On Jul 8, 2020, at 4:27 AM, thomasjones1505 via CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection <cod...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Hi Yuchao,Apologies, I accidentally deleted the previous thread.--The coverage/associated stats appear to fine for the majority, below is an example of the results, all from different samples. I have several similar outcomes. Could it be that somewhere upstream of this positions are being matched by position only instead of chr+position?<Auto Generated Inline Image 1>Many thanks,Tom Jones
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codex2+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codex2/11e83e36-3fcf-47f7-94e3-9f8e9701f1ebo%40googlegroups.com.
<Auto Generated Inline Image 1>
Yes this is indeed a bit bizarre. Have you checked in your input bed file whether these correspond to the actual exons/targets?
Yuchao
Sent from my iPhoneOn Jul 8, 2020, at 4:27 AM, thomasjones1505 via CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection <cod...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Hi Yuchao,Apologies, I accidentally deleted the previous thread.--The coverage/associated stats appear to fine for the majority, below is an example of the results, all from different samples. I have several similar outcomes. Could it be that somewhere upstream of this positions are being matched by position only instead of chr+position?<Auto Generated Inline Image 1>Many thanks,Tom Jones
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cod...@googlegroups.com.
On Jul 10, 2020, at 12:37 PM, thomasjones1505 via CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection <cod...@googlegroups.com> wrote:
Hi Yuchao,Apologies but I'm not sure I fully understand.I think I may have resolved the issue by running CODEX separately on individual chromosomes instead of all together. But that's more of a work around rather than a real fix!Tom
On Wednesday, 8 July 2020 11:45:23 UTC+1, Yuchao Jiang wrote:Yes this is indeed a bit bizarre. Have you checked in your input bed file whether these correspond to the actual exons/targets?
YuchaoSent from my iPhoneOn Jul 8, 2020, at 4:27 AM, thomasjones1505 via CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection <cod...@googlegroups.com> wrote:Hi Yuchao,Apologies, I accidentally deleted the previous thread.The coverage/associated stats appear to fine for the majority, below is an example of the results, all from different samples. I have several similar outcomes. Could it be that somewhere upstream of this positions are being matched by position only instead of chr+position?<Auto Generated Inline Image 1>Many thanks,Tom Jones--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cod...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codex2/11e83e36-3fcf-47f7-94e3-9f8e9701f1ebo%40googlegroups.com.
<Auto Generated Inline Image 1>--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "CODEX/CODEX2 for CNV detection" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to codex2+un...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codex2/e5042e20-7000-4851-a6d3-44750589b81fo%40googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/codex2/e5042e20-7000-4851-a6d3-44750589b81fo%40googlegroups.com.