Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.

Dismiss

Lottery Prediction Using Neural Networks

14,403 views

Skip to first unread message

Conrad Thames

unread,

Dec 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/4/99

Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial
neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
what approach did you use?

Breslauer Family

unread,

Dec 4, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/4/99

Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.

IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any method,
would they

1. Tell you how they did it.
2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while surrounded by the
most beautiful compliant bodies and the wonderous trappings of material
success that their ability could affort them.
3. Educate someone like yourself.

Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.

Klaus Breslauer

Conrad Thames <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:82cglt$ajv$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net...

Will Dwinnell

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Conrad Thames wrote:
"Is there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial neural
network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
what approach did you use?"

To hear bj flanagan tell it, this should be easy using HNeT.

Will Dwinnell
pred...@compuserve.com

st...@tropheus.demon.co.uk

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

On Sat, 4 Dec 1999 20:54:17 -0500, "Conrad Thames"
<conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote:

>Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial

>neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
>what approach did you use?
>

You cannot predict any lottery outcome. You can use a neural network
to show that it can't be done. If you produce a neural network that is
trained to find relationships between historical lottery draws then it
will find some. If you then test it with different draws it will be
wrong in every case.

Steve
--
Steve Wolstenholme
Neural Network Applications for Windows
http://www.tropheus.demon.co.uk

Uwe Borchert

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Hello Conrad and Steve,

..[predict a lottery outcome]...

>You cannot predict any lottery outcome. You can use a neural network
>to show that it can't be done. If you produce a neural network that is
>trained to find relationships between historical lottery draws then it
>will find some. If you then test it with different draws it will be
>wrong in every case.
>

It depends on your definition of prediction. I would interpret this
Question like this: whats the likelihood for every number to be drawn.
This is predictable. And you can find differences between the theo-
retical homogeneous likelihood and the real statistical likelihood.
But: the differences do not give you a chance to get more money back
than you pay for the lottery. The german Lotto "6 aus 49" gives only
50% back. So you must double your prediction. This looks a little bit
impossible. If you try to make money: work for the lotteries!

If you realy try to make make by gambling yous should use statistics
and think about the major occurenc of the numbers from 1 to 12 (month)
and 1 to 31 (day) and so on...

IOU / MfG

Uwe Borchert

alain proux

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Lottery is (should be) totally random.
Getting some prediction using a NN would mean this lottery is biased.
The only sensible thing you could try is to detect the less bet numbers so as to
get more money
when you happen to get the right result. But you should need some statistics
from this lottery...
Good luck!
apx

Conrad Thames a écrit:

Paul Victor Birke

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Will Dwinnell wrote:

>
> Conrad Thames wrote:
> "Is there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial neural
> network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
> what approach did you use?"
>

> To hear bj flanagan tell it, this should be easy using HNeT.

*************************************
Dear Will

I think I finally >>got it<< !!!

HNet is clairvoyant !!

Paul

MVCS

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

"Conrad Thames" <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial

>neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
>what approach did you use?

I was involved in an intense effort to show that such prediction is
not possible.... or show that it is. The lottery was the Italian
lottery. Historical record is over a 100 year period. 4 or 6 lottery
sites are involved (I can't remember which). Lottery rules changed 2
or 3 times during the 100 year period covered by the record. VERY
explicit and detailed description is available for all processes and
mechanisms used in the lottery. Details of known and documented cases
of "stacking the lottery" are recorded over the past 100 years.
Lottery methods have been perfected especially over the past 3 decades
or so that make cheating impossible or easily identified and
corrections made for the effects of cheating.

The method I used to perform this test is based on my commercial
software: back prop with a coupled simulating-annealing plus error
correction algorithm that simultaneously optimized network "energy"
and training error (which makes a "tight" fit with low errors... sort
of like constraining the second derivative of the "fitted function"
with a maximum tension algorithm). Brainstates were developed for many
scenarios, including time windowed data, non windowed data, prediction
of lotto results in each of the 4 or 6 lotto sites, prediction of the
ultimate lotto from raw data, prediction of ultimate lotto from the 4
or 6 lotto sites, etc.

Results showed an amazing and very frightening ability of my
commercial software product to match lotto results nearly 100% of the
time (for the valid portions of the data sets) regardless of how the
data was organized or segmented. Very small brainstates produced very
scary results.

Results also showed that once a brainstate was developed that matched
the data perfectly or almost perfectly, there was ABSOLUTELY NO
ABILITY OF THAT TRAINED BRAINSTATE TO PREDICT ANY EVENT IN THE FUTURE.

Conclusions: NNs of the type I used are able to encode ordered
structure and events almost perfectly for the system being
investigated. The encoding apparently utilized the large number of
effective-degrees-of-freedom contained in the brainstates as a matter
of the fitting method used (backprop with embedded annealing plus
optimization of network energy and error residuals).

Discussion: One would not think that there could be enough degrees of
freedom in a simple NN brainstate to encode random lotto results over
the past 100 years (minus some bogus data), but that is what MUST be
happening. No one knows how to estimate the number of degrees of
freedom in a back prop NN... but this study shows that (depending on
the system being studied) there can be an extremely large number of
effective-degrees-of-freedom encoded by simple structures. That there
was not one lotto result that was able to be predicted even as well as
"a throw of the dice" is proof that no predictive structure was
encoded by the NNs. They merely "grandmothered" the entire system....
even with all the protections against such "grandmothering" that were
utilized.

A separate study was undertaken to predict Texas lotto results several
years ago. The result of that study was that over about a 3 month
cycle a NN was able to "get better" at predicting lotto results. Then
things would fall apart again. My interpretation was that the
mechanical mechanisms used to perform the lotto were somehow involved,
and the continual monitoring and refurbishing of the devices (which
oddly enough seemed to coincide more or less with the "change of
states" detected by the ability/inability of a trained NN to predict
results) was based on sound statistical studies and theory so that the
system would remain as random as possible. However, this study also
demonstrated that there would be no way to predict the lottery.... and
that was back then. The game has been changed enough since then to
eliminate any ability to predict results (e.g., once a ball is
removed, another with the same numerical symbols is added so that
probability to select any number remains the same as a function of the
time during which the lottery is being performed).

These tests were NOT pursued because I thought they would be a
success. My intent was to test my system on random systems to make
certain there were not biases in the code. I made full disclosure of
this to the people for whom I performed the studies and made NO
representations that I thought the tests would provide what they
wanted. I have never, do not now, nor will I ever think that lotto
results can be predicted by anyone other than God. And He has made it
clear that He is not talking about that sort of stuff.

Peter Davies

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Such predictions, whether one uses neural networks or other methods, would
be futile. Even if there is some bias, one would not be able to increase
the odds enough to make it worthwhile. The amount paid from a lotteries is
only a fraction of the money taken in. (This is, of course, why governments
like them so much!)

In some games of chance the situation is somewhat different. For example,
with roulette the odds are only slightly in the house's favour. So if you
can take advantage in any imbalance in the wheel, you might have a chance at
swinging the odds in your favour. (I am only looking at the example
theoretically. The number of observations one would have to use would be
enormous, rendering the exercise potentially intractable. However, in
theory, it might work.) Horse racing may also be another arena where there
is potential, since the odds are only marginally against the punter.

But the lottery? Forget about it. Buy tickets if you must but don't spend
any more time trying to increase the odds of a very poor bet.

Peter Davies

Breslauer Family

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

I wouldn't be too sure.
I am on phase 2 of a 3 part plan to seriously test the financial markets
prediction stuff.

I believe the fundamental limitation in using Neural Nets to predict
financial markets is the assumption that enough of the information needed
for good predictions is contained in the price/value history, which it is
clearly not.

Phase one was developing a new methodology for general neural network
prediction, and luckily the contest where I first tried it out was to ..ta
da.. predict financial markets, which I won.

http://www.cas.american.edu/~medsker/ijcnn99/ijcnn99.html

As for lottery predictions, I spent about two weeks this summer playing with
the Canadian 6/49 data, astrological and geometrical positions of the
heavenly bodies, and regularly TRAINED nets that were GREAT at remembering
the winning patterns. However, they never did TEST worth a damn, and that
lead to a large study of the 'randomness' of correlations, the results of
which assist me in deciding which composite functions to keep out of the
billions of possibilities.

