Thanks, Nolan, I appreciate your insights. I'm pretty much on the same page
On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:45 PM Nolan Erck <
nolan...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I like ColdSpring. I like having "XML documentation" for that layer of my
> codebase. As such, I have several sites that I don't plan to migrate to
> DI/1 or WireBox. I also do a lot of Java consulting work, and switching
> from Spring (Java) to ColdSpring (CFML) is less painful for my brain. :)
> That being said, lots of people like DI/1 and Wirebox, but all you'd "gain"
> by moving to them is being able to say "yes we're now using DI/1 instead of
> ColdSpring".
>
> I don't see why ColdSpring would be more likely to break from a future CF
> update than any other library. One should always test code when changing
> flavors of CF, that's not specific to ColdSpring.
>
> Personally, I'd leave the site alone at least for now. Future projects, I
> consider DI/1 or Wirebox, depending on the stack and requirements. I'm
> also semi-secretly hoping someone maintains ColdSpring moving forward, but
> I'm probably in the minority on that.
>
> 2 cents. Hope that helped.
>
> -Nolan
>
> PS. Shameless plug! I'm giving a talk at dev.Objective() titled "Dependency
> Injection: Why Is It Awesome and Why Should I Care?" Ya'll should come
> watch! :)
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 8:31 AM, Dean Lawrence <
dea...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >