Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
No Way CNN Tried to Sell This a Legitimate Defense of Claudine Gay's Plagiarism
0 views
Skip to first unread message
useapen
Jan 3, 2024, 3:29:10 AM1/3/24
to
There is no way this is an accurate statement from a reporter. Has the
liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one’s termination
are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
abysmal. There’s no need to split hairs here—and doing so makes you look
like an idiot.
CNN’s Matt Egan attempted to explain how now-former Harvard President
Claudine Gay wasn’t accused of stealing anyone’s ideas. She just copied
other people’s work and passed them off as her own without attribution.
Egan, that’s plagiarism.
Steve Guest
@SteveGuest
·
Follow
Bonkers explanation from CNN reporter Matt Egan on the Harvard plagiarism
scandal:
"We should note that Claudine Gay has not been accused of stealing
anyone's ideas in any of her writings. She has been accused of sort of
more like copying other peoples writings without… Show more
Is this how the media is going to explain homicides now: ‘The man wasn’t
accused of murder, just shooting someone so many times that the victim
died as a result.’
What a clown show.
Spencer wrote that Gay’s time at Harvard is over after multiple
accusations of plagiarism were lobbed against the beleaguered college
president, who should have resigned after her atrocious remarks about
antisemitism last December. Gay refused to condemn calls for genocide
against Jews, saying such actions were judged on a case-by-case basis.
While Gay isn’t resigning over that, her being exposed as an academic
fraud is certainly more damning.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/02/no-way-cnn-tried-to-
make-this-a-legitimate-defense-for-claudine-gays-plagiarism-
n2633096?utm_medium=widget&utm_source=slider
liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one’s termination
are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
abysmal. There’s no need to split hairs here—and doing so makes you look
like an idiot.
CNN’s Matt Egan attempted to explain how now-former Harvard President
Claudine Gay wasn’t accused of stealing anyone’s ideas. She just copied
other people’s work and passed them off as her own without attribution.
Egan, that’s plagiarism.
Steve Guest
@SteveGuest
·
Follow
Bonkers explanation from CNN reporter Matt Egan on the Harvard plagiarism
scandal:
"We should note that Claudine Gay has not been accused of stealing
anyone's ideas in any of her writings. She has been accused of sort of
more like copying other peoples writings without… Show more
Is this how the media is going to explain homicides now: ‘The man wasn’t
accused of murder, just shooting someone so many times that the victim
died as a result.’
What a clown show.
Spencer wrote that Gay’s time at Harvard is over after multiple
accusations of plagiarism were lobbed against the beleaguered college
president, who should have resigned after her atrocious remarks about
antisemitism last December. Gay refused to condemn calls for genocide
against Jews, saying such actions were judged on a case-by-case basis.
While Gay isn’t resigning over that, her being exposed as an academic
fraud is certainly more damning.
https://townhall.com/tipsheet/mattvespa/2024/01/02/no-way-cnn-tried-to-
make-this-a-legitimate-defense-for-claudine-gays-plagiarism-
n2633096?utm_medium=widget&utm_source=slider
Marvin White
Jan 3, 2024, 11:20:18 AM1/3/24
to
>There is no way this is an accurate statement from a reporter. Has the
>liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
>will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one's termination
>are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
>abysmal. There's no need to split hairs here-and doing so makes you look
>liberal media become so desperate to protect their bad actors that they
>will try to explain how serious infractions that lead to one's termination
>are trivial matters? If this was an attempt at gaslighting, it was
>like an idiot.
Fox News just hired her to replace Hannity.
0 new messages