I did get one net to TEST fairly well on the Lotto, but that was due to a
logical error in the use of spline-fitting algorithms. Basically, I gave
the net an input peak at the future, which of course is flawed. I must
admit to having been quite excited for about 10 minutes, then I had to
figure out where I went wrong.

My main point was that, who would give away what was worth millions?

Best luck on the lotto, I'm playing with some sports information, to see if
I can successfully add the non-numeric data, and then beat the bookies. And
then the brokers.

Klaus Breslauer, UBC

Andrew Gray <ag...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message
news:uso1hn...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz...

> "Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
> > Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.
> > IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any
method,
> > would they
> > 1. Tell you how they did it.
> > 2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while surrounded by
the
> > most beautiful compliant bodies and the wonderous trappings of material
> > success that their ability could affort them.
> > 3. Educate someone like yourself.
> >
> > Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.

> ^think, ^think,
> (I'd insert a few more `think's there)
>
> This obviously also goes for predicting financial markets.

>
> > Conrad Thames <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> > news:82cglt$ajv$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net...
>

> >> Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use
> >> artificial neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome
> >> successfully? If so, what approach did you use?
>

> The best you could do, with any lottery prediction scheme (as I'm sure
> has been discussed in this group before, is this a FAQ yet?), is to
> predict which numbers and combinations of numbers people select and
> then select different numbers and combinations to maximise your payout
> (by minimising the number of winners you have to share with when your
> numbers do come up). You would probably be better sticking with
> classical probability for this where you could derive exact solutions
> (assuming stationarity).
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew

Breslauer Family

unread,

Dec 5, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/5/99

Sorry if I misinterpreted your intention.

I find it absolutely astounding, amazing that people ask for solutions to
valuable problems be given to them. I guess learning how to search using a
decent engine like Altavista is just too hard. Maybe they could try +"free
money" +"easy street" -amway +"idiots' guide to making big money with no
effort"

Best of luck on neural stuff...

Klaus

Andrew Gray <ag...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message

news:ud7skl...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz...

> "Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
> > I wouldn't be too sure.
> > I am on phase 2 of a 3 part plan to seriously test the financial
> > markets prediction stuff.
>

> My point was that if anyone did `solve' any of the financial market
> prediction problems they would be unlikely to share their acquired
> knowledge. Ditto for any other money making schemes.
>
> <SNIP>

>
> > Andrew Gray <ag...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message
> > news:uso1hn...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz...
> >> "Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
> >>> Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.
> >>> IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any
> >>> method, would they
> >>> 1. Tell you how they did it.
> >>> 2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while
> >>> surrounded by the most beautiful compliant bodies and the
> >>> wonderous trappings of material success that their ability could
> >>> affort them.
> >>> 3. Educate someone like yourself.
> >>>
> >>> Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.
> >> ^think, ^think,
> >> (I'd insert a few more `think's there)
> >>
> >> This obviously also goes for predicting financial markets.
>

> <SNIP>
>
> Cheers,
> Andrew
>
>
>

Andrew Gray

unread,

Dec 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/6/99

"Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
> Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.
> IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any method,
> would they
> 1. Tell you how they did it.
> 2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while surrounded by the
> most beautiful compliant bodies and the wonderous trappings of material
> success that their ability could affort them.
> 3. Educate someone like yourself.
>
> Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.
^think, ^think,
(I'd insert a few more `think's there)

This obviously also goes for predicting financial markets.

> Conrad Thames <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

Andrew Gray

unread,

Dec 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/6/99

"Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
> I wouldn't be too sure.
> I am on phase 2 of a 3 part plan to seriously test the financial
> markets prediction stuff.

My point was that if anyone did `solve' any of the financial market
prediction problems they would be unlikely to share their acquired
knowledge. Ditto for any other money making schemes.

<SNIP>

> Andrew Gray <ag...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz> wrote in message
> news:uso1hn...@infoscience.otago.ac.nz...

