Although I started birding as a kid, earlyish in the last century, and was a busy birder
in the 60's and 70's, I was out in the field much less during the 80's, when nesting overwhelmed me, soon
followed by first and second cycle year off-spring, etc. So when I found time for birding again, in the 1990's,
I realized that I needed to educate myself about the dreaded "T" word--Taxonomy!
"Do Woodpeckers come before or after Flycatchers?" I'd ask myself.
If your own answer is "Who cares?" it's OK to stop reading now.
I started hopped on the early part of the learning curve by studying "Non-passerines" vs "Passerines."
What a "false dichotomy!" After all, why is not the taxonomy of sporting equipment divided into "baseball bats" and "everything that is not a baseball bat?"
But, I digress.
As a memory crutch, I devised an alphabet of Colorado's bird families, from loons through finches, reflecting the now out-moded taxonomy of that era:
A was for loons, cormorants, and pelicans
B was for herons and egrets
C was for Ducks and Geese,
D was for Hawks
and so on, in taxonomic order, one letter for each group.
In my own alphabetic system, I "lumped" swifts and hummers, so I would not run out of letters of the alphabet.
Fortuitously,
G was for Gulls
P was for pipits and Phainopepla-- how nice!
Q was for vireos and warblers
S was conveniently for Sparrows,
and this alphabet ended with
U for icterids, then
V for finches. (For a while I had X for House Sparrows, but gave that up, trying to keep it simple).
I coped with some minor family rearrangements, as the vireos moved away from warblers
and herons and falcons were bumped around.
As an exercise, I looked at the latest (but surely not final) taxonomic arrangement of birds, and here is how my old alphabet
went bezonkers:
C now comes first, for Ducks and Geese, followed by
E for gallinaceous birds, etc, etc.
The newest taxonomy, using my old alphabet is now:
C
E
A
H
I
E
F
G
A
B
D
H
I
J
D (again)
K
G
M
L
N
O
P
X
P (take a breath)
V
S
R
Q
S
T
R
U!
So there you have it, what I now call the "A C B's" of modern avian taxonomy.
Finally, so I won't be misunderstood as a taxonomic Luddite, I admire progress in avian taxonomy, feeling that advances like DNA analysis, sound recordings, etc, etc are bringing us closer and closer to "reality,"
with a better understanding of what the birds have known all along.
Joe Roller, Denver
Find me in the phone book under the "R's".
OOPS! Are there phone books anymore?