Hello Mini-Grants Committee,
Peter, thank you very much for asking for clarification. Historically each CAS center has been treated as an independent applicant (note the awards for 2020 listed on their respective rows), so we'll do the same for this year. I think I accidentally split those last funds evenly instead of designating them appropriately to the higher-ranked CAS recipient, so thank you for pointing that out. It has been amended in the spreadsheet. CAS (Milford) now receives $950, as that is the remaining funds in our budget, so the Meriden Conservation Committee grant request is not funded.
**My two biggest concerns as the chair of the Mini-Grants Committee are the following**:
1. Our guidelines state that preference is given to new applicants, however half of this year's new applicants (2 out of 4) did not receive funding due to their rankings. I understand that project proposals may not be appropriate for COA Mini-Grants, or that applicants just may not have a strong application in general, but it's worth noting, and as a committee we should remember this moving forward.
2. Secondly, our guidelines also state that grant awards may be limited to two consecutive years per applicant. With our current rankings, Roaring Brook Nature Center will receive another grant this year, after receiving $500 in 2024, $1000 in 2023, and $500 in 2019.
Just some food for thought! Please take a second look at the sheet to see if there's anything else that I missed. I appreciate your efforts on this. We'll need to finalize it all by the board meeting on Monday evening.
Thank you,
Allison