>> "Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
>>> Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.
>>> IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any
>>> method, would they
>>> 1. Tell you how they did it.
>>> 2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while
>>> surrounded by the most beautiful compliant bodies and the
>>> wonderous trappings of material success that their ability could
>>> affort them.
>>> 3. Educate someone like yourself.
>>>
>>> Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.
>> ^think, ^think,
>> (I'd insert a few more `think's there)
>>
>> This obviously also goes for predicting financial markets.

<SNIP>

Cheers,
Andrew

MVCS

unread,

Dec 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/6/99

"Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> wrote:
>...I am on phase 2 of a 3 part plan to seriously test the financial markets
>prediction stuff.

The original Q was about lotto, not predicting the monetary activity
of socio-ec systems.

>
>I believe the fundamental limitation in using Neural Nets to predict
>financial markets is the assumption that enough of the information needed
>for good predictions is contained in the price/value history, which it is

>clearly not....

Predicting a system with erroneous formalism will produce prediction
errors. If the formalism is improperly parameterized, then even the
best formalism will produce prediction errors.

Regarding NNs vs linear methods used for predicting financial systems,
see:

".... In short, there is little agreement about the existence of chaos
or even of non-linearity in economic data, and some economists
continue to insist that linearity remains a good assumption for all
economic time series, despite the fact that economic theory provides
little support for the assumption of linearity. This paper explores
the reasons for these empirical difficulties. ...."

This is from "A SINGLE-BLIND CONTROLLED COMPETITION AMONG TESTS FOR
NON-LINEARITY AND CHAOS" which can be obtained here:

http://wuecon.wustl.edu/~barnett/Papers.html

E. Robert Tisdale

unread,

Dec 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/6/99

Conrad Thames wrote:

> Is there anyone out there who has tried
> to use artificial neural network technology
> to predict a lottery outcome successfully?
> If so, what approach did you use?

Yes. Many people have tried many different approaches.
But the lottery is designed or at least should be designed
to be unpredictable and there are a lot of professional people
who run tests to make sure that it isn't rigged
or that some other unintentional systematic "bias"
isn't introduced into the system. But I don't know
whether anyone uses ANNs to do any of this work.

It is better to turn your attention to financial markets
where there are small built-in biases that you may be able
to detect with an artificial neural network.
There are people all over the world who do this
but they guard their secrets carefully
mostly because they don't want their competition
to know how bad or good their tools really are.

Uwe Borchert

unread,

Dec 6, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/6/99

Hello,

..[...]...

>
>As for lottery predictions, I spent about two weeks this summer playing with
>the Canadian 6/49 data, astrological and geometrical positions of the
>heavenly bodies, and regularly TRAINED nets that were GREAT at remembering
>the winning patterns. However, they never did TEST worth a damn, and that
>lead to a large study of the 'randomness' of correlations, the results of
>which assist me in deciding which composite functions to keep out of the
>billions of possibilities.
>

I would prefer another way of thinking. Every ball has mechanical
properties. This mechanical properties would influence the statistics.
Next would be to describe the likelihood of the number in relation to
the old drawings results. You need a lot of data input and you can
throw it away i the balls are changed. And dont forget to predict
which numbers and combinations of numbers people select. So the result
should be something like: a few combination with high likelihood and
with less often selected numbers.

ByByte...

Uwe Borchert

ju...@my-deja.com

unread,

Dec 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/7/99

In article <82cglt$ajv$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net>,
"Conrad Thames" <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote:
> Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial

> neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully?
If so,
> what approach did you use?
>

You can e.g. use MLP with backprob learning using the history to
learn the network. You must have enough history data available.
In practice, it is learning noise and you will get quite random
outputs just like using some random number generator. Not a better
approach than any other.

Juha K.

Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
Before you buy.

Jerry

unread,

Dec 7, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/7/99

While predicting the exact nature and future movement of say...the stock
market would be highly improbable, using a neural net system to model enough
of the market to make a profit should not be. In another ai field (using
genetic based systems) there was some small success at it a few years ago.
It's amazing what obscure information one can remember from the evening news
after a few years.

Andrew Gray wrote in message ...

>"Breslauer Family" <fam...@direct.ca> writes:
>> I wouldn't be too sure.

