On 30 Jun 2022 as I do recall,
Stuart Swales wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 30 June 2022 at 14:48:22 UTC+1 Harriet Bazley wrote:
>
[snip]
> > (What seems to me to be a bug is that both PipeDream and Fireworks will
> > in fact quite happily allow you to attempt to *define* names which clash
> > with existing functions, e.g. 'index', without this throwing up an error
> > of any sort at the point of creation. They even appear in the menu of
> > names which can be inserted into formulae. They just get interpreted as
> > plain text strings instead of as the defined range or value that shows
> > up whenever you inspect or edit them!)
> Looks to me like when it (either PipeDream or Fireworkz) has found a
> function name not followed by an opening parenthesis it needs to have a
> quick look to see if it is a user-defined name.
I'm not sure that user-defined names ought to be allowed to 'overlay'
existing functions, to avoid confusion, but I can see that there is
always going to be a problem with importing sheets from an application
where 'Product' is a perfectly reasonable name for a column containing a
list of products for sale into an otherwise compatible application where
product() has become a functioning keyword in its own right.... :-(
--
Harriet Bazley == Loyaulte me lie ==
But I don't like Spam!!!!