map fields directly

[schlachtzeuger]

Hi,

i'd like to map fields directly with conform. eg

public class MyClass
{
private string _field0ToMap;
private string _field1ToMap;
.
.
.
}

Is this possible? How?

Regards
Andy

[Fabio Maulo]

what you mean?

With those "...." my answer could be:

Yes, for sure, if you do ... and then ... you have the result you are looking for.

--
Fabio Maulo

[schlachtzeuger]

you're right, i'll have to explain better:

given this class:

public class Entity
{
private Guid _id;
private string _name;

/*nh ctor*/ protected Entity() {}

public Entity(Guid id, string name)
{
_id = id;
_name = name;
}
}

i'd like to use conform to get this mapping:

<?xml version="1.0"?>
<hibernate-mapping
xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema"
xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
xmlns="urn:nhibernate-mapping-2.2"
namespace="Ebe.Tests"
assembly="Ebe.Tests">

<class name="Entity">
<id name="_id"
unsaved-value="00000000-0000-0000-0000-000000000000"
access="field">
<generator class="assigned" />
</id>
<property name="_name" access="field" />
</class>

</hibernate-mapping>


thx

On 24 Feb., 16:35, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> what you mean?
> With those "...." my answer could be:
> Yes, for sure, if you do ... and then ... you have the result you are
> looking for.
>
> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:24 PM, schlachtzeuger

> <schlachtzeu...@gmail.com>wrote:

>
>
>
>
>
> > Hi,
>
> > i'd like to map fields directly with conform. eg
>
> > public class MyClass
> > {
> > private string _field0ToMap;
> > private string _field1ToMap;
> > .
> > .
> > .
> > }
>
> > Is this possible? How?
>
> > Regards
> > Andy
>
> --

> Fabio Maulo- Zitierten Text ausblenden -
>
> - Zitierten Text anzeigen -

[Diego Mijelshon]

For the Id:

    orm.Patterns.Poids.Add(mi => mi.Name == "_id");

Not sure about the field.

In any case: that's a terrible domain design. Why do you have persistent fields that aren't exposed in any way (except in the constructor!)? Why do you have a field for the Id if you're not exposing it?

 
    Diego

[schlachtzeuger]

Hi

so is it possible to do the mapping explained in the post (on 26. Feb
13:46) ?

... i didn't ask how to do good domain design, i'm just evaluating
conform on a technical level ...

regards

On 26 Feb., 16:51, Diego Mijelshon <di...@mijelshon.com.ar> wrote:
> For the Id:
>
>     orm.Patterns.Poids.Add(mi => mi.Name == "_id");
>
> Not sure about the field.
>
> In any case: that's a terrible domain design. Why do you have persistent
> fields that aren't exposed in any way (except in the constructor!)? Why do
> you have a field for the Id if you're not exposing it?
>
>     Diego
>

> > > - Zitierten Text anzeigen -- Zitierten Text ausblenden -

[Fabio Maulo]

well... 

what exactly mean for you "field access" ?

have you only field without properties ?

do you need the field only for the POID ?

"Good design" is not a minor matter here... ConfORM does not give support to composite-id for some reason ;)

Please send a couple of classes mimic your domain and I will implements the UsageExample (I would spend time solving a well known problem and not inventing a problem).

Thanks.

--
Fabio Maulo

[Diego Mijelshon]

OK, on a technical level, ConfORM works really well with most _sane_ designs.

If you want to hack a mapping around an arbitrarily weird domain, use XML mappings instead.
 
    Diego

[Fabio Maulo]

please send the domain to use as example.
Thanks.

--
Fabio Maulo

[schlachtzeuger]

by now i have no domain in c#, i'll send it, if i have something, but
this will take some time, i think until sunday or so

thx

On 1 Mrz., 04:37, Fabio Maulo <fabioma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> please send the domain to use as example.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Fabio Maulo
>

[Fabio Maulo]

It is clear to me that the case is: "or so"

--
Fabio Maulo