>> I am on phase 2 of a 3 part plan to seriously test the financial
>> markets prediction stuff.
>

Will Dwinnell

unread,

Dec 9, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/9/99

Conrad Thames wrote:
"Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial
neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If
so, what approach did you use?"

ju...@my-deja.com responded:

"You can e.g. use MLP with backprob learning using the history to learn
the network. You must have enough history data available. In practice,
it is learning noise and you will get quite random outputs just like
using some random number generator. Not a better
approach than any other."

You will not get "random" results. Assuming that one overfit the data,
you will get a very strange function which is anchored at random points,
but which will move more or less smoothly between them. Assuming that
one does not overfit the data, the output will approach the
probabilities of the numbers being drawn over the long run. Significant
differences from the analytical probabilities will be difficult to
detect using this method.

Will Dwinnell
pred...@compuserve.com

MVCS

unread,

Dec 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/10/99

Will Dwinnell <pred...@compuserve.com> wrote:
>..... Assuming that

>one does not overfit the data, the output will approach the

>probabilities of the numbers being drawn over the long run...

If the means tend to group together within the range of normalizations
(ie, if all normalized means group around the value 0.5 or 0.2 or 0.8
or whatever), and the variances are large compared to the spread of
the means, then "safe", non-overfit brainstates will probably produce
uninteresting, fairly "dead", inactive results, eh? The best fit to
"noise" is a fairly straight line.

What do you think?
-Jeff

Carl Cook

unread,

Dec 10, 1999, 3:00:00 AM12/10/99

Hi Andrew,

We offer BioComp Profit, a successful financial markets timing software
tool. It's available, in demo mode, from our website at:

http://www.biocompsystems.com

>My point was that if anyone did `solve' any of the financial market
>prediction problems they would be unlikely to share their acquired
>knowledge. Ditto for any other money making schemes.

We sell BioComp Profit because it works. We're a software company. If we
create software that works, we sell it and customers buy it <wink>.

Carl Cook
BioComp Systems, Inc.

Ion Saliu

unread,

Sep 5, 2018, 1:35:19 PM9/5/18

On Saturday, December 4, 1999 at 3:00:00 AM UTC-5, Breslauer Family wrote:
> Please attempt to breathe and think at the same time.
>
> IF anyone had predicted the lotto numbers with Neural Nets or any method,
> would they
>
> 1. Tell you how they did it.
> 2. Read this newsgroup from a beach front resort, while surrounded by the
> most beautiful compliant bodies and the wonderous trappings of material
> success that their ability could affort them.
> 3. Educate someone like yourself.
>
> Breathe, breathe, think, breathe, repeat if necessary.
>

> Klaus Breslauer

>
>
> Conrad Thames <conrad...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:82cglt$ajv$1...@bgtnsc01.worldnet.att.net...

> > Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial
> > neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If
> so,
> > what approach did you use?
> >
> >

Axiomatics:

1999! O tempora! O mores! Old shoes, old schools!

The problem everybody here has is the overlapping of contradicting concepts: Certainty and Randomness. Everything is random, inquisitively axiomatic ones, indeed, the Universe. The_Everything comes in degrees of certainty (DC). Various degrees of certainty determine various degrees of randomness.

The confusion goes further by using a 'fancy' concept: 'Neural networking'. Even 'fancier': 'Artificial intelligence (AI)'. In fract, all those theories do one thing. They try to find relations between elements of a system, relations that took place in the past. From those past relations (more accurately named 'stats'), this type of theories (AI, etc.) try to predict future relations between the same elements.

Methinks it all this 'fancy' stuff started with the Markov Chains. That theory is simplistic, however. It bases the analysis on a reduced number of elements that have higher degrees of certainty DC to occur. The system (container) of such elements is considered 'non-random'. Again, contradiction in terms as everything is random (mathematically proven beyond reasonable doubt).

And that explains why you hear "Neural networking, artificial intelligence AI cannot be applied to lottery, because the lottery is totally (?) random!"

Well, I got good news for you. Neural networking does work with the lottery as far as more "successful prediction" is possible based on statistics (what happened in the past). You can read (and surely replicate) a case where neural networking applied to a lotto game beat random play by a factor of 37. Yes, the AI strategy was 37 times better than simply selecting lotto numeros randomly!

saliu.com/neural-networking-lottery.html
Neural Networking, Neural Networks, AI in Lottery, Lotto: Strategies, Systems, Software, History

When I tried first to reply to this thread, Google Groups simply created a whole new thread with my reply only:

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.ai.neural-nets/5Ds2Jt2olks
Neural Networking, Neural Networks, AI in Lottery, Lotto: Strategies, Systems, Software, History

Best of luck in all your predictions, axios!

Ion Saliu,
Founder of Neural Networking in Lottery
“A good man is an axiomatic man; an axiomatic man is a happy man. Be axiomatic!”

Ion Saliu

unread,

Dec 1, 2018, 1:28:43 PM12/1/18

On Wednesday, September 5, 2018 at 1:35:19 PM UTC-4, Ion Saliu wrote:
>
… updating links to HTTPS…
>
https://saliu.com/neural-networking-lottery.html
"Neural Networking, Neural Networks, AI in Lottery, Lotto: Strategies, Systems, Software, History".

lotteryp...@gmail.com

unread,

Apr 1, 2019, 8:54:56 PM4/1/19

saliu is bullshitting here again

Ion Saliu

unread,

Jun 8, 2020, 6:44:27 AM6/8/20

On Tuesday, April 2, 2019 at 3:54:56 AM UTC+3, lotteryp...@gmail.com wrote:
> saliu is bullshitting here again

Ce-ai ba, mielu turbat al lu Mnezau si Sant Ketru? What's with you, rabid lamb of God and Saint Keter? You follow me everywhere?

Yes, half-twit, “artificial intelligence” is an oxymoron. Computers have no intelligence and cannot learn anything. They can only execute instructions in the software programs they run.

The “artificial intelligence” misnomer means a special type of computer programming. I call it ‘GIGANTIC-DATABASE SOFTWARE’. I think it originated in dBaseIII+. “Artificial intelligence” put the legendary software… on steroids. More and more powerful computers have been able to process huger and huger amounts of data, faster and faster. This is a form of brute-force data-processing. Google put it eloquently in one of their TV ads: “Know what your data knows”.

I wrote in this very Usenet group how I discovered relationships in lottery data (i.e. drawings). No computer could have discovered such relations (e.g. patterns, filters, etc.) It was me, the programmer, who devised pertinent algorithms, and then implemented them in specialized software. It is not “artificial intelligence” — IT IS MY INTELLIGENCE. No supercomputer can “learn” how to deal with the lottery the same way my software does. Unless, of course, I reveal my algorithms to other software developers! Read:

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.ai.neural-nets/5Ds2Jt2olks
• “Neural Networking, Neural Networks, AI in Lottery, Lotto: Strategies, Systems, Software, History”

In another thread in this newsgroup I demonstrated that no computer can “learn” by itself even basic counting, like from 1 to 10. But, no doubt, many a programmer should be able to easily write software that *will make* any computer… count!

• https://groups.google.com/forum/#!topic/comp.ai.neural-nets/-GLUuzn-8cQ
• “Neural Net Counting.”

My in-depth take on “artificial intelligence” in general, AxI applied to lottery in special, is hosted at this one-of-a-kind address:

• https://saliu.com/neural-networking-lottery.html
• Neural Networking, Neural Networks, “AI” in Lottery, Lotto: Prediction Strategies, Systems, Software, History.

“Believing in artificial intelligence (AI) literally is like getting drunk with illusions metaphorically.”

Ion Saliu,
Founder of Axiomatic Intelligence (AxI)
“The unknown hides in plain sight on the path of the axiomatics.”

Justin King

unread,

Apr 18, 2022, 5:47:58 AM4/18/22

Enlish is not my first language, I hope there is no barrier for me to talk with you further down on probability esp about pick 3. I have great interest in studying probability too and have gained some insights on predicting lottery pick 3/cash 3. I do respect your ways to prediction and I also want to introduce my tricks to you. I hope you could speare little time for me.
There are different angles to observe pick 3.
0369 147 258
2357 0189 46
012 3456 789
each group has its fixed probability and outcomes but their showing up frequence is varied according to their odds.
The total combination of 2 numbers is 488 outcomes which means it takes up 48.8% or 49% approxiamtely of each draw.And the whole combination of 3 numbers is 657 outcomes which takes up 66% of each draw. Take new york evening pick 3 as an example. We observe number 5 and 7 ,taking them as a whole of 488outcomes 49%,which means it has 50% chance showing up or not showing up in each draw. That equals to the head or tail of fliping a coin.

----------
656 head
017 head
442 tail
613 T
986 T
896 T
043 T
269 T
003 T
724 head
----------
656 5
017 7
442 /
613 /
986 /
896 /
043 /
269 /
003 /
724 7 this period 5.7 are missing consecutively for 7 times.
--------------
how do we now that 2 numbers actual frequences? According to very large data history I find that normally 49% shows up 2 or 3 times continually or misses 2 or 3 times consecutively.If 49% has shown up the third drawing then it's lilkely some unexpentency of its random outcomes. let me show you some more example observing the number 5 and 7 the 49% percentage.
-----
987 7
238 /
233 /
052 5
656 5
276 7 contince
835 5 unexpectency of usual outcome
729 7
068 / normally 5 times is the bondary of normal unexpectency
491 /
983 / three times missing number 5 7
325 5
568 5
343 /
409 /
658 5
288 /
201 /
768 7
165 5
086 /
527 57
859 5
123 /
609 /
166 / bondary of normal randoness
782 7 showing up as expected after missing 2 or 3 times
610 /
594 5
106 /
331 /
788 7
485 5

I despartely need you to talk with me on skype app. Please.
If you have any interest to know more don't hesitate to contact me on skype or email. edenlove 828@ hotmail . com

Justin King

unread,

Apr 18, 2022, 5:56:57 AM4/18/22

Dev Seo

unread,

Jul 8, 2022, 1:16:03 AM7/8/22

The content is great here, and I have found a lot of interesting things to read.

Follow this links

https://bit.ly/3RgkWSf
https://bit.ly/3yk2hMN
https://bit.ly/3P8CPka
https://bit.ly/3ahERzH
https://bit.ly/3ykpVJ6
https://bit.ly/3yHHkf1
https://bit.ly/3bZfYcx
https://bit.ly/3Rh7o91
https://bit.ly/3ymc7gX
https://bit.ly/3nIrRWT
https://bit.ly/3IiC2Lj
https://bit.ly/3Imof6v
https://bit.ly/3IlR8zA
https://bit.ly/3RgzVvu
https://bit.ly/3AzvQwE

Jonny jon

unread,

Dec 16, 2022, 1:04:17 PM12/16/22

Stephen Wolstenholme

unread,

Dec 17, 2022, 8:26:22 AM12/17/22

On Fri, 16 Dec 2022 10:04:14 -0800 (PST), Jonny jon
<jounn...@gmail.com> wrote:

>Follow This Link

Why?

Leonard Linton

unread,

Jan 7, 2023, 1:08:24 AM1/7/23

On Saturday, December 4, 1999 at 4:00:00 PM UTC+8, Conrad Thames wrote:
> Network BlitzIs there anyone out there who has tried to use artificial
> neural network technology to predict a lottery outcome successfully? If so,
> what approach did you use?

It’s an honor to share this testimony to the world. Dr Benjamin you're a blessing to our generation. I have always desired to win lottery some day, at some point I thought it was something impossible, until I came across series of testimonies on how had helped a lot of people win lottery, at first I was so skeptical about it because I haven't seen a things as such in my life, at a second thought I decided to give it a try so I emailled him via his person email, he replied me and instructed me on what to do, after 24 hours he gave me some numbers and I won $2 million just like that. Dr Bejamin I owe everything for making me the man that I am right. If you need his help below is his contact information, he can help too
Email: drbenjaminl...@gmail.com
Whatsapp:+17066036031

deepak Singh

unread,

Jan 12, 2023, 12:26:42 AM1/12/23

https://bit.ly/3XdAMiH
https://bit.ly/3W00y90
https://bit.ly/3CB9XNE
https://bit.ly/3X7gNlM
https://bit.ly/3XdXdEy
https://bit.ly/3XdQbQ7
https://bit.ly/3jURogF
https://bit.ly/3jZhorm
https://bit.ly/3Czh6hd
https://bit.ly/3GrhrDR
https://bit.ly/3WXTs6e
https://bit.ly/3WW355z
https://bit.ly/3GrBT7N
https://bit.ly/3Xc4pS5
https://bit.ly/3WW38yh
https://bit.ly/3Gjn9aU
https://bit.ly/3CBXdWT
https://bit.ly/3ZxrsIy
https://bit.ly/3k66fVy
https://bit.ly/3irK7EY
https://bit.ly/3GPM1bF
https://bit.ly/3VXgYzd
https://bit.ly/3VWGynT
https://bit.ly/3k0GMgt
https://bit.ly/3CxQRYL
https://bit.ly/3VQUsYt
https://bit.ly/3GRjrH8
https://bit.ly/3GQuzUw
https://bit.ly/3ZoUOZB
https://bit.ly/3ioUsRX
https://bit.ly/3k1pAHI
https://bit.ly/3vM9t3t
https://bit.ly/3vNE6p3
https://bit.ly/3GQnDa3
https://bit.ly/3vLu8EL
https://bit.ly/3vMzVK7
https://bit.ly/3WXOIO1
https://bit.ly/3WW3PYp
https://bit.ly/3jZhMWQ
https://bit.ly/3vLVbzG
https://bit.ly/3ilOe5e

Stephen Wolstenholme

unread,

Jan 12, 2023, 8:18:15 AM1/12/23

Neural networks can be trained using old lottery results but they will
fail when using old lottery results for validating or querying.

Murphy Chloe

unread,

Jan 17, 2023, 8:56:43 AM1/17/23

harish Kumar

unread,

Jan 25, 2023, 7:20:37 AM1/25/23

harish Kumar

unread,

Jan 27, 2023, 3:02:24 PM1/27/23

Harsh Kaushik

unread,

Jan 30, 2023, 5:54:50 AM1/30/23

Ion Saliu

unread,

Mar 27, 2023, 6:27:32 AM3/27/23

Search-engine programming advanced with rapid paces. Now, they can interact with Netizens almost like human beings. There are AI chatbots that behave in the manner of human researchers. I tested two AI chatbots on ‘Ion Saliu’ and ‘artificial intelligence, lottery prediction Ion Saliu’.

This highest-ranking Usenet post deserves this companion:

• https://groups.google.com/g/comp.ai.neural-nets/c/MIqOcXqgPNs?hl=en
• Artificial Intelligence, Lottery Prediction: Chatbots, Ion Saliu.

Blogs Marto

unread,

Apr 6, 2023, 12:21:19 PM4/6/23

David Smith

unread,

May 29, 2023, 4:37:04 AM5/29/23

I will continue to testify about Dr marcus for bringing joy and happiness into my life. My name are David Smith, and I love playing the lottery game, I have been buying lottery tickets for so many years, but I have not been lucky enough to win, but still hoping I win some days, on this very faithful day when I was doing review about the lottery I saw someone comment about how a man help her won the lottery, I was a bit skeptical but decided to give it a try. So I copied the email DRMACUSSP...@GMAIL.COM on the comment and sent him a message, he responded in two days time! ( Yes he can help me win the lottery) I was so happy, I gave him all his requirements, so he proceeded with his work. He gave the five numbers 20,34,39,43,57 which I can still clearly remember! So I went ahead and bought my ticket at Michiganlottery.com, I was checking my tickets online on Wednesday morning, and out of the corner of my eye I saw the $1 million prize. Thanks to the megaplier, my prize was multiplied by three for a $3 million prize. I quickly called my wife right away and it took me 10 minutes to convince her we'd won $3 million. But she was still skeptical, so she had me send her a screenshot and then google the numbers herself. We were both stunned. I was still in shock. This was the largest ever winning ticket bought at Michiganlottery.com. I later visited lottery headquarters on Friday to claim the big prize. And I was awarded a check of 3 million dollars. All thanks to Dr Marcus he's indeed a great man. You can reach him directly on his Whatsapp+2348110492028

0 new messages