Re: AI prompts and results newsgroup?

[vallor]

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 05:45:50 -0000 (UTC), Adam H. Kerman wrote:

> vallor <val...@vallor.earth> wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>
>>Is there a newsgroup where people
>>are discussing AI prompts and results? (Such
>>as: GPT4, DALL-E2, Bard, and so forth?)
>
>>Thinking that, somewhere on the Usenet, there must be a
>>discussion. comp.ai is moderated, and everywhere else
>>on comp.ai seems inappropriate. Wondered if there might be
>>an alt group.
>
>>Or if not, maybe we (tinw) can just pick an unused group
>>and post the prompt/result traffic there? (Beats me,
>>thought I'd ask...)
>
>>Thanks,
>
> There's always alt.comp.misc or comp.misc.
>
> comp.ai.* is a hierarchy. They aren't all moderated.
>
> comp.ai Artificial Intelligence. (Moderated)
> comp.ai.alife Research about artificial life.
> comp.ai.doc-analysis.misc General document understanding
technologies.
> comp.ai.doc-analysis.ocr OCR research, algorithms and software.
> comp.ai.edu Applications of Artificial Intelligence to
Education.
> comp.ai.fuzzy Fuzzy set theory, aka fuzzy logic.
> comp.ai.games Artificial intelligence in games and
> game-playing.
> comp.ai.genetic Genetic algorithms in computing.
> comp.ai.nat-lang Natural language processing by computers.
> comp.ai.neural-nets All aspects of neural networks.
> comp.ai.philosophy Philosophical aspects of Artificial Intelligence.
> comp.ai.shells Expert systems and other artificial
intelligence shells.
> comp.ai.vision Artificial Intelligence Vision Research.
(Moderated)

Thank you. comp.ai.shells looks like a good match, except I'm
not sure how interested they'd be with the io. But unless otherwise
directed, I'll see how that works.

Thank you.

fu2: news.groups

--
-v
(Scott)

[vallor]

On Thu, 20 Apr 2023 21:30:29 +0100, Sn!pe wrote:

> Tease'n'Seize <tease-and-seize@invalid> wrote:

>
>> vallor wrote:
>>
>> > comp.ai.shells looks like a good match, except I'm not sure how
>> > interested they'd be with the io.
>>

>> I expect they're all too busy pining for the fjords ...
>
> Have they fallen off the perch?

It's basically unused, but seems like it fits the bill.

A:
Would comp.ai.shells be an appropriate newsgroup to discuss ChatGPT4?

GPT4:
Yes, comp.ai.shells would be an appropriate newsgroup to discuss ChatGPT4,
as it is a forum for discussing artificial intelligence programming
environments, tools, and shells. ChatGPT4 is a large AI language model
that falls under the artificial intelligence umbrella, so it is relevant
to the interests of the newsgroup's participants.

--
-v

[Andy Burns]

vallor wrote:

> It's basically unused, but seems like it fits the bill.

Yeah, I can't see anyone likely to object if you try to re-purpose a
fried out group ...

[Sn!pe]

I would post "Is this group in use?" and if there is no answer
in a week, use it. If someone with a better claim comes later
to object, decamp to elsewhere. That would offend nobody.

I note that this thread has already been silently crossposted
to c.a.s. Poor form, that, IMHO.

--
^Ï^. – Sn!pe – My pet rock Gordon just is.

<https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

[vallor]

I hope so, just wanted to be in something close to the "right" group.

"AI" was in a much different state back then...

--
-v