XML formatted answer

1 view
Skip to first unread message

Mic

unread,
Jun 7, 2008, 5:25:06 AM6/7/08
to CommentBack
I'm just wondering if it's useful to have an xml formatted answer from
the server or if a simple string with a defined specification should
be enough for the needs of the CommentBack protocol.
What do you think about it?

Mic

Mic

unread,
Jun 10, 2008, 4:00:46 AM6/10/08
to CommentBack
Thanks to el_ponchito for pointing this out directly via email to me.
I've added the XML-RPC interface to the protocol.
I'm really new to the XML-RPC spec, so if someone wants to help,
please contact me.

Mic

Joseph Scott

unread,
Jun 10, 2008, 9:46:08 AM6/10/08
to CommentBack
When I first read over the specs you'd written XML-RPC was my first
thought. There's already a discovery mechanism in place (RSD) and
WordPress already has support for it.

I like XML-RPC and work on the WordPress XML-RPC code, so I'm a little
biased that direction any way :-)

--
Joseph Scott

Mic

unread,
Jun 10, 2008, 6:04:10 PM6/10/08
to CommentBack


On 10 Giu, 15:46, Joseph Scott <josephsc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> When I first read over the specs you'd written XML-RPC was my first
> thought.  There's already a discovery mechanism in place (RSD) and
> WordPress already has support for it.
>
> I like XML-RPC and work on the WordPress XML-RPC code, so I'm a little
> biased that direction any way :-)

That's good.
I've never gone inside this kind of protocols before (as you probably
saw reading the first draft).
So you're our XML-RPC expert. ;-)
If you've time to check the new draft (now it's online the Draft 3),
tell me if the XML-RPC spec I wrote is correct.
Thanks!

Mic
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages