellar.com about free PCB
software
> (http://www.pcb123.com/).
> I would like to have some feedback about this software from anyone
using it,
> possibly comparing it to other PCB software out there.
>
> My needs are simple, I am planning to build small projects for
personal use.
> On that note, how many of you are making your own boards at home? I
used to
> make boards 20-30 years ago, but at the time I used parts such as
> transistors and TTL ICs. Now with surface mount ICs it is scary
trying to
> make boards...
>

> My own thought is that it is better to have the boards made by a
> professional outfit.
>
> Thanks.
>
> Gunnar.

It's good enough for personal use. I used it.
The reason I chose it is that their PCB quotes are only half of others.
And they can mail you in several days. It's hard to find any big
company to take care of our personal-use boards.

I'll recommend it.

xg

0 new messages