Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

male+female bias networking sites and data usages

0 views
Skip to first unread message

N

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 7:08:16 PM12/25/09
to
just and idea...although I NEVER EVER gotten into hassel or trouble on
30 years networking with MEN alone wivout gossip or so called 'help'
or 'fessing up' fer braggage or creds? kinda REAL without
females...network ALL MALE and peaceful ...so 'if' there is a link
with the 9/11 masacre the information woulda cum all from female
networks NEVER MINE


ok...if we're in with the FBI (perhaps who will be reading this,
checking up on potential occasion for terrorist activity? who knows)
Are there any men who wholly deal with FEMALE NETWORKING? men who
never ever share information amongst other men at at all!

Ray? what do ya say, huh!

N

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 7:21:07 PM12/25/09
to
male networking .v. female networking logic, discipline and rewards
(for marketing and adverts that I'm pretty sure it'd be fairly well
researched or funded I'm clear about that) ...? ...but what about the
logic and ai significance ional regards adaptability, suitability for
function, purpose, and inventiveness & stability of function

Don Stockbauer

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 8:17:14 PM12/25/09
to

Hey, mysterious "N" lady, howzit going? Having a nice Xmas over there
in that ferrin land?

N

unread,
Dec 25, 2009, 8:29:49 PM12/25/09
to

Happy Christmas 'function code' Don !? :) just watching 'Gladiator' om
the TV (phew! corr? :p) and wondering how no one aquitted 'foxy knoxy'
I mean to say...? crime of passion or drug fucks? ...wouldnt any warm
blooded female no sympathy for a woman who was passionatly in love
with her man?

Don Stockbauer

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 1:07:01 AM12/26/09
to

"Function Code" Don, been a long time since n e 1's called me that.
Thanks!

N

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 4:44:08 PM12/26/09
to

> "Function Code" Don, been a long time since n e 1's called me that.
> Thanks!

! :) , its all getting slightly rediculous where I am.. I can't
believe that my doing some research (which was actually a part of my
studies) and indulging in my interest in graphics and computer
industry technology really could have caused me such hassel ? why
would anyone want to interfere with a private interest which was
genuinely to do with some work or a future part or subject for a
further higher degree?

I really cant believe that people can be so hideously damned awful ! ,
but yes I do sympathize and if and where I can help out I do...but if
such interference has caused me to marginalize my real interest, my
potential to find employment, and which has affected my personal and
private life too, I can really see no need to post anymore on an open
public web site. Is it to be, that for some unknown cause or purpose
by some group we can't seem to have 'free speech' either now!

Don Stockbauer

unread,
Dec 26, 2009, 5:55:07 PM12/26/09
to

You must someday tell me more explicitly about "I can't believe that


my doing some research (which was actually a part of my
studies) and indulging in my interest in graphics and computer
industry technology really could have caused me such hassel ? why
would anyone want to interfere with a private interest which was
genuinely to do with some work or a future part or subject for a
further higher degree?"

I can't always figure out what you're trying to say.

0 new messages