Like palm weevil grubs, rhino beetle grubs are edible and, as an alternative to destroying the LY palm trunks these might be used as CONTROLLED breeding sites where the grubs are "harvested" and processed on-farm for chicken or cattle food. The coconut farmers would even recoup some of their losses by selling dry RGM (rhino grub meal) to produce pet food (or freshly killed grubs to restaurants catering for tourists and connoisseurs).
Has anyone considered to look at the BRIX ( Sugar levels ) levels in the actual stem or leave of the palm tree. I am not very familiar CLYD, but from our experience with any vegetative food crops, trees or shrubs, the opinion has been established, that, - If the plant is lacking basic mineralization then the plant becomes infested by pest. Pests or vermin’s, sucker insects, grubs or fungus etc.etc. – Mineralization is responsible for the Glycol levels in plants. In simple terms Glycol = Sugar = Alcohol. Alcohol is a very effective pest control mechanism build in to the plants (trees) defense system, against pest. Through high Brix levels, sugar and mineralization levels a pro-plant environment will be established while with lack of mineralization infestation of any possible pest according to local climate, soil, and other specific prevalence will occur.
Regards,
Ben K Hugi
Reference : http://blog.sperdirect.com/Blog/?Tag=brix
Brix Resources for the Consumer and Farmer
(Note this is not an exhaustive list, but merely several possibilities)
ONLINE Articles and books
Where to buy refractometers
Email List
Agricultural Laboratories and Consultants
Books
(Many of these books are available from Pike Agrilab or Acres USA)
No virus found
in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.392 / Virus Database: 270.13.49/2295 - Release Date: 08/10/09
18:19:00
Hello All,
It is not only sugar or Glycol! It is primarily mineralization which determine the Glycol levels, which makes the plant resistant.
( Ratio of Sugar to mineralization+ Protective Factor and not how much sugar!!!)
For instance : Sugar /Mineralization ratio issues are common with older plantations. Some of the plantations have been planted back in colonial times. If the tree planting is not fallen far back as the twenties and thirties, or at least before second world war. Eventually, it is still the same plot or plantation grounds which have been used over decades without any soil restoration other than foliage composting. Composting foliage, which was equally deficient in mineralization as the soil which produced the leafy foliage in the first place. Over decades of soil exploitation and no regeneration of the soil condition, the mineral exhaustion of the plantation as causal issue, becomes apparent.!
As we know that coconut palm-tree-sap from younger palms produces a much more vigorous fermentation in the processing of traditional “Toddy”, “Kallu” “Jaggery” than the sap of older or perhaps exhausted palm trees, which have reached 35- 40 + years of age. More vigorous fermentation because of higher Glycol content?? If the plantation is over 40 years, or even older, considering the collapse of the coconut industry dates back to the mid- fifties, and no more funding was entering the coconut-industry, Since then. not many coconut plantations throughout the coconut belt from east to west have been properly managed (Except the Philippines and some small areas in Thailand)
Should we then, not consider the CLYD as an expression of a fertilizer problem and a precursor to render the coconut palm vulnerable to Weevil and Rhino beetle infestation.
Is THIS possibly one of the reasons that the plantations in the Philippines are not affected. As those plantation are younger on build on unspoiled soils with a good fertilizer profiles.
Traditional palm sugar production from coconut palm in Thailand, Malaysia and Indonesia have stepped virtually into non existence, because their old coconut palms (Some are 45 years and older) are not able to deliver sufficient saturated sap and the sapping is punishing the old palm stock too much rendering the trees unable to sustain and maintain good health.
Following, I have added a text extract about “Brixing” for people to look at the possibility and not at the impossibility of the Brix concept as a modality of exploration and application in the field particularly with younger high yield plantations. Preventing possible plant exhaustion with simple inexpensive measures.
I also would like to refer to the book written by MIKE FOALE : The Coconut Odyssey: The bounteous possibilities of the tree of life.
ISBN : 1 86320 369 9 (printed)
ISBN : 1 86320 370 2 (online)
Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, GPO Box 1571, Canberra ACT 2601
http:// aciar.gov.au – e-mail: ac...@aciar.gov.au
In this particular publication Mike Foale is showing on Table 5.1: Variations of common nutrient deficiencies.
Visual symptoms: leaflet colour variation or abnormal shape of frond/leaflet.
--------------------------
What is Brix?
Plant sap contains nutrients which feed it, and determine its health and resistance to disease and stress. The Brix is the % of dissolved Solids in the Sap.
How is Brix measured?
The solids in plant sap are measured as Brix using a Refractometer. The Brix measurement is read as the % of dissolved solids in the sap. For example a low quality apple would show a Brix reading of 7.4 or below, this indicates there is 7.4% or less solids in the sap of the apple.
Why is it important to a plant?
A high Brix sap has a reduced water activity which is the ratio of sap to pure water vapour pressure. With this low water activity a High Brix sap has a reduced freezing point and subsequently a greater frost resistance. Each additional Brix unit protects a plant by a further 0.5C. In the other extreme, this reduced water activity produces a proportionally greater tendency to retain moisture, and increase heat wilt resistance.
While the temperature or pH can influence if and how fast a organism will grow, the level of water activity may be the most important factor.
Higher Brix levels prevent bacterial and fungal infestations and thus increase storage life. Most bacteria for example, do not grow at water activities below 0.91 (around 9 mole % dissolved solids, corrected for molecular weights) and most moulds cease to grow at Water Activities below 0.80 (over 20 mole % dissolved solids). Water Activity is thus a critical factor in determining shelf life as well as field success.
Brix sap levels in excess of 12% also generally ensure against sap-sucking insect infestations.
In addition,a high Brix level provides proportionally greater nutritional content of the food; and ensures good old-fashioned, true nature-ripened flavour. This is especially evident where the refractometer shows a diffuse or spread reading, indicating a variety of complex dissolved plant proteins and flavour components in good proportions, indicating high food value for the consumer
According to Bruce Tainio:
o The desired sap pH-level for optimal plant growth and production is pH 6.4.
o If sap pH exceeds 6.4, then the most likely cause will be a shortage of the anions of nitrogen, phosphate or sulphur.
o At pH 8 the likelihood of insect trouble is 100%.
o Conversely, if sap pH is lower than 6.4, then there is a cation problem, with possible deficiencies of calcium, magnesium, potassium and/or sodium.
Low sap pH suggests a far greater potential for foliar disease. For example, at pH 4.5 the probability for fungal appearance is 100%.
Regards,
Ben K Hugi
-- Michel DOLLET Head Research Unit 29 : Etiology Wilts CIRAD-BIOS TA A 29/F Campus International de Baillarguet 34398 Montpellier cedex 5 France michel...@cirad.fr Tél : 33 (0) 4 67 59 39 22 Fax : 33 (0) 4 67 59 38 19 http://www.cirad.fr/ur/etiologie_deperissements
<IMG_0971_Cabo de Ulu.JPG><IMG_0772.jpg><b 61 IMG_2514 Inhassunge.jpg>
<August 2009 699.jpg><August 2009 120.jpg><August 2009 125.jpg><August 2009 662.jpg><August 2009 695.jpg>
Dear HughI seem to have touched a raw nerve here somewhere. Sorry.
The chemical we used 20 years ago in such situations was a granular formulation of BHC but I do not believe it is available today (it was not highly toxic but it is persistent).
Dear friends,
We in Indonesia, control the Rhinoceros beetle by using Baculovirus and Metharizium anisopliae.
Control by using Metharizium anisopliae giving better result compared by Baculovirus.
The methode was very easy, only by spreading Metharizium colonies to the beetle nests
area
Thanks,and hopethis information willbeusefulto you all
Riyaldi
|
Dear Mr.Lobo,
Given below is the management practice being followed by us and used to educate our farmers regarding controlling of Rhinoceros Beetle.
Control measures
Hook out the beetle from the attacked palms using a beetle hook. As a prophylactic measure, fill up the top most three leaf axils in grown up trees or in between the leaf axils of 2 to 3 bottom leaves in young plants with Sevidol 8G(25g) + fine sand (200g) or Phorate (Thimet 10G) + Neem cake + river sand thrice in April, September and December.
Alternately, Place 10.5g naphthalene balls in the leaf axils and cover it with fine sand. To be practiced once in 45 days.
Use pheromone trap for attracting beetles and kill the trapped beetles. Care should be taken to ensure that these traps are placed on the boundaries of the land to avoid beetles entering the middle of the land.
Spraying 0.01% Carbaryl (50WP) in the breeding sites of the beetle helps destroy the larva. Biological control also is possible through virus Baculovirus oryctus by releasing 10 - 15 virus infected beetles in 1 ha, or mix metarihzam bio bacteria in the ratio of 5gms in one ltr of water and spray to control the grubs of the beetle.
We have also used a virus called Metarahsium, which was supposed to enter the beetle body and start incapacitating the beetle and not allowing it to eat food so that the beetle will die eventually. But this was not very effective as the beetle has to attack the seedling to get the virus attack. We stopped using this.
We have also tried fishnet method as well as placing human hair strands around the young plants in the basin area in Honnavar but the beetle started finding its way to reach the stem area by going underneath.
Thanks
M.MURALI
Dear friends. As long as I know, the Metarhizium is not a virus, it is belong to the fungi group. The virus is Baculovirus.
I allready used both of those control agent, and the fungi was more effective than the virus. The fungi also easier to handle
Regards.
Riyaldi
|