> Please don't do it off-list, several of us could be interested.
In case anyone is interested, as Claude recommended, It was relatively easy
to check for the foreign script injection by
myturfads.com. There is a
test page with the code located at
http://www.uxb.net/adtest/ that will look
to see if your client is seeing the Google ad being replaced by the
myturfads.com
In case you are wondering what I am talking about. Some ISP's are using a
proxy technology that in real time intercepts the Google Ad JavaScript code
and replaces it with their own advertising from a company (MyTurf -
www.myturfads.com) that specializes in injecting local advertising into
existing ad spaces for Local ISP's. They replace the google or double
click JS code with their own and can add/inject pop-up and video ads into
sites that only use text or image advertising from Google. Very Annoying!
Based on the testing I have done with one of my more trafficked sites that
have ads on them (
hce.halomaps.org) there are at least two ISP's that are
using the ad-replacement proxy technology in three different regions:
Brewster NY, Denver CO. and Boise ID. NY and CO were Comcast and ID was
CenturyLink. I am seeing multiple IPS from each area, mostly in the same B
and C blocks.
The way the test page works is that after loading it looks for any script
called from "
myturfads.com" on the page and then lists the scripts and warns
if one was found. If one was found it performs an AJAX call and sends me an
email with the client IP.
I have contacted and opened a case with Google about this and they were very
interested, but of course I only get to deal with the front line support
person so I have no idea what they intend. I also contacted a copyright law
firm and they were interested but because it is Google's Code and not mine
that is being replaced an infringement case would be tough. Not only that
but apparently there is no case law that says the ISP cannot replace or
inject scripts. To proceed further it would require I cover legal research
costs to see if there was a case to be had. It gets all muddy,
especially now with the FCC's new Net Neutrality regulations still not fully
defined and already under legal attack.
I find this behavior on the part of the ISP's abhorrent and dangerous.
Right now they are replacing advertising and stealing revenue from the
advertiser and Web Publisher. But they could just as easily replace articles
or any real content on the fly as well. And the worst of it is that there
is apparently no legal precedent to the contrary.
Thanks for listening.
Archive:
http://www.houseoffusion.com/groups/cf-talk/message.cfm/messageid:360348