Re: Time Shift Patch V1.2 Crack
Leana Eckes
Hi folks, first, i got myself wondering how snapshots work, using timeshift (i dont know other snapshot software, please fell free to recommend them to me). In my distro hopping adventures, its really demanding to install, configure and use all software of my daily routine all again after returning to the main operational system (EndeavourOS in my case). Konsave works wonders when restoring the KDE desktop layout i use, but does not restore my software and some minor tweaks i also use on a daily basis.
The great question of mine is: does snapshots work like this? they function as a restoring point (recreating an exact moment, including software and packages, kinda llike a back-up, of the entire OS) or am I mistaking things?
Just keep in mind you need to be careful about what you include in your snapshot. For example, by default /home is excluded so restoring a snapshot will not restore any of the config in your home directory. On the other hand, if you do include it, it will get restored. But this will also means it will revert all your data to that point in time so any documents/music/pictures/etc that you have created/saved/modified will also be gone.
In the directory /etc/veeam/immureposvc, the immutable service creates a timeLog file when the Hardened Repository starts. In the timeLog file, the system writes every ten minutes the current UTC time and the HW time. When the timeLog file is updated, the system calculates the difference between the old and the updated value adding the result to the moveTime parameter.
If the moveTime value exceeds 24 hours, an immutable retainLock file is created blocking the immutable service from changing the immutability status of backups displaying the warning "repository time shift detected".
yeah, but if you're linked to audio when moving video ( and that audio also wants to move when you tell it to via video track selection ( and that link to audio).. then it gets messed up... you could overwrite the audio at that point or push it ... you're right it's complicated... and I think you can go to the far left and move the tracks ( like move V2 up to V1 ? ) but I don't remember really.... I'll open cs6 and see if I can do that...
a couple of ways to do this. Lock all video tracks except your source and target track (not necessary but an additional layer of safety) . . Make sure your source video track is on in the patch panel of timeline. Put your playhead on the first frame of the source track and select all clips. Hit command-x (cut all) . Then turn off the source video track in the target part of the patch panel of the timeline. Make sure the target track is the only track selected in track target section of the patch panel of the timeline and hit command-v. Pretty simple. Can give you a few other ways, but this seems the simplest to me. If my language is not clear it's probably not my fault. Happy to send a screen grab to make this clearer if you want.
When you have 16 layers of audio or 8 layers of video, with an hour project. It can get very confusion (as you know) when grabing clips and moving them to and from. By grabbing a track and simply moving a track, it eliminates all risk of missing some or writing over some.
The most perfect solution other than to simply allow me to click and drag a track up would be to lock the tracks above, highlight my clips and to nudge them to an empty track above or below, however, if you have a locked tack in between you can't nudge. You have to click and drag and again, run that risk of moving footage.
Final Cut Pro has the feature Todd is describing. Instead of having traditional fixed audio tracks, you assign "Roles" and "Sub-Roles" to different types of audio based on whatever criteria you choose. Those Roles appear below as Audio Lanes which function much like tracks, but without being bound to the stucture of the video layers. With Audio Lanes displayed, you can drag to reorder, collapse, or expand as needed. See example:
When I first got PPro ( CS3 ? ) I didn't have a motion pic camera, so I used an animation to begin to learn the program. Drew stuff in photoshop and imported layers ( with alpha), and put on different video levels ( tracks)... and got the timing down with music ( one audio track) and added soundFX ( more audio tracks, some overlayed ).
However, there are some things like swapping track arrangement or locking selected clips in place on the timeline or locking markers that Vegas had that would make this experience flawless in my eyes.
That's what I'm saying, I want to be able to just click on V1 at the left and highlight the whole V1 track, then click and drag it up or down. It shouldn't even change anything else excet that arrangement. It would be beautiful and quick and eliminate the chances of overwriting clips.
This is exactly what I mean. The current method has a lot of chance for errors if you are not careful in what you are doing. Selecting clips, unlinking audio to video.. shifting up or down. It's archaic.
All I get from these forums is that Premiere users are a different breed, obviously paid by the hour where efficiency isn't a concern. I have been editing since nle was new, starting out on Media 100, then Premiere, Final Cut, then discovered Vegas at version 5, and it has many more user friendly and highly efficient single-click functions than Premiere. I don't need Vegas to "integrate" with anything else as colour correction and basic compositing are all right in the software, accessible from the timeline. This is likely what makes Premiere more solid than Vegas. So our choice is, restarting Vegas a dozen times or clicking a dozen times in Premiere to do a single action
While I see this would be incredibly handy for specific needs, I've never needed this personally. And from talking with others from more than a decade of NAB shows, SMPTE event and several MAX events, along with both this and the BM forums for years ... this isn't something mentioned a lot.
It's like some of the color things I would dearly love changed ... would be awesome for me and a relatively small subset of users. But the vast majority of the user base wouldn't notice, except for the ones angered that the devs had wasted time on some stupid color change.
Edit: And just to be clear, I would welcome the change requested in this thread, and have upvoted this idea every time it's come up. I know it would be so handy for other users, which it always good.
don't detect any snarkiness in your posts... and always a good idea to tell us what your experience level is. I understand what you're saying and can never hurt to post your frustration in case you're missing something. Wondering if there's a way to edit your sequence into a new sequence (not as a nest but actually using the source clips). Think there used to be a way to do that in fcp7. Anyone?
Each of these post-processing apps has bits of the UI that work real well ... and some other part that is done vastly better in a different app. What the ... ? ... is the typical user response there. And you've hit one thing that seems like it should be an obvious thing, but ... obviously ... ain't for someone somewhere in development.
Yea, you can move tracks the way mgrenadier notes, and after doing it a couple times, it's pretty quick ... relatively. So I imagine the engineers may be thinking there's an easy enough method that other things are more seriously in need of engineering time.
Thank you for the link. I agree, it's almost like apple missing obvious everyday interface features that should have been a thing years ago. There are developers who recognize this and create apps to use those features but year after year, apple does not integrate them into the base OS.
I think if we asked the programmers about this, they'd shake their heads and say it's not simple to make this happen (but what do I know). Every time you add a feature, you're creating things that can go wrong and it can be really hard to predict how well it'll function on the variety of OS's and hardware that are out there. That said, the program is so deep, that it's very easy to miss a better way to do things... so let's mark this as a great post...
I think it's pretty obvious that Premiere should have such standard feature to move tracks up/down in order to change their overlay priority. To avoid "linked audio track" issue developers could just make some warning message that "You need to unlink your Video Track's audio if you want to change the Track Order".
The way it functions now is tooo clumsey IMHO. You have e.g. 3 hours project with 10 video tracks, each one consists of thousands sequences, transitions etc... You want to swap V5 and V6 because you need V5 in front of V6 in overlay order. Nowadays (if I'm not mistaken) in 2020 you have to create New empty V11, hunt for red october do a lot of pixel hunting, lock V1-V4, drag all other 3 hrs containments up one track with all those glitches (because it seems to be having to recalculate all previews etc.) Then you've to lock V5, V7-V11 and select and move V7 (that once was your V6) clips down to V5, then to lock it, unlock V8-V11 and all its thousands of trimmed clips, drag'em one track down and then to remove that useless V11.
I want to be able to swap tracks up or down, on top of or below other tracks easily, without having to select all the clips. Currently, if I had tracks V1,2,3,4 and I wanted to move V1 up to where V3 is and move V3 down to V1, I would have to:
Create an empty track between V2 & V3, select all the clips on V1 track, hold SHIFT, drag them up to the empty track. Then highlight the V3 track clips, hold SHIFT, and drag them to V1. If my project is long, I may have to zoom in and out to make sure I have all the clips selected, then zoom in as I shift up or down to make sure they are not shifting on the timeline.
b1e95dc632