You would need a profile where you had to use check boxes for all of your skills. Then you could use that as a query to find others that had skills you need to finish you project. The only question at that point is, do you use the honor system with skill level?
LinkedIn.com is a great way to reference peoples' skills. If they have
the b**ls to put a skillset on LinkedIn, its probably fro real.
Warren Vail
Vail Systems Technology
war...@vailtech.net
(510) 444-5380
Well close, if you make clear in a Terms of Service Agreement that it is the
members responsibility to verify claims of competence and that The Alley
makes no warentees of accuracy (or some such legal stuff), the The Alley is
off the hook. Need to find ways to reveal deception in claims, if that's
possible. >>
It would be really a wasted effort, if we tried to test people.
I went through something like that on WyzAnt (a tutoring site) and it's a silly idea. The testers themselves sometimes have little idea of what their testing, so the tests are either laughably easy or pathetically unsuited for the requirement.
Credentials are also hard to verify and easy to fake.
I would suggest a point-scoring system, and a feedback system, like Ebay, Amazon, Yelp.
How would you like to mock up the site? Will the Wiki allow us to
create forms, and position elements and such for a visual look and
feel?
I’d suggest something like letting the member rate their own strength in a skill (say Java Script) using a 1 to 5 star system with provision of a text area for the member to describe their most memorable accomplishment with that skill. Kinda hard to fake it all, but those with believable narratives will score higher, and most of those will be reasonably accurate. Those that simply click and provide no description will score less in almost everyones mind.
From: collabora...@googlegroups.com
[mailto:collabora...@googlegroups.com] On
Behalf Of WJho...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011
8:59 AM
To:
collabora...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Business Use Case:
Public Freelancer Trade Show
I would suggest if we allow the posting of user comments, that they be moderated.
Must admit I’m having some difficulty as well keeping the scope under control. What started out as an online collaboration place to meet (which is no minor accomplishment) has morphed into a Public Freelance Trade Show, illustrating that when you think outside the box you sometimes wind up in a different box. Now the discussion about a website is putting it in it’s proper perspective, as a minor part of what has to be accomplished, but a bit out of reach even if that were all we were doing, with the original 5 or so, in this group.
Sorry, but I don’t have the time to go there.
From: collabora...@googlegroups.com [mailto:collabora...@googlegroups.com] On Behalf Of WJho...@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, February 09, 2011
10:20 AM
To: collabora...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: Business Use Case:
Public Freelancer Trade Show
I find it very difficult to maintain the entire conceptual framework in my mind, through email. That's why I suggested we have a site where we can mock-up how we want something to look.