COMBINE annotation community:
As you may know, in April of 2020, we ratified version 1.0 of the
OMEX metadata specification. At the time, we only had early
versions of tool support for this standard. We have now developed
a much more robust library, libOmexMeta (and pyomexmeta) that
provides library support for the standard. (See our 2021
publication in Bioinformatics)
During development, we made some minor changes to the
specifications, resulting in version 1.1. Most recently, the
editors have engaged in another round of improvements and changes
to the specification, and these are reflected in version 1.2.
We are now asking for ratification of version 1.2. The
specifications are available at
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1d_tkxWOkHO6FnNR4EXM5KiTQsQLJNDKJ/view?usp=sharing
As before, we have set up a Google forms survey at
https://forms.gle/6ZwDfVs4J823uKmd6
Please respond within the next two weeks (by August 4, 2021).
Thanks in advance for casting your ballot!
Sincerely,
The Editors of the OMEX Metadata Specification: John Gennari,
Matthias König, Goksel Misirli, Max Neal, David Nickerson, Dagmar
Waltemath
++++++++++++++
For those who care, some brief words about what is new in version
1.2:
First, the spirit and goals of the document remain the same, thus
all changes are considered "minor" and as improvements to the
recommended RDF in annotation files.
** The largest change from version 1.0 is the addition of some
"model-level" annotations. (These were largely omitted in v1.0.)
These include authors, publication, and date of creation. We
leverage Dublin Core for many of these terms. We also advocate the
use of orcid IDs to identify authors and contributors. We
recognize that more work needs to be done in this area.
**In version 1.2, we use absolute URIs, rather than the relative
"./" conventions used in version 1.0. To do this, we have
introduced a placeholder URI, omex-library.org to use as the root
of all annotations.
** There are many other syntactic and clarity changes. For
example, we now provide a more clear (we hope) distinction between
how composite annotations occur for SBML models versus CellML
models. We also use Turtle rather than XML/RDF syntax in the
document.
Of course, you are always welcome to provide feedback to me or any of the editors!
-John Gennari