finding blocked pathways

39 views
Skip to first unread message

Uri David Akavia

unread,
Mar 22, 2019, 10:53:46 AM3/22/19
to COBRA Toolbox
Hi.

I'm reviewing a modification I made of RECON 2.2, and I'm wondering about blocked reactions.
Some reactions stand alone, and unblocking them will only unblock one reaction. Some reactions are pathways - for example, the modified model couldn't produce HMG-CoA, which meant that the entire cholesterol synthesis pathway was blocked. I figured this out by looking at the reactions and reviewing biology, but I'm wondering if there is a computational way to prioritize pathways.

I'll give two toy examples of a series of blocked reactions
A ---> B
C ---> D ---> E ----> F ----> G

In the first case, fixing this reaction will only solve one.
In the second case, if C is not produced, then at least 4 reactions are blocked. It also means that looking at D, E, F is potentially a waste of time, because even if those reaction is perfect, they will still be blocked.

I'd like to prioritize chains of multiple blocked reactions and focus on them, because the biological review can take a long time.
I've tried using findBlockedReactions, findNeighborReactions and finding gaps or dead ends, but I can't seem to combine them in the way I want. Can I use graph connectivity properties for this?

I feel like someone has published an algorithm about that, but I'm not sure. Any suggestions?

Thanks,

Uri David

Ines Thiele

unread,
Mar 22, 2019, 11:01:20 AM3/22/19
to cobra-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Uri

Is there a particular reason why you use Recon2.2 instead of Recon 3?
Ines

Sent from my iPhone
--

---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "COBRA Toolbox" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to cobra-toolbo...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Uri David Akavia

unread,
Mar 22, 2019, 2:02:16 PM3/22/19
to cobra-...@googlegroups.com
Hi Ines,

I started working on RECON 2.2 before RECON3 was published, and I'm wrapping it up now. I don't want to redo my work on RECON 3D.
Any suggestions on prioritizing blocked reactions?

Uri David

You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the Google Groups "COBRA Toolbox" group.
To unsubscribe from this topic, visit https://groups.google.com/d/topic/cobra-toolbox/_WFODy_jsX0/unsubscribe.
To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to cobra-toolbo...@googlegroups.com.

Ronan M.T. Fleming

unread,
Mar 22, 2019, 2:34:41 PM3/22/19
to COBRA Toolbox
Hi Uri,
you could try forcing a reaction to be active that is blocked, then try to find if relaxing a minimal number of bounds can unblock it. 
Regards,
Ronan
--
Mr. Ronan MT Fleming B.V.M.S. Dip. Math. Ph.D.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assistant Professor,
Division of Systems Biomedicine and Pharmacology,
Leiden Academic Centre for Drug Research,
Faculty of Science,
Leiden University.
&
H2020 Project Coordinator
Systems Medicine of Mitochondrial Parkinson’s Disease
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peer-reviewed publications: https://goo.gl/FZPG23
Mobile:  +353 873 413 072
Skype: ronan.fleming
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
(This message is confidential and may contain privileged information. It is intended for the named recipient only. If you receive it in error please notify me and permanently delete the original message and any copies.)

Andres Mauricio Pinzon Velasco

unread,
Mar 22, 2019, 4:36:33 PM3/22/19
to cobra-toolbox
Dear Dr. Fleming,
In the tutorial you just cited there is a citation to a work entitled: "Cardinality optimisation in constraint-based modelling: Application to Recon 3D ", but I have not been able to find it, is this still under revision or can I find it in a specific place?
Regards,



Andrés M. Pinzón Ph.D.
AssociateProfessor
Instituto de Genética - Universidad Nacional de Colombia
+57 (1) 3165000 Ext. 11618 Office: 218




